Azamina Deck #773192 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 32/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox, Tempo
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 60 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 2 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Large Level 8 Fire King / Snake-Eye / Diabellstar boss monsters (Lava Golem, Snake-Eyes Flamberge Dragon, Garunix, Diabellstar) and Azamina Fusion/Xyz/Link extra-deck threats, if the opening hand converts; Extra-deck pressure from Saint Azamina, Galaxy-Eyes Photon Lord, Number 38 and The Zombie Vampire once the board is cleared
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a Fire King or Snake-Eye starter (or Mulcharmy draw engine), bring a 3-card-level-8 boss through Fire King High Avatar/Garunix searches; Diabellstar and Snake-Eye lines are text-only inference because no boards were recorded
• Turn 2 (going second): Use the 14 hand traps (Ash Blossom, Ghost Ogre, Ghost Belle, Infinite Impermanence, D.D. Crow) to answer the opponent's first starter, then rebuild with Fire King/Snake-Eye followers
• Recovery: Recursion through Fire King Sanctuary/Island, Snake-Eye Oak/Poplar GY effects, Mulcharmy draw effects when the hand empties (conditional on having no cards on field)
• After siding: No side deck is run (side count 0), so there is no post-side plan; the deck has no sideboarding route for best-of-3 play

Why it scores here

The deck is scored as a system: the Fire King, Snake-Eye and Mulcharmy engines share a Level 1 and Level 8 FIRE body but not a clean synergy line, so starter access is only about 0.61 for the archetype-core group in a 5-card hand (hypergeometric, Inferred). Interaction is the strongest part: 14 hand traps, several negation and removal spells, and Infinite Impermanence and Skill Drain give it a real answer density, and its going-second hand-trap hit rate is about 0.81 (Inferred). Closing power comes from several 3000-ATK boss monsters, but the ceiling and median are not measured because no combos were supplied, so combo output is text-only and Inferred. The list is illegal (Ash Blossom at 3 copies against a 2 limit, WANTED at 2 against a 1 limit) and runs no side deck, so it is capped low. Popularity and archetype usage did not earn points, and card scores were not averaged.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange primary; no meta weight (Meta provisional). Structural ≈ 47, Going First ≈ 45, Going Second ≈ 55, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 40. Modifiers: illegal copy-limit cap (-12); no side deck (-2). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers (Meta provisional); 45.6 before modifiers, then illegal-deck cap applied to 32

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.61 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.39 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense hand-trap and negation package (14 hand traps, 13 negation-text cards)
• Multiple 2700-3000 ATK boss monsters with varied extra-deck access
• Searcher density (13 cards) for consistent access to the main engine

Weaknesses

• Illegal copy counts: Ash Blossom x3 (limit 2) and WANTED x2 (limit 1)
• Very low exact-archetype purity (4%); engines from Fire King, Snake-Eye, Mulcharmy and Azamina do not reinforce each other
• No side deck for best-of-3 games
• Only 6 of 10 usage-core cards present; Azamina Mu Rcielago and Ilia Silvia missing

Critical choke points

• Ash Blossom and Ghost Belle/Ogre triple-copy reliance: one copy-limit fix removes a hand-trap copy
• Azamina core cards missing, so Azamina extra-deck access depends on a few Sinful Spoils cards
• Fire King Island/Sanctuary chain depends on a single Field-zone card

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Illegal status: Ash Blossom 3 copies vs 2 legal; WANTED 2 vs 1 legal; 60 main / 15 extra / 0 side and banlist fields from the export; Archetype purity 4% and 6 of 10 usage-core cards present
• Inferred: Archetype-core hand access about 0.61 (hypergeometric); Hand-trap going-second hit rate about 0.81; Interaction density from card text (14 hand traps, removal text)
• Provisional: Meta Power null; matchup fit D13 unknown without a dated meta sample
• Data gaps: no combos supplied — combo floor/median/ceiling is text-only inference no tournament link — archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent no win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN — brick/starter/OTK rates are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied deck title is null and no guides exist for the archetype