Predaplant Deck #769782 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±10 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox, Control
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 58 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 1 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Fusion Summon DARK boss monsters (Starving Venom Predapower Fusion Dragon 3600 ATK, Predaplant Triphyoverutum 3000 ATK, Predaplant Dragostapelia 2700 ATK) off Predaplant/Predap starters and Polymerization-type spells; Predaplant Daredevil and Predaplant Ambulomelides via Predap/Predaplant recursion and Predaplant Chimerafflesia banish-based pressure
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a Predap/Predaplant starter (Ophrys Scorpio, Longinephila, Predaprimitive, Predapractice) that searches a Polymerization or Fusion Spell, then Fusion Summon a DARK boss; hand traps held for the opponent's first interruption
• Turn 2 (going second): Use the hand traps (Ash Blossom, Infinite Impermanence, Dominus Impulse, Maxx C, Droll & Lock Bird) to stop the opponent's first board, then Fusion Summon through the disrupted turn
• Recovery: Predaplant recursion from the GY (Byblisp, Darlingtonia Cobra, Predaplanet, Predaplanning) and Polymerization search to rebuild a Fusion line after a one-card disruption
• After siding: Not evaluable: the deck has no Side Deck (side_count 0), so there is no post-side plan

Why it scores here

The deck's consistency rests on the Predaplant/Predap core: 21 core-group copies give about a 0.90 chance of at least one in a 5-card opening hand, and 15 searcher-text cards add redundancy (Inferred from hypergeometric estimates). Conversion is real but untested, since no recorded boards exist, so the ceiling (Dragostapelia, Triphyoverutum, Starving Venom Predapower) is scored from card text only. Interaction is dense for a deck of this size (7 hand traps plus several negation and removal spells), which lifts the end-board and going-second dimensions. Score was not earned from archetype popularity or usage statistics, and card scores were not averaged; the structural read (about 61) is the system read. The deck is Illegal because Albion the Branded Dragon is Forbidden and runs one copy, so the Final score is capped at 30 and the evaluation is structural-only.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 61, Going First ≈ 60, Going Second ≈ 64, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 45. Modifiers: banlist exposure (-4). Final formula: Structural 61 (Combo profile). Final would be 0.80*61 + 0.20*45 - 4 ≈ 54, but the deck is Illegal (Forbidden Albion over limit), so Final is capped at 30 and the result is structural-only.

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.91 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.1 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Core group of 21 copies gives about a 0.90 chance of at least one starter in hand of 5
• Layered interaction: 7 hand traps and 13 negation-text cards
• Fusion closers with high ATK (3600, 3000, 2700) and recursion routes through the GY

Weaknesses

• Illegal: Albion the Branded Dragon is Forbidden and runs one copy
• No Side Deck, so no post-side plan
• Low archetype purity (21.9% exact name) with many off-archetype and generic utility cards
• No recorded combos, so median and ceiling are unverified

Critical choke points

• Predaplant starters and the Polymerization/Fusion Spell that enables the Fusion line; a single disruption to the starter route stalls the turn
• Forbidden Albion makes the list illegal until removed

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Illegal: Albion the Branded Dragon is Forbidden, 1 copy run, 0 legal copies; Main 58 (40-60), Extra 15 (0-15), Side 0 (0-15 allowed); Copy limits otherwise satisfied (Ash Blossom 2/2, Dominus Impulse 2/2, Super Polymerization 2/2, The Fallen & The Virtuous 1/2); Fusion composition: 14 Fusion, 1 Synchro in Extra; exact archetype purity 21.9%
• Observed: Core-group presence: 9 of 16 usage-stat core cards in this list (56.2%)
• Inferred: Starter access ≈ 0.90 with the 21-copy core group (hypergeometric); Interaction density high from hand-trap and negation card text; Going-first and going-second scores from the dimension mix; Structural 61 from the Combo weight profile
• Provisional: Meta Power (null) and matchup fit: no dated meta sample and no tournament link
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are from card text only No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent No win-rate telemetry for going-first/second, matchup, or brick/starter/OTK rates Meta Power is provisional without a dated metagame sample No Side Deck, so the post-side score is not measured Deck title is null