T.G. Deck #756066 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 35/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox, Tempo
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 4 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Synchro pressure from T.G. Glaive Blaster / T.G. Over Dragonar / T.G. Hyper Librarian boards, with draw from Synchro triggers; Snake-Eye and Horus recursion-based boards (Imsety, Hapi) when legal pieces allow
• Turn 1 (going first): Opening T.G. searchers and Snake-Eye/Horus starters, then Synchro into the T.G. Extra Deck monsters
• Turn 2 (going second): Hand traps (Ash Blossom, Infinite Impermanence, Maxx C, Droll & Lock Bird) to break the opponent's starter, then a Synchro follow-up
• Recovery: T.G. Striker and T.G. Tank Grub recursion plus T.G. Monster searches from the Deck and GY
• After siding: No Side Deck is registered in the export (side_count 0), so no post-side plan can be assessed

Why it scores here

The score comes from the system as a whole, not from averaging its cards. The T.G. core (14 exact-name copies, roughly 78 percent chance of at least one archetype core card in a 5-card opening hand) and 16 searcher-text cards give it a reasonable chance to open a live engine. Seven hand traps and about eight negation effects give it real interruption capacity and a going-second plan. The deck has no recorded boards, so the ceiling and median are structural estimates only and are scored conservatively. Four Forbidden cards (three copies of Original Sinful Spoils - Snake-Eye and one each of Red-Eyes Dark Dragoon, Azamina Ilia Silvia and Baronne de Fleur) make the list Illegal, so the result is capped at 35 and is theoretical only. Popularity was not credited: archetype usage statistics confirm the list is real, not that it is strong.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange profile used as-is; Toolbox noted as secondary and not blended. Structural ≈ 51, Going First ≈ 55, Going Second ≈ 58, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 50. Modifiers: banlist exposure (Forbidden cards in-format) (-12). Final formula: Illegal deck: 0.80*Structural(51) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(50) - 12 (banlist exposure) = 39 raw, capped at 35 for theoretical/structural-only; Meta provisional

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.78 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Large searcher density (16 text hits) makes a T1 or T2 engine likely
• Seven hand traps and about eight negation effects give real interruption capacity
• Synchro boss access (Glaive Blaster, Over Dragonar, Chaos Angel) gives closing power on paper

Weaknesses

• Illegal in the OCG format due to four Forbidden cards
• No Side Deck registered, so best-of-3 adaptability is unknown
• Low archetype purity (25.5 percent exact name) across three engines
• No combo evidence for ceiling or median output

Critical choke points

• Dependence on the Synchro Extra Deck (9 Synchro monsters plus Synchro tuners)
• Snake-Eye and Horus engines depend on Forbidden Sinful Spoils and Azamina pieces that cannot be run

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Four Forbidden cards are run and the list is Illegal (legality block); Main 40 and Extra 15 are within size rules; Side is 0; Usage stats show the archetype core is present (T.G. archetype)
• Inferred: Opening-hand consistency estimates (hypergeometric); Hand trap and interaction read from card text; Going-first and going-second estimates
• Provisional: Meta Power (no dated metagame sample); Matchup fit and side plan
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent No Side Deck registered (side_count 0), so post-side cannot be scored Usage-statistics in_this_deck flags conflict with the card list: T.G. Hyper Librarian, T.G. Glaive Blaster and T.G. Recipro Dragonfly appear in the cards list but are flagged in_this_deck false No win-rate telemetry exists for this deck