Enneacraft Deck #774341 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 58/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Control
• Secondary strategies: Stun, Toolbox
• Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 14 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Burn via Enneapolis E.C. counters (900 damage per counter at End Phase) combined with ATK-3000 Pendulum monsters that destroy lower-ATK monsters at End of Battle Phase (Inferred from card text; the guide also describes burn and floodgates as the intended finish).; Board control through negations and Pendulum-zone destruction, then grinding with GY recursion (Inferred).
• Turn 1 (going first): Set up a Pendulum scale pair (scale data missing from the export, see data_gaps), then hold up negation and destruction effects while searching with the Level-1 'IA' Pendulum monsters.
• Turn 2 (going second): Use Enneacraft Reset, Reverth and Release to negate and rebuild from the GY, then convert with Enneapolis burn and the 3000-ATK Pendulum monsters (Inferred).
• Recovery: Recover from GY via Enneacraft Reset, Enneacraft Release and Enneacraft Reverth, plus the 900-LP search effects of the IA monsters (Inferred from excerpts).
• After siding: None: the deck runs 0 Side Deck cards, so there is no documented post-side plan.

Why it scores here

The score comes from the system as a whole: a 31-card Enneacraft core (77.5% of the Main Deck) with redundant copies gives a high chance of reaching the archetype core, and negation, Pendulum-zone destruction and GY recursion give layered interaction that holds up through disruption. The burn closer (Enneapolis) and the ATK-3000 Pendulum monsters supply a closing route, but no recorded boards exist, so the ceiling and median are text-based inference and the floor/median is held near neutral. The Extra Deck is a mixed toolbox of 14 single copies from other archetypes, with no Enneacraft-named Extra monster visible, which drags Extra efficiency and pilotability. There is no Side Deck, so there is no post-side plan, and the deck's popularity and usage statistics confirm it is a real, accessible list but did not add points. Card scores were not averaged into the deck score.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Control. Structural ≈ 61.6, Going First ≈ 66, Going Second ≈ 60, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 53. Modifiers: Engine conflict (-2); Compact core (1); No side deck (-1); Banlist exposure (0). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional); 0.80*61.6 + 0.20*53 = 59.9, then modifiers -2 = 57.9 → 58

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 1 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense archetype core (31 of 40 Main cards) with 3-copy redundancy on the Pendulum monsters
• Layered interaction: Pendulum destruction, negation spells, GY recursion and Enneapolis burn
• Recovery routes through Reset, Release and Reverth
• Legal list with no copy-limit violations

Weaknesses

• Extra Deck is 14 single-copy cards from nine other archetypes, with no Enneacraft-named Extra monster
• No Side Deck, so no post-side adaptability
• Engine needs a Pendulum scale pair that the export cannot confirm (scale 0 for all cards)
• Single Enneapolis (typical inclusion is 2 copies) makes the burn route fragile
• Heavy LP costs on IA monsters (900 each)

Critical choke points

• Enneapolis (1 copy) is the single burn and counter-placement piece
• Pendulum scale pair: unverified from export data
• Maxx C (1 copy) is the only hand trap for going second

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legal status and copy counts from legality (40 Main, 14 Extra, 0 Side); Banlist status for each card (only Maxx C is Limited, at 1 copy); Usage statistics: core list present at 15 of 17 cards (88.2%); Card text excerpts for the destruction, burn and LP-cost effects
• Inferred: Consistency estimates from hypergeometric draw odds; Negation and removal density read from card text; Burn closing via Enneapolis and Pendulum destruction; Going-first and going-second estimates; Pilotability read from the sequencing of effects
• Provisional: Meta Power (null); D13 matchup and format fit (neutral 50); Median output (no boards)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record are absent Pendulum scale is 0 for all Pendulum monsters in the export, so the scale pair cannot be checked No win-rate telemetry for going-first, going-second, matchups or starter rate Meta Power is Provisional without a dated metagame sample Card descriptions are truncated excerpts; full effect text is not available Guide evidence is a single Vietnamese snippet with no section structure