Regenesis Deck #773270 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 35/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox, Combo
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 45 / Extra 18 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 2 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Regenesis 2500-ATK/DEF enablers and Regenesis Lord/Sage/Dragon boards, backed by Red-Eyes Black Fullmetal Dragon (3400 ATK) and Azamina (4000 DEF) as extra-deck bosses; Fiendsmith Fusion/Link pressure (Rextremende, Desirae, Lacrima) and Mulcharmy draw-based value
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a 2500-ATK/DEF enabler plus a Regenesis searcher, Special Summon Regenesis Archfiend/Sage/Warrior, then search a Regenesis boss
• Turn 2 (going second): Use Ash Blossom, Infinite Impermanence or Maxx "C" to slow the opponent, then Regenesis Sage/Dragon plays through the board
• Recovery: Regenesis Birth, Regenesis Code and Incoming Machine! recycle the Regenesis cards from the GY; Fiendsmith Engraver and Tract provide a second engine
• After siding: No Side Deck is listed, so there is no post-side plan in this export

Why it scores here

The score comes from the deck as a system, not from averaging its cards. Searchers (16 copies) and the Regenesis core (archetype-core group P(≥1 in opening 5) ≈ 0.93) make a live starter likely on the going-first turn, and about 17 cards that reach 2500 ATK/DEF give several independent enablers. Hand traps (5 copies, P(≥1 in going-second 6) ≈ 0.53) and 10 negation and 15 removal text hits give the deck layered interaction. Conversion is inferred from card text only, because there are no recorded boards, so the ceiling and median are uncertain. Scores are held back by a scattered list (exact-name purity 14.3%, spread across Fiendsmith, Mulcharmy, Metalmorph, Red-Eyes, Azamina and others), no Side Deck, and an 18-card Extra Deck that exceeds the 15-card limit. Popularity did not add points; the Regenesis archetype's usage stats were used only to confirm the core cards.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 56.4, Going First ≈ 62, Going Second ≈ 50, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 48. Modifiers: Illegal Extra Deck size cap (-12). Final formula: Illegal legality cap: Structural 56.4 (Midrange profile); normal 0.80·Structural + 0.20·TournamentReliability = 54.7 is withheld and capped to 35 because the deck is illegal (Extra 18 > 15). Structural-only read; Meta provisional.

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.9 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.07 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• 16 searchers and a dense Regenesis enabler base give a likely going-first starter
• Layered interaction: 5 hand traps plus negation and removal text
• Multiple boss options at 3000-4000 ATK/DEF
• Good recursion through Regenesis Birth, Regenesis Code and Incoming Machine!

Weaknesses

• Illegal as built: 18 Extra Deck cards against a 15 maximum
• Scattered engine: exact-name purity 14.3% across several sub-archetypes
• No Side Deck, so no post-side adaptation
• High pilot complexity with long Regenesis and Fiendsmith chains
• No recorded boards, so conversion is untested

Critical choke points

• Regenesis enablers (2500 ATK/DEF) must be present for most lines
• Extra Deck overflow must be fixed before the list can be played
• Limited cards (Fiendsmith's Lacrima, Engraver, Tract, Maxx "C", Crossout Designator, S:P Little Knight) at one copy each leave no redundancy

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Main Deck 45 cards (legal range 40-60); Extra Deck 18 cards, above the OCG maximum of 15 (size_warnings: extra 18 > 15); All Limited and Semi-Limited copy counts are within legal limits; Exact-name purity 14.3% (9 of 63 archetype-linked copies); Archetype usage: 9 of 14 usage-stat core cards present
• Inferred: Opening-hand starter and core probabilities from hypergeometric estimates; Interaction and recursion roles from card text; Going-first versus going-second hand quality
• Provisional: Meta and format fit (no dated sample or tournament link); Side Deck adaptability (no Side Deck)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied; combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link, so archetype meta-share and per-pilot records are absent No win-rate telemetry, so going-first, going-second and matchup rates are Unknown Meta Power is Provisional without a dated metagame sample No guides attached for the archetype Title is null; the deck is identified by its archetype and id only