Azamina Deck #772938 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 25/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox, Combo
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 3 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Extra Deck link/synchro/xyz boss monsters (Jurrac Meteor, Garunix Eternity, Snake-Eyes Flamberge Dragon, Worldsea Dragon Zealantis) overwhelming a board after Fire King and Snake-Eye engine starts; Fire King negation and removal interaction (Ash Blossom, Fire King Avatar Arvata, Fire King Avatar Rangbali) converting into a Link/Synchro end-board
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a searcher (Fossil Dig, Ulcanix, Snake-Eye Oak, Bonfire) and start a Fire King or Snake-Eye engine, then Link or Synchro Summon an Extra boss; no Azamina core card is present to anchor the plan
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold Ash Blossom and Droll & Lock Bird as hand traps against the opponent's first summon or search, then rebuild through the Snake-Eye or Fire King searcher chain into a boss monster
• Recovery: Rebuild from the GY using Snake-Eye and Fire King recursion (Flamberge Dragon, Garunix, Sinful Spoils) while the Extra Deck supplies links
• After siding: No side deck is registered (0 side cards), so there is no post-side plan; the list cannot adapt between games of a best-of-three

Why it scores here

This list is Illegal in OCG: three cards exceed their copy limits (Ash Blossom 3 vs 2, WANTED 2 vs 1, and the Forbidden Original Sinful Spoils - Snake-Eye), so it is scored only as a theoretical structural read and the final value is capped low. Structurally it is a Fire King, Snake-Eye, Jurrac, Diabellstar and Charmer pile, not an Azamina deck: no Azamina card is run, exact-name archetype purity is 0%, and 3 of 10 usage core cards are present. The engine is well served by 18 searchers (P of at least one in an opening 5 ≈ 0.96), and the Extra Deck supplies strong end-board bosses (2500–3000 ATK), so the floor of the system is respectable if the lines connect. The score comes from consistency, interaction (Ash, Droll, Arvata, Rangbali) and end-board pressure on the system, not from the Azamina name or from averaging card scores. With no combos, no side deck and no meta data, the median and matchup dimensions remain Provisional.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 45.3, Going First ≈ 48, Going Second ≈ 46, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 40. Modifiers: banlist exposure (-4); engine conflict (-4); no Side Deck (-2). Final formula: Illegal deck: theoretical structural-only read, capped low. Structural 45.3 with modifiers totalling -10 gives a raw value of about 34; capped to 25. Meta provisional.

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.34 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• 18 searchers give high starter access (P≈0.96 for at least one searcher in an opening 5)
• Strong Extra Deck end-board ATK (2500–3000)
• Layered interaction from Ash Blossom, Droll and the Fire King negates

Weaknesses

• Illegal in OCG: three copy-limit violations including a Forbidden card
• No Azamina core card, so the archetype label does not describe the list
• No side deck, so no post-side adaptation

Critical choke points

• Ash Blossom and Droll as the only hand traps (P≥1 in going-second 6 ≈ 0.49)
• Single Fire King Garunix and Snake-Eyes Flamberge Dragon lines with no alternative boss
• Legal list must cut Forbidden Snake-Eye Sinful Spoils and reduce Ash and WANTED to legal copy counts before the deck can be scored normally

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Illegal status: Ash Blossom 3 vs 2 legal copies, WANTED 2 vs 1, Original Sinful Spoils 1 vs 0 (Forbidden); Size 40 main / 15 extra / 0 side is within OCG size rules; 0% exact-name Azamina purity; 3 of 10 usage core cards present
• Inferred: Starter access ≈ 0.96 via searchers and 0.34 for single-copy engine cards; Interaction density from Ash, Droll, Arvata and Rangbali text
• Provisional: Meta and format fit (no dated meta sample); Median and ceiling output (no recorded boards)
• Data gaps: no combos supplied — combo floor/median/ceiling is text-only inference no tournament link — archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent no win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN (going-first/second, matchup, game-level, brick/starter/OTK rates) — those signals are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied deck has no title and no side deck no Azamina core cards in the list despite the Azamina archetype label