Harpie Deck #772256 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 35/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 52 / Extra 16 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 4 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Xyz pressure from Ryzeal and Dododo/Gagaga-style boards into high-ATK Xyz such as Ryzeal Detonator, Kali Yuga, Eschatos and Number 104 (theoretical; no combos recorded); Recovery of Xyz materials and hand-trap-supported boards (Inferred from text)
• Turn 1 (going first): Search through Gogogo Goblindbergh, Dododo Warrior or Onomatopaira into a Level 4 or Xyz line; hold hand traps for the opponent's first activation (Inferred)
• Turn 2 (going second): Use the 16 hand traps (Ash Blossom, Ghost Ogre, Effect Veiler, Infinite Impermanence, Droll and others) to stop the opponent's first board, then Xyz through the remaining monsters (Inferred)
• Recovery: Rebuild from the GY via Ryzeal Cross, Ext Ryzeal and Dodododwarf Gogogoglove revival effects (Inferred from text)
• After siding: Not evaluable: the Side Deck is empty (0 cards), so there is no post-side plan

Why it scores here

The list is a 52-card Main Deck of Xyz and Level 4 searchers with 18 searcher-text cards (about 89% chance of at least one in a 5-card opening hand, Inferred), so the engine is usually reachable on turn 1 or 2. Its interaction is the strongest part: 16 hand traps and several on-field answers give several independent ways to stop an opponent's first board, which earns the going-second and interaction scores. Because the list breaks the copy limits and the Extra Deck cap, it is capped at 35 under the Illegal rule and gets no normal Final Contextual score. The score comes from consistency and interaction on the system, not from the popularity of the Harpie label (no Harpie-named cards are in the list) and not from averaging individual card scores. Combo evidence is absent, so floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference and the uncertainty is wide.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 53, Going First ≈ 48, Going Second ≈ 62, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 40. Modifiers: Banlist exposure (-4); Empty side deck (-2); Unrecoverable choke point (-4). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + modifiers (-10) = 40.4, then capped at 35 because the list is Illegal (Step 2: no normal Final Contextual score). Meta provisional.

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.89 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense hand-trap and negation suite (16 hand traps, 14 negation-text cards)
• High searcher density (18 cards) gives a reliable opening
• Strong Xyz closers at Extra Deck level (Kali Yuga, Eschatos, Ryzeal Detonator)

Weaknesses

• Illegal list: 3 cards over their copy limits and Extra Deck of 16 over the 15 maximum
• Harpie label does not match the list; no Harpie-named cards are present
• Empty Side Deck, so no post-side plan
• No recorded combos or win-rate data to confirm the engine works

Critical choke points

• Ryzeal Detonator, Ext Ryzeal and Sword Ryzeal are single-copy Limited cards that anchor the Ryzeal Xyz line
• Opening with only one searcher-text card leaves the hand dependent on Xyz material
• Seventh Tachyon and Ice Ryzeal would have to be cut to make the list legal, which removes engine depth

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Main Deck 52 and Extra Deck 16 counts; Three copy-limit violations (Seventh Tachyon 3/1, Ash Blossom 3/2, Ice Ryzeal 2/1); Extra Deck 16 exceeds OCG maximum 15; Side Deck has 0 cards; Archetype spread contains no Harpie-named cards
• Inferred: Hand-trap density (16) and searcher density (18) give a consistent going-second plan; Opening-hand probabilities (0.89 searcher, 0.90 hand trap) estimate consistency; Interaction quality read from card text and role tags
• Provisional: Meta Power and format fit (no dated metagame sample); Tournament reliability (no tournament link)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied, so floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link, so archetype meta-share and per-pilot records are absent No win-rate telemetry (going-first/second, matchup, brick and starter rates) Meta Power is provisional without a dated metagame sample Side Deck is empty, so post-side performance cannot be assessed Archetype label Harpie does not match the list contents