Regenesis Deck #772189 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Stun, Toolbox
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 54 / Extra 11 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 3 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Regenesis 2500-ATK/DEF enablers (Regenesis Archfiend, Dragon, Warrior, Sage, Lord) recurring through the Regenesis engine into board pressure; Extra Deck fusion and link threats (Garura, Tri-Brigade Arms Bucephalus II, Starving Venom) when the 2500 enabler line is blocked
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a Regenesis monster or Regenesis Archfiend, use a 2500-enabler to Special Summon the next 2500 body, then protect the board with Ash Blossom and Droll-style hand traps
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold 2-3 hand traps (Ash Blossom, Ghost Ogre, Ghost Belle, Droll and Lock Bird) to break the opponent starter, then rebuild with Regenesis Code and Regenesis Birth
• Recovery: Recurse Regenesis monsters and spells from the Graveyard via Regenesis Code and the Regenesis GY effects; rebuild with 2500-ATK enablers from the Deck
• After siding: Not evaluable: the deck runs no Side Deck, so there is no post-side plan

Why it scores here

The score comes from the deck as a system, not from averaging card scores or from Regenesis being a popular archetype. The engine reliably finds an archetype core card in the opening hand (about 94 percent, Inferred), and the 2500-ATK/DEF enabler chain gives it a clear route to a board. Interaction is dense: about 12 hand traps, 11 negation-text cards and 29 removal-text cards give the deck a strong end-board and a good going-second plan. The score is held down by the hard copy-limit violations (Ash Blossom and Super Polymerization each run 3 copies against a limit of 2), which make the list illegal, so the result is a structural-only estimate capped at 30. There is no recorded combo data, no tournament link, and no side deck, so the floor, median and post-side scores are low-confidence estimates.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 57.5, Going First ≈ 58, Going Second ≈ 62, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 45. Modifiers: Banlist exposure (-3); No side deck (-3); Enabler dependence (-2); Illegal copy-limit cap (0). Final formula: Illegal cap: theoretical/structural-only. Uncapped 0.80*57.5 + 0.20*45 + modifiers(-8) = 47; capped at 30 because the deck exceeds copy limits. Meta provisional (null).

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.94 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.06 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Archetype core is near-certain to appear in the opening hand (about 94 percent)
• Dense, layered interaction: about 12 hand traps and many negation and removal effects
• Good going-second disruption with redundant hand traps
• Multiple 2500-ATK enablers give real board pressure
• Recursion via Regenesis Code and GY effects supports a grind

Weaknesses

• Illegal copy-limit list (Ash Blossom x3 and Super Polymerization x3)
• Empty Side Deck, so no post-side adaptation
• Low archetype purity (18.5 percent exact name), with a lot of tech and off-archetype cards
• No recorded combos or tournament results to confirm the plan works
• Several Extra Deck staples are missing (Super Starslayer TY-PHON, S:P Little Knight)

Critical choke points

• The 2500-ATK/DEF enabler condition: if the opponent removes the first 2500 body, the Regenesis line stalls
• Copy-limit fix required before any production score is meaningful
• Hand dependence on one archetype core card in the opening hand

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality: Illegal (Ash Blossom and Super Polymerization each run 3 copies, limit 2); Main 54 and Extra 11 within OCG size rules; Side Deck is empty; Banlist status of 7 Limited and 2 Semi-Limited cards
• Inferred: Archetype core opening-hand probability about 0.94; Hand-trap redundancy and going-second disruption (about 0.80 for at least one hand trap in 6); Regenesis recursion as a grind route; Interaction density from card text
• Provisional: Meta Power and matchup fit (no dated meta sample; archetype share unavailable)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied, so floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link, so archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record are absent No win-rate telemetry in YGOVN for going-first, going-second, matchup, brick or starter rates Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied Deck title is null in the export, so the deck name is unknown