Regenesis Deck #770833 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 59/100 (±6 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Midrange, Toolbox
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Chain 2500-original-stat monsters from hand and Deck, then convert with Extra Deck Synchro, Fusion and Link summons and 2500-ATK bodies such as Regenesis Lord, Overlord and Dragon.; Regenesis recursion (Regenesis Code, Birth, Cycle) plus Extra Deck pressure, with Nibiru and Maxx "C" as hand-trap disruption.
• Turn 1 (going first): Open with a searcher (Nadir Servant, Regenesis Archfiend or Sage) and a 2500-stat enabler, then Regenesis or Regenesis Code into a Regenesis 2500-body and Extra Deck summons.
• Turn 2 (going second): Use Nibiru, Maxx "C", Droll & Lock Bird or Regenesis Sage/Gallant Bandit negation to disrupt the opponent's summons, then rebuild the 2500-stat chain from the GY and Deck.
• Recovery: Regenesis Birth, Regenesis Cycle and Regenesis Code recur 2500-stat monsters from the GY, and Archfiend Heiress and Mulcharmy Fuwalos refill the hand.
• After siding: No Side Deck is registered, so there is no post-side plan; the deck cannot adapt between games.

Why it scores here

The deck reliably opens a functional engine: the archetype core (20 copies) gives about 98% chance of at least one Regenesis card in a 5-card opening hand, and 15 searcher-text cards give about 92% (Inferred hypergeometric estimates). It converts that opening into board presence through about 17 main-deck copies of 2500-original-stat enablers, which fits the Regenesis chain, and it has a broad Extra Deck (6 Synchro, 5 Fusion, 4 Link) for pressure. It survives disruption through several independent starters, recursion from the GY, and four hand-trap cards, though going second depends on those hand traps and their 49% chance of at least one hit in six cards. Popularity did not earn points: Regenesis usage stats only confirm the list is real and accessible. The score is from consistency, floor/median output and interaction on the system, not from averaging card scores; the absence of recorded boards and any Side Deck keeps the score moderate.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 67, Going First ≈ 68, Going Second ≈ 66, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 58. Modifiers: Extra Deck summon locks conflict with Extra-heavy build (-3); No Side Deck (-2); Banlist exposure (-1). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers (Meta provisional, no dated metagame sample)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.98 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.02 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Very high probability of opening a Regenesis card or searcher (Inferred)
• Several independent starters and GY recursion give redundancy (Inferred)
• Strong 2500-stat and Extra Deck closing bodies (Verified stats)

Weaknesses

• No Side Deck, so no post-side plan (Verified)
• Extra Deck summon locks conflict with the Extra-heavy build (Inferred)
• No recorded boards, so ceiling and median are text-only (Inferred)

Critical choke points

• Ability to see a 2500-stat enabler early, because most engine lines depend on one
• Hand-trap coverage for going second (~49% at least one in 6 cards)

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legal in OCG: 40 Main, 15 Extra, 0 Side; four Limited cards each at 1 copy; Extra Deck breakdown 6 Synchro, 5 Fusion, 4 Link; Copy histogram 16 singletons, 2 two-of, 6 three-of; Archetype core 20 copies; usage: Regenesis Archfiend, Sage, Warrior, Dragon, Birth in 82% of stats
• Inferred: Opening-hand probabilities (hypergeometric, Main Deck only); Engine consistency and brick risk from copy counts and card text; Interaction and recursion quality from card text
• Provisional: Meta power and matchup fit: no dated metagame sample or tournament link
• Data gaps: no combos supplied; combo floor/median/ceiling is text-only inference no tournament link; archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent no win-rate telemetry (going-first/second, matchup, brick/starter rates) no Side Deck, so post-side adaptability cannot be measured usage stat marks S:P Little Knight in_this_deck=false while the card list shows 1 copy in Extra; possible ref mismatch