Raidraptor Deck #766504 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Combo, Toolbox
• Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 60 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Illegal. 1 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Xyz/Link boss pressure from Raidraptor and Kali Yuga-style Xyz/Link extra-deck monsters, reached through Rank-Up-Magic and Snake-Eye board swarming (Inferred from card text); Snake-Eye Flamberge Dragon and Kashtira/Diabellstar follow-up boards (Inferred)
• Turn 1 (going first): Open on a Snake-Eyes Poplar or Snake-Eye Ash searcher line into a Snake-Eye engine; hold Ash Blossom and Forbidden Droplet for the first activation (Inferred)
• Turn 2 (going second): Use Droll & Lock Bird, Maxx C, Ash Blossom and Nibiru as hand traps while the first Snake-Eye or Raidraptor Xyz line is still forming (Inferred)
• Recovery: Recover through Raidraptor and Snake-Eye GY-to-field effects and Rank-Up-Magic searches; depends on Extra Deck material survival (Inferred)
• After siding: Not evaluable: the deck runs no Side Deck, so there is no post-side plan

Why it scores here

This list is Illegal in Master Duel because Snake-Eyes Poplar is run three times against a Limited copy limit of one, so it is capped low and the score is theoretical/structural only. Structurally the deck can reliably reach a searcher (P of at least one searcher in a 5-card hand is about 0.92, Inferred) and has a real interaction suite (13 negation-text and 19 removal-text cards, 8 hand traps, Inferred from card text). Its weaknesses are a split identity across Raidraptor, Snake-Eye, Adventurer, Kashtira, Diabellstar and PSY-Frame, with only 8 of 60 main-deck cards carrying the exact Raidraptor name (10.7 percent purity), and 31 singleton slots that raise brick risk. No combos, median output, or post-side data exist, so ceiling and median scores stay near neutral and Meta Power is provisional. Popularity and guide coverage were not counted as power, and the score was not derived by averaging card scores.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange primary, Combo secondary (about 80/20 by intent; Inferred, not an exact blend). Structural ≈ 53, Going First ≈ 52, Going Second ≈ 55, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 40. Modifiers: Engine conflicts (-4); No side deck (-3). Final formula: Illegal cap applied: 0.80*Structural(53) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(40) + ContextModifiers(-7) = 43.4, then capped to 30 for Illegal status (theoretical/structural only)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.92 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense searcher and recursion text supports consistent access to the engine
• Layered negation and removal suite (8 hand traps plus Droll and Lock Bird, Dimensional Barrier, Crossout Designator)
• Strong Extra Deck boss options with high ATK (Arsenal Falcon, Kali Yuga, Flamberge Dragon)

Weaknesses

• Illegal in Master Duel: Snake-Eyes Poplar runs 3 copies against a Limited limit of 1
• Low archetype purity (10.7 percent exact Raidraptor name) and many off-archetype starters
• No Side Deck, so no best-of-3 plan
• 31 singleton main-deck slots raise brick and conflicting-hand risk

Critical choke points

• Snake-Eyes Poplar over-limit copies make the list unplayable as built
• Dependence on Extra Deck Xyz/Link material for the main offensive line

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Deck is Illegal: Snake-Eyes Poplar 3 copies, legal limit 1 (Master Duel); Main 60 and Extra 15 are within size rules; Side 0; Exact-name archetype purity 10.7 percent; 67 off-archetype copies; Droll and Lock Bird legal at 2 copies (Semi-Limited)
• Observed: No observed combo boards or win-rate telemetry exist for this deck
• Inferred: Searcher access probability (about 0.92) and Raidraptor core group (about 0.78) from hypergeometric estimates; Negation and removal breadth from card text; Engine conflict and brick risk from archetype spread; Going-first and going-second plans from card text
• Provisional: Meta Power (no dated metagame sample); Matchup fit (no tournament or matchup data); Tournament reliability
• Data gaps: Illegal copy count prevents a normal Final Contextual score No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and match record absent No win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN Usage statistics mark several cards present in the extra list (for example Raidraptor Force Strix, Arsenal Falcon, Kali Yuga) as in_this_deck false, so usage matching is inconsistent and was not used for core scoring Deck title is null