Enneacraft Deck #765428 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 55/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Stun
• Secondary strategies: Control, Midrange
• Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 43 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Pendulum Enneacraft boards (3000 ATK Asta/Atori/Atil/Archa/Aiza) plus E.C.-counter burn through Enneapolis, with Extra-Deck Xyz/Synchro bosses as the finishers.; Enneapolis end-phase burn (900 per E.C. counter) on a board that floods the opponent with Pendulum monsters.
• Turn 1 (going first): Turn 1: a searcher (Ekto/Proto/Deftero/Trito/Enato tromarIA-series, reveal-3 for a Pendulum Enneacraft) or Enneacraft Release to set the Pendulum Zones, then Enneapolis to start the E.C. counter engine and lock the opponent's summons.
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold Maxx "C" and Enneacraft Reset or Reverth from the GY to negate or respond to the opponent's first summons and stop their board while rebuilding the Pendulum Zones.
• Recovery: Recycle from the GY: Enneacraft Reverth shuffles Enneacraft monsters back and draws; Enneacraft Release and Reset recur from the GY; the five reveal-3 searchers refill the hand.
• After siding: No side deck is registered, so there is no post-side plan; the list depends entirely on its main deck.

Why it scores here

The deck reliably opens an Enneacraft engine: the 31 archetype-core copies give P(at least one in a 5-card hand) ≈ 0.999, and the five reveal-3 searchers plus Enneacraft Release search the Pendulum starters (Inferred). Its strongest dimension is interaction: 13 negation-text and 28 removal-text cards, Maxx "C", and the Enneacraft Reset/Reverth recursion on the opponent's activations and summons give layered answers (Inferred, semantic read). Conversion and median output cannot be measured because no recorded boards exist, so the combo dimensions rest on text and are held near the middle. The score is pulled down by the absent side deck, a 55% exact-archetype purity with 26 off-archetype copies, and a thin Extra Deck of mixed archetypes. Popularity and the single archetype-usage stat did not earn points, and no card scores were averaged.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Stun primary; Control secondary (not separately weighted). Structural ≈ 59.3, Going First ≈ 64, Going Second ≈ 56, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 58. Modifiers: No side deck (-2); Archetype purity below 60% (-2). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional) + ContextModifiers(-4)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 1 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Archetype core is near-certain in the opening hand (P ≈ 0.999 for 31 copies)
• Dense negation and removal text across the Main Deck
• Recursion from the GY (Reverth, Release, Reset) plus five reveal-3 searchers

Weaknesses

• No side deck for post-side adaptation
• Off-archetype copies and generic tech dilute the engine
• Thin Extra Deck with few Enneacraft bosses

Critical choke points

• Pendulum Zone setup: the Enneacraft lines need a Pendulum scale pair, and the evidence carries no scale data (scale 0 everywhere)
• Single Maxx "C" as the only going-second hand trap

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Main 43 and Extra 15 within the Master Duel size rules; Maxx "C" and Rivalry of Warlords each run 1 copy, at the Limited legal count; Archetype purity 55.2%
• Inferred: P(≥1 Enneacraft core card in hand) ≈ 0.999; Interaction density from negation and removal text; Going-first and going-second splits from text and probability
• Provisional: Meta Power (null, no dated metagame sample); Format fit score (no tournament link)
• Data gaps: no combos supplied — combo floor/median/ceiling is text-only inference no tournament link — archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent no win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN — going-first/second, matchup and brick rates are Inferred or Unknown Pendulum scale is 0 for every card in the export, so the Pendulum line cannot be verified Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied