Enneacraft Deck #765079 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 61/100 (±6 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Control
• Secondary strategies: Stun, Toolbox
• Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 43 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Pendulum-zone Enneacraft monsters (Asta, Atori, Atil, Archa, Aiza at 3000 ATK) break the board, and Enneapolis E.C. counters burn the opponent for 900 per counter; Extra Deck boss monsters (Juraishin, Psychic End Punisher, Divine Arsenal, Laevatein) once the board is locked
• Turn 1 (going first): Set the Pendulum Zones with Enneacraft Pendulum monsters, lay Enneapolis and floodgates (Dimensional Fissure, Rivalry of Warlords) to restrict the opponent's summons, and keep Pendulum flip effects as the answer to their first board
• Turn 2 (going second): Use Maxx "C" as the single hand trap to draw off the opponent's summons, then rebuild through Enneacraft Release/Reset and Pendulum effects while keeping floodgates active
• Recovery: Recover from GY through Enneacraft Release and Enneacraft Reverth (banish from GY to add or summon) and Pendulum searches that cost 900 LP
• After siding: No side deck in the export; post-side plan not evaluable (Provisional)

Why it scores here

The deck reliably opens its Enneacraft core: 31 copies of the archetype core give an estimated 99.9% chance of at least one core card in a 5-card opening hand, and 15 searcher-text cards add redundancy for the Pendulum engine. Its strongest system-level trait is interaction, with 28 removal-text, 13 negation-text and 4 floodgate cards that together lock the opponent's summons and effects, which is why D7 is the highest dimension. Conversion is credible but unmeasured, since no boards were recorded and the ceiling and median are text-only inference, so D3 and D4 stay moderate. Going-second strength is limited by a single hand trap and no side deck, which lowers D8, D12 and the going-second estimate. Popularity and archetype usage stats confirm the list is real, but they did not earn points; the score comes from consistency, resource recovery and interaction on the system, not from averaging the individual card scores.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Control. Structural ≈ 63.5, Going First ≈ 66, Going Second ≈ 56, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 58. Modifiers: side_deck_absent (-3); engine compactness (2); limited_key_cards (0). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional); Structural 63.5, TR 58, modifiers -1 → 61

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 1 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Core engine is near-guaranteed to be present in the opening hand (31 copies)
• Layered interaction: removal text, negation text and four floodgates
• Recovery through GY recursion (Release, Reset, Reverth) and LP-paid searches
• Five 3000-ATK level-9 Pendulum monsters give a strong endboard

Weaknesses

• No side deck in the export, so no post-side adaptability
• Only one hand trap for going second
• Extra Deck is flexible but largely generic, with little archetype-specific coherence
• No recorded combos, so the ceiling and median are unverified

Critical choke points

• Pendulum Zone setup: without a live Pendulum scale pair the engine stalls
• Floodgate ordering: Dimensional Fissure and Rivalry of Warlords need to land before the opponent develops

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Main 43, Extra 15, Side 0 are within master-duel size rules (40–60 main, 0–15 extra, 0–15 side); Maxx "C" and Rivalry of Warlords are Limited at 1 copy each, legal; Archetype core: 31 copies; exact-name purity 55.2%
• Observed: Usage stats: Enneacraft core cards at 80–100% inclusion across tracked decks
• Inferred: P(≥1 core card in 5-card hand) ≈ 0.999; Engine accessibility and interaction density from card text; Going-first and going-second estimates from hand-trap count and floodgate timing
• Provisional: Meta Power (no dated metagame sample); Matchup fit (no tournament link); Post-side plan (no side deck)
• Data gaps: no combos supplied — combo floor/median/ceiling is text-only inference no side deck in the export — post-side adaptability cannot be scored no tournament link — archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent no win-rate telemetry — going-first/second, matchup and brick rates are Inferred Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied deck title is null in the export