Enneacraft Deck #762177 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 59/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Control
• Secondary strategies: Stun
• Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 45 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Pendulum boss monsters (Asta, Atori, Atil at 3000 ATK) that destroy monsters with lower ATK, plus Enneapolis E.C. counters converted into burn damage at the End Phase; Synchro, Xyz and Link Extra Deck finishers (Psychic End Punisher, Golden Cloud Beast, Downerd Magician) once the board is cleared
• Turn 1 (going first): Place Enneacraft Pendulum monsters, search through Ekto, Enato, Proto and Trito, and hold Infinite Impermanence, Ash Blossom, Effect Veiler and Maxx C for the opponent's first summon or activation
• Turn 2 (going second): Use the hand traps (Ash Blossom, Effect Veiler, Maxx C, Infinite Impermanence, roughly 80% to hold at least one in six cards) to break the opponent's first board, then establish Enneapolis negation and Pendulum bosses
• Recovery: Recycle from the GY with Enneacraft Reset and Enneacraft Release, re-set Pendulum monsters, and rebuild with the Extra Deck Synchro, Xyz and Link monsters
• After siding: Master Duel has no sideboard (side_count 0), so there is no post-side plan; adaptation is limited to the main-deck build

Why it scores here

Enneacraft opens reliably: about 99.8% of hands contain at least one archetype card, and 23 Pendulum monsters plus 17 searcher-text cards keep the engine live by turn one or two (Inferred from hypergeometric estimates). Its real strength is interaction on the system: 10 hand traps (Ash Blossom, Effect Veiler, Infinite Impermanence, Maxx C) and 22 negation-text cards, with roughly an 80% chance of a hand trap in a going-second six-card hand, give it layered answers that recover through Enneapolis, Reset and Release. It converts through 3000 ATK Pendulum bosses that destroy lower-ATK monsters and through End Phase E.C. damage, but no recorded boards exist, so the combo ceiling and median are text-based inferences and are scored conservatively. The score comes from consistency, interruption resilience and endboard interaction on the whole list, not from averaging card scores and not from archetype popularity; Master Duel has no sideboard, so the side-deck dimension is scored low and marked as a gap, and the meta is provisional.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Control. Structural ≈ 62, Going First ≈ 70, Going Second ≈ 66, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 58. Modifiers: Archetype core deviation (-2); Engine conflicts (-1). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers (Meta provisional/null); Structural uses the Control profile with D13 dropped and weights renormalized to 93 (62.5 before rounding to 62); 0.8*62.5 + 0.2*58 = 61.6, then modifiers -3 gives 58.6, rounded to 59

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 1 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Near-certain opening access to the archetype engine (Inferred)
• Ten hand traps and 22 negation-text cards give layered interaction, with about 80% hand-trap access when going second (Inferred)
• Recursion through Enneacraft Reset and Release supports recovery after interruption (Inferred)
• Coherent Pendulum core with 23 Pendulum monsters and a legal, complete list

Weaknesses

• No recorded boards, so the combo ceiling and median cannot be measured
• Deviates from the archetype core (48% of core cards present), so the list is likely a variant
• No sideboard, so no post-side adaptation
• Dependence on Pendulum-zone access that the export does not confirm (scale not supplied)
• Lower offensive closing power than its interaction suite

Critical choke points

• Pendulum-zone setup (scale unknown in the export) gates the boss monsters and the Enneapolis effects
• Enneapolis on the field is the central negation and burn engine
• The Extra Deck Synchro, Xyz and Link lines depend on the Pendulum core being present

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legal status: 45 main, 15 extra, 0 side, all copy counts within the limit, Maxx C 1/1 Limited; Card text and structural composition (type, attribute, level, ATK, DEF); Archetype usage: 12 of 25 core cards present, 48%
• Observed: Guide describes the deck as a control deck that burns the opponent and locks heavily, with no turn-one combo
• Inferred: At least one archetype card in a 5-card opener is about 99.8% (hypergeometric); Hand trap in six cards going second is about 80%; Interaction, recursion and endboard quality scores read from card text; Going-first and going-second power from the component dimensions
• Provisional: Meta Power is null because no dated metagame sample is supplied; Matchup fit and side-deck adaptability are provisional
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record are absent No win-rate telemetry in YGOVN (going-first, going-second, matchup, brick, starter rates) Meta Power is provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied Pendulum scale not supplied in the card export, so Pendulum-zone access is assumed Master Duel has no sideboard, so there is no post-side evidence