Enneacraft Deck #761636 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 62/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Control
• Secondary strategies: Stun
• Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 45 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Burn finish via Enneapolis E.C. Counter damage (900 per counter) and 3000-ATK Enneacraft Pendulum monsters that destroy lower-ATK opposing monsters; Lock the opponent out with negations and Enneacraft Reset / Enneapolis effects, then attack with the Enneacraft Extra-Deck and Pendulum boards
• Turn 1 (going first): Set Pendulum scales with Enneacraft Release or Ekto/Enato/Proto/Deftero/Trito searches, hold Infinite Impermanence and Ash Blossom up, and keep Enneapolis-based negation available for the opponent's first board
• Turn 2 (going second): Use the six-card hand's hand traps (Ash Blossom, Infinite Impermanence, Droll & Lock Bird, Maxx "C") to answer the opponent's first summon, then rebuild the Pendulum zones from the deck with the searchers
• Recovery: Enneacraft Reset and Enneacraft Release recur from the GY and banish, and Enneapolis resets the field-level negation, so the deck can rebuild after its hand traps are spent
• After siding: No side deck is run (0 side cards, which is legal in Master Duel); there is no post-side plan to evaluate.

Why it scores here

The deck reliably opens an Enneacraft board: the archetype core is 31 copies, and the hypergeometric estimate of at least one archetype card in a five-card opening hand is about 0.998, so its engine is almost always live (Inferred). Its interaction is the strongest part of the system: 19 negation-text cards and 29 removal-text cards, layered with 8 hand traps, give a high end-board quality score that holds across turns. Going second, the six-card hand has about a 71% chance of containing a hand trap, which supports the going-second score. The deck has no parseable recorded boards, so its combo ceiling and median output are text-based inference only and score in the middle; its offensive closing power is moderate, leaning on Enneapolis burn and 3000-ATK Pendulum monsters rather than on a demonstrated combo. Popularity and archetype usage were not counted as power, and card scores were not averaged into the deck score.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Control. Structural ≈ 64, Going First ≈ 68, Going Second ≈ 62, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 62. Modifiers: Banlist exposure (-1); Off-archetype dilution (-1). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional); Structural 64.2, TR 62, modifiers -2 → 62

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 1 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Archetype core is almost always opened (≈0.998 in a 5-card hand)
• Layered interaction: 8 hand traps plus Pendulum and Reset negations
• Recovery from GY and banish via Enneacraft Reset and Release
• Compact 20-distinct-card Main Deck with high copy counts on the core

Weaknesses

• No recorded boards, so the combo ceiling and median are unmeasured
• 29 of 60 copies are off-archetype, diluting engine coherence
• Offense depends on Pendulum and Enneapolis burn, which is slow
• Extra Deck has 15 singletons with several off-plan picks

Critical choke points

• Pendulum zone setup: a broken scale line leaves the Pendulum engine offline
• Heavy reliance on hand traps for going-second answers

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality: 45 Main, 15 Extra, 0 Side within Master Duel size rules; Restricted cards within legal copies: Maxx "C" 1/1, Droll & Lock Bird 1/2, The Fallen & The Virtuous 2/2; Archetype core copies: 31 exact Enneacraft names
• Observed: Usage statistics: Enneacraft core cards at 100% inclusion; 13 of 25 core cards present
• Inferred: Archetype engine consistency ≈ 0.998 in a 5-card opening hand (hypergeometric); Hand-trap going-second at-least-one ≈ 0.71; Control with Stun secondary read from negation and removal text; Burn-and-lock win plan from the guide and card text
• Provisional: Meta Power (no dated sample); Matchup/format fit (D13); Side-deck adaptability (D12, no side cards)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied; combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record are absent No win-rate telemetry for going-first/second, matchup, brick or OTK rates Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied No side deck present; side adaptability cannot be evaluated