Enneacraft Deck #756362 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 60/100 (±6 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Stun, Toolbox
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Pendulum-zone Enneacraft monsters (Atori, Asta, Atil, Archa, 3000 ATK) plus Extra Deck boss monsters, with destroy effects that clear the board; Extra Deck bosses such as Divine Arsenal AA-ZEUS, Black Luster Soldier and Worldsea Dragon Zealantis once the board is open
• Turn 1 (going first): Pendulum-scale setup and an Enneacraft searcher (tromarIA, orgIA, alazoneIA, exapatisIA, oknirIA) to reach a 9-level Enneacraft Pendulum, while keeping Enneapolis and Enneacraft Reset up to negate
• Turn 2 (going second): Hand traps (Ash Blossom, Maxx C, Droll and Lock Bird, Evenly Matched) to stop the opponent's first summon or draw, then rebuild through the Pendulum Zones and Enneacraft Release from the GY
• Recovery: Enneacraft Release and Enneacraft Reverth recursion from the GY, plus Pendulum searchers that cost 900 LP to add another Enneacraft card
• After siding: No side deck is registered in the export, so there is no post-side plan to evaluate

Why it scores here

The deck reliably opens a functional Pendulum plan: the 33 archetype-core copies give a 99% chance of at least one in an opening 5-card hand, and the 14 searcher-text cards give about 78%. Conversion relies on 3000-ATK Enneacraft Pendulums and Extra Deck bosses, and there are no recorded boards, so the ceiling and median are text-based and labelled Inferred. Survival is supported by seven hand-trap copies, Enneacraft Reset, and GY recursion through Release and Reverth, which keeps the engine going after disruption. The score comes from consistency, interaction, and resilience on the whole system, not from averaging card scores; the Enneacraft archetype is popular, but that popularity earned no points, and the lack of a side deck and of any meta sample capped the result.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo primary with Stun secondary; the Combo weight profile is applied as the base. Structural ≈ 66, Going First ≈ 66, Going Second ≈ 60, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 55. Modifiers: no side deck (-2); Extra Deck lacks archetype cards (-1). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional); Structural 65.56 gives 52.45 + 11.00 = 63.45, then modifiers -3 = 60.45

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.99 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.01 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Archetype core is almost always reachable on the opening hand
• Seven hand traps plus Reset give going-second interaction
• GY recursion through Release and Reverth
• Pendulum bosses with built-in destroy effects

Weaknesses

• No side deck
• Extra Deck carries no archetype cards in the export
• Pot of Sloth is off-archetype
• Pendulum scale and zone management raises pilot error risk
• No combo or meta data to verify conversion

Critical choke points

• Pendulum zone access: the engine needs two Enneacraft Pendulums in scale
• Enneapolis, a single copy, is the field spell the archetype depends on
• The Limited and Semi-Limited hand traps are one-of or two-of, so losing them removes the answer to the opponent's first summon

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Main 55, Extra 15, Side 0, legal in OCG with all Limited and Semi-Limited copies at their maximums; Archetype core group of 33 copies, probability 0.9924; Usage typical copies: Enneapolis 2, Enato 3, Enneacraft Reset 2
• Inferred: Engine accessibility from hypergeometric odds and searcher counts; Interaction density from card text; Ceiling and resilience read from text, not boards
• Provisional: Meta power and matchup fit, pending a dated metagame sample
• Data gaps: no combos supplied: combo floor, median, and ceiling are text-only inference no tournament link: archetype meta-share and pilot record are absent no win-rate telemetry for going-first, going-second, or matchups Meta Power is provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied no side deck, so post-side performance cannot be assessed