Enneacraft Deck #730482 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Enneacraft Control — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 52/100 (±6 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Control
• Secondary strategies: Stun, Burn
• Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 1 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Control lock via floodgates (Dimensional Fissure, Rivalry of Warlords) + negation (Jurrac Astero) + persistent board pressure; Burn damage via Enneapolis E.C. Counter recursion (900 per turn) + opponent resource depletion
• Turn 1 (going first): Normal Summon Level-1 Enneacraft searcher (Ekto/Proto/Deftero/Trito/Enato) → trigger Pendulum Effect → search core Enneacraft → Pendulum Summon high-Level bodies + Zaborg → Synchro into Jurrac Astero (trap setup) + Jurrac Meteor → establish Enneapolis field spell + backrow floodgates (Fissure/Rivalry)
• Turn 2 (going second): Discard Mulcharmy (Fuwalos/Purulia) to enable Quick Effect draws on opponent summons → generate hand advantage + resource replenishment → pivot to Zaborg/Meteor removal → establish Jurrac Astero negate + Enneapolis burn setup
• Recovery: Reverth (shuffle monsters to deck + draw) + Enneacraft Release (banish from GY to add Extra Deck face-up) + Jurrac Astero (banish 2 Dino from GY for repeatable summon negate) provide multi-turn grind
• After siding: No side deck supplied; main deck remains locked without best-of-3 adaptation tools

Why it scores here

The Enneacraft deck presents strong turn-1 consistency (~99.88% to open a core searcher) and multi-layered control interaction (negation via Jurrac Astero, floodgates via Dimensional Fissure and Rivalry of Warlords, burn via Enneapolis). However, the deck is **illegal to field in Master Duel** due to running 2 copies of Pot of Desires when only 1 is legal under the Limited banlist. If corrected, the theoretical Structural foundation (67/100) reflects reliable engine accessibility, decent interaction layering, and multi-turn grind potential, but is significantly hindered by modest offensive closing power (3000 ATK bosses, slow burn), complete absence of a side deck for best-of-3 adaptation, and zero supplied combo boards preventing precise ceiling/floor analysis. This evaluation is structural and theoretical only; the deck cannot be competitively ranked until the illegality is resolved.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: 85% Control + 15% Stun. Structural ≈ 67, Going First ≈ 74, Going Second ≈ 63, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 68. Modifiers: Illegality Penalty (-15); No Side Deck (-3); Zero Combo Data (-2). Final formula: 0.80·Structural(67) + 0.20·TournamentReliability(68) − Illegality_Penalty(15) = 52; Meta Provisional (no dated sample)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 1 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Extremely high turn-1 consistency (99.88% to open a searcher and establish board)
• Strong interaction layering (negation via Jurrac Astero, floodgates via Fissure/Rivalry, burn via Enneapolis)
• Excellent starter redundancy (5 distinct searcher variants at 2-3 copies each survive disruption)
• Multi-turn grind sustainability (Reverth, Release, Astero GY recursion enable long games)
• Compact main deck (19 distinct cards, 50% redundancy allows minimal filler)
• Synchro-heavy Extra Deck with strong coverage (Meteor boardwipe, Astero negate, Giganoto buff)

Weaknesses

• ILLEGAL in Master Duel (running 2x Pot of Desires, only 1 legal)
• No offensive closing power (3000 ATK bosses easily blocked; burn is slow at 900/turn)
• Limited hand-trap backup (only 2 hand-traps, 1-of each → ~28% in 6-card hand going-second)
• Zero side deck for best-of-3 adaptability
• Floodgate reliance (Fissure/Rivalry are permanent but removable; loss of them cripples board)
• Searcher LP cost (900 per activation; can constrain recovery if spammed)
• No combo boards supplied (ceiling/floor/median are text-inferred, not observed)

Critical choke points

• Pot of Desires illegality (2 copies vs. 1 allowed) — deck cannot be ranked competitively until corrected
• Enneapolis field spell removal = loss of burn wincon and E.C. Counter synergy
• Jurrac Astero negate is turnable (Synchro summon required; not instant) and consumes GY resources
• Pendulum Summon is the core combo seed — if blocked or negated, opening play is severely disrupted
• No side deck means no matchup-specific techs for best-of-3 (no Harpie removal, limited combo defense)
• Going-second hand-trap density is low (28% to open disruption) — vulnerable to combo decks

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality status: Illegal (Pot of Desires ×2 vs. ×1 legal in Master Duel Limited); Card text: All 34 distinct cards resolved and confirmed present; Deck size: 40 main + 15 extra + 0 side (within Master Duel format rules, but illegality overrides); Banlist status: Maxx "C" Semi-Limited (1 legal, 1 run), Dimension Shifter Limited (1 legal, 1 run), Pot of Desires Limited (1 legal, 2 run — VIOLATION), Rivalry Limited (1 legal, 1 run)
• Observed: Usage statistics: 70% core-cards present (14 of 20 core cards >50% inclusion); Enneacraft archetype established in deck community; Composition: 18 Pendulum Flip Effect, 10 Synchro Extra, 6 Mulcharmy, 3 Zaborg, 4 floodgate tech; Copy distribution: 8 cards at 3 copies, 5 at 2 copies, 6 at 1 copy (high redundancy)
• Inferred: Engine accessibility: P(≥1 Enneacraft core hand 5) ≈ 0.9988 via hypergeometric; very reliable starter access; Combo ceiling: Guide claims '1-card combo on turn 1' → extrapolated as Normal Summon + Pendulum Summon + 2 Synchro + backrow; no scored boards; Combo floor/median: Estimated as 1-2 Synchro + field spell per turn; reliant on text inference (no combo data); Interaction quality: Negation (Astero repeatable negate via GY) + floodgates (Fissure/Rivalry/Shifter) + burn (Enneapolis) = 3-layer system (inferred from card text); Going-second plan: Mulcharmy discards + Zaborg removal + Jurrac Astero negate + Enneapolis setup (inferred); Brick estimate: ~8-12% from Zaborg redundancy + Mulcharmy conditional + Fusion garnet; minor impact; Pilotability: '1-card combo' suggests accessible play; few decision points; GY tracking adds minor complexity
• Provisional: Meta Power: Archetype meta-share absent; no tournament record supplied; Enneacraft is niche/newer (provisional 58/100 based on anti-meta architecture alone); Matchup outcomes: No per-pilot match results; floodgate-heavy design targets generic weaknesses but lacks dated meta validation; Post-side performance: No side deck supplied; best-of-3 plan cannot be evaluated
• Data gaps: No combo boards or PowerIndex data supplied — combo ceiling/floor/median inferred from guide + card text only No tournament context — archetype meta-share, per-pilot match records, dated metagame sample all absent No side deck supplied — best-of-3 adaptability and post-side plan cannot be evaluated; D12 constrained to 45/100 No win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN (going-first/second win %, matchup breakdowns, brick/combo rates) — those signals remain Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is Provisional: archetype visibility is established but no dated metagame sample provided for calibration