Predaplant Deck #345417 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±5 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Midrange
• Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 45 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Fusion Summons of high-ATK DARK monsters (e.g., Triphyoverutum, Greedy Venom) supported by Predator Counter mechanics; Resource attrition and board control via continuous spells/traps and LP-cost extenso plays
• Turn 1 (going first): Search for core starters or fusion spells, establish Pendulum zones or place Predator Counters, and execute fusion summons to secure board presence
• Turn 2 (going second): Utilize board-clear spells (Raigeki, Harpie's Feather Duster) to remove threats, then pivot to fusion summons using field/hand materials to close
• Recovery: Banish Predaplanet from GY to resume fusion plays, or leverage GY effects of Byblisp/Sarraceniant to restart resource chains
• After siding: Inadequate due to 0 side cards; relies on existing main deck flex spells and trap cards for adaptation

Why it scores here

This Predaplant build operates as a fusion-centric combo system but suffers from significant structural inefficiencies. The high density of searchers provides reasonable engine accessibility, yet the 45-card main deck and absence of core staples like Droll & Lock Bird or Ambulomelides inflate brick rates and weaken both opening quality and going-second resilience. With zero side cards and minimal board-breaking tools, the deck struggles to adapt or challenge established boards. Consequently, the structural and tournament reliability scores remain low, yielding a contextual power rating in the low-30s range.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 43, Going First ≈ 45, Going Second ≈ 35, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 40. Modifiers: Zero side deck (-4); Main deck bloat (-4); Missing core staples (-4). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.53 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.45 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• High searcher density (~90% chance to draw a searcher)
• Versatile fusion material rules via Predaprime Fusion and Ultra Polymerization
• Strong boss monster ATK potential when successfully summoned

Weaknesses

• 45-card main deck inflates brick rate and dilutes consistency
• Zero side deck prevents post-match adaptation
• Missing nearly all standard hand traps and core fusion staples
• Weak going-second board-breaking capability

Critical choke points

• Failure to draw core starters or fusion spells leads to dead hands
• Lack of hand traps leaves the deck vulnerable to aggressive opens
• Heavy reliance on specific Pendulum/Fusion setups creates rigid turn orders

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality status confirmed; Main deck size 45, Extra 15, Side 0; Card text excerpts analyzed for roles
• Inferred: Engine consistency derived from 16 searcher copies (~90% draw); Brick risk estimated from 45-card main deck and low starter count; Combo floor/median inferred from available fusion texts due to missing combo logs; Board-breaking power assessed as low due to absence of standard disruption tools
• Provisional: Matchup format fit lacks dated metagame sample; Meta Power remains null
• Data gaps: no combos supplied — combo floor/median/ceiling is text-only inference no tournament link — archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent no win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN (going-first/second, matchup, game-level, brick/starter/OTK rates) — those signals are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied