Heroic Deck #775268 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 35/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Midrange, Toolbox
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 53 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 3 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Fusion Summon a large Destiny HERO or Contrast HERO Chaos body (Destro-Dogma, Dusktopia, Dystopia, Dominance) off Polymerization-family spells and Destiny HERO recursion; Elemental HERO and Masked HERO link and fusion pressure through Xtra HERO Dread Decimator and Favorite HERO Shining Flare Wingman
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a Fusion starter (Polymerization, Fusion Destiny, Super Polymerization, Dark City) plus a searcher, then fuse into a Destiny HERO boss while keeping Ash Blossom or Droll up
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold Ash Blossom, Ghost Ogre, Droll and Dominus to break the opponent's first Special Summon or search, then rebuild through GY-recursive Destiny HERO monsters
• Recovery: Recover through Destiny HERO monsters returned from the GY or banish zone by Denier or Doom Overlord, plus Masked HERO Dusk Crow and Mulcharmy draw effects
• After siding: No Side Deck is registered, so there is no post-side plan to evaluate

Why it scores here

The Heroic list reliably opens a Fusion engine: Polymerization-family spells, Fusion Destiny and Dark City at 3 copies each give a P(at least one in a 5-card opening hand) of roughly 0.26 per card, and the archetype core as a group reaches about 0.93 (Inferred). Interaction is dense (Ash Blossom, Ghost Ogre, Droll, Dominus Impulse, Typhoon, Dusk Crow), which supports the endboard and going-second scores. Closing power comes from the 2800 to 3400 ATK Destiny HERO fusions and Contrast HERO Chaos, scored on the system, not by averaging card scores. Popularity from the usage statistics confirms the list is a real archetype build but does not raise the score, and the deck is capped because three cards exceed their OCG copy limits, so this is a structural read only.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo profile, with Midrange as the secondary read on dimension weights. Structural ≈ 61, Going First ≈ 62, Going Second ≈ 58, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 52. Modifiers: Banlist exposure (-6); No side deck (-3). Final formula: No reliable metagame: 0.80*Structural(61) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(52) = 59; modifiers -9 gives 50; the Illegal legality cap then sets the final score to 35 (structural-only, not a normal Final Contextual score)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.93 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense fusion starter access with Destiny HERO recursion
• Strong closing bodies at 2800 to 3400 ATK
• Nine hand traps and multiple negate or removal effects for interaction

Weaknesses

• Three cards exceed the OCG copy limit, so the list is illegal as built
• No Side Deck
• High non-monster count and a 13-singleton spread reduce consistency

Critical choke points

• Polymerization-family starters and Fusion Destiny for the first fusion
• Dark City and Destiny HERO recursion for rebuilds after interaction

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality status Illegal with three copy-limit violations at OCG Semi-Limited; Main 53, Extra 15, Side 0 against OCG size rules; Card text and ATK values for the Destiny HERO fusions; Usage stats: 16 core cards, 12 present in this list
• Inferred: Starter probabilities from the hypergeometric draw table; Consistency, brick and interaction reads from card text; Ceiling and median from text only, since no combos were recorded
• Provisional: Meta Power (no dated metagame sample); Format fit and matchup coverage (no tournament data)
• Data gaps: No recorded combos: floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot record are absent No Side Deck, so D12 cannot be measured No win-rate telemetry, so going-first and going-second splits are inferred Meta Power is provisional without a dated metagame sample