Jinzo Deck #775249 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Stun
• Secondary strategies: Midrange, Toolbox
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 58 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 2 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Fusion and Extra Deck boss monsters (Red-Eyes Black Dragon Exceed, Predaplant Triphyoverutum, Hyperinvoked Aeon, Titaniklad) reached through Dark Time Wizard and Mulcharmy card advantage, with hand traps protecting the setup; Direct damage from high-ATK Extra Deck monsters after the opponent's board is cleared by Harpie's Feather Duster, Cosmic Cyclone and Droll-style locks
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a starter that draws or searches (Dark Time Wizard, Mulcharmy, Alligator's Dragon Knight, Fire Formation - Tenki) and convert it into a Fusion Summon via Super Polymerization; the deck has no verified two-card T1 line from the evidence
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold Ash Blossom, Droll & Lock Bird, Effect Veiler, Infinite Impermanence and Evenly Matched to answer the opponent's first summon and protect a single follow-up Fusion Summon
• Recovery: Mulcharmy draw effects and Dark Time Wizard recursion (Foolish Graverobber, Reversal Box) refill the hand after a disruption; the evidence gives no recorded boards to confirm this
• After siding: Not evaluable: the deck runs an empty Side Deck (0 cards)

Why it scores here

This list is Illegal in OCG: Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring and Super Polymerization are each run three times against a limit of two, so the deck is capped and its score is theoretical and structural only. The structural read comes from the system, not from averaging card scores: starter access is moderate (about 0.24 for a three-copy card in a five-card opening hand, Inferred) and the hand-trap and negation density (12 hand traps, 17 negation-text cards) gives real end-board interaction. Conversion is weak because no recorded boards exist, so floor and median output are text-only inference, and the 73 off-archetype copies (0% exact-name purity) and empty Side Deck pull efficiency and post-side adaptability down. Archetype popularity and usage stats confirm the list is a real build but add no power points, and the cap holds even though the structural score sits near 47.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Stun. Structural ≈ 46.5, Going First ≈ 42, Going Second ≈ 58, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 35. Modifiers: banlist_exposure (-10). Final formula: Illegal cap: 0.80*Structural(46.5) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(35) + Modifiers(-10) = 34.2, capped to 30; theoretical/structural-only (Meta provisional)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.24 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• 12 hand traps and 17 negation-text cards give layered interaction
• Extra Deck bosses have high ATK (Hyperinvoked Aeon 3800, Red-Eyes Exceed 3400)
• Mulcharmy and Dark Time Wizard provide card advantage

Weaknesses

• Illegal copy counts for Ash Blossom and Super Polymerization
• 0% exact-name archetype purity with 73 off-archetype copies
• No Side Deck
• No recorded combos to confirm a line

Critical choke points

• Starting a Fusion Summon depends on Super Polymerization, which is over the copy limit
• Dark Time Wizard lines depend on a single engine card category with many sub-archetypes

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Main 58, Extra 15, Side 0 counts within OCG size rules; Ash Blossom and Super Polymerization over copy limit (3 vs 2); Limited cards Droll & Lock Bird, Harpie's Feather Duster and Pot of Prosperity run at 1 copy each; Printed card stats and text
• Observed: Archetype usage stats show Ash Blossom, Droll & Lock Bird and Harpie's Feather Duster as core cards in the sample
• Inferred: Starter access and brick estimates from hypergeometric draws; Interaction quality from text role hints; Structural scores for D1 to D14
• Provisional: Meta Power and D13 matchup fit, since no dated metagame sample exists
• Data gaps: no combos supplied, so combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference no tournament link, so archetype meta-share and per-pilot record are absent no win-rate telemetry (going-first/second, matchup, brick/starter rates) Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied Deck title is null Side Deck is empty