Dogmatika Deck #774150 — Yu-Gi-Oh! TCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 37/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox
• Format: tcg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 3 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Dogmatika/Fallen of Albaz Fusion and Synchro lines into a 3000-ATK boss (Dragon that Devours the Dogma, Black Chaos, Black Luster Soldier, Secreterion Dragon) that the Extra Deck supports; Light and Darkness Ritual line (Light and Darkness Ritual + Magician of Dark Chaos / Black Chaos) as a second route to a 3000-ATK body
• Turn 1 (going first): Open on Dogmatika Ecclesia or Fallen of Albaz, search or special-summon a second engine piece, then Fusion or Synchro into a boss; the engine choice depends on which 5-card hand is drawn, so the T1 line is not fixed
• Turn 2 (going second): Use Ash Blossom, Ghost Ogre and Droll to break the opponent's board, then rebuild through Pot of Sloth or Nadir Servant into a Fusion or Synchro boss
• Recovery: Fallen of Albaz and Dogmatika Ecclesia are the recursion and reboot pieces; their GY and Deck access is the only resource loop the list clearly shows
• After siding: No side deck is registered (0 cards), so there is no post-side plan to evaluate

Why it scores here

This list is Illegal as submitted: three cards (Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring, The Fallen & The Virtuous, Super Polymerization) are run at 3 copies against a legal limit of 2, so it receives a structural-only score rather than a normal Final Contextual score. Its engine is split across several sub-archetypes (Light and Darkness Ritual about 12 main cards, Springans, Mulcharmy, Greed, Cyclone, Harpie), and only 2.9% of the archetype-named cards are exact Dogmatika, so the list reads more like a toolbox than one coherent engine. It opens a functional starter in a 5-card hand about 25% of the time for any 3-copy card, which keeps D1 and D2 low. Hand-trap density (8 cards, about 63% chance of at least one going second) and 17 removal-text cards carry the interaction score, while the missing archetype finishers (Ecclesia and the Dark Dragon, Mirrorjade, Titaniklad) lower the closing and conversion read. The score is built from the system dimensions, not from averaging the card scores, and popularity of the Dogmatika archetype did not add points.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 48, Going First ≈ 48, Going Second ≈ 46, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 36. Modifiers: Banlist exposure (-4); Engine conflicts (-3); No side deck (-2). Final formula: Theoretical structural-only (Illegal list): 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers = 0.80*48 + 0.20*36 - 9 = 36.6, rounded to 37 (Meta provisional)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.25 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Eight hand traps and three negation-text cards give layered interaction
• Fusion and Synchro boss options reach 3000 ATK
• Pot of Sloth and Super Polymerization add card flow

Weaknesses

• Illegal copy counts on three cards
• Multiple competing engines dilute consistency
• Missing core Extra Deck finishers (Ecclesia and the Dark Dragon, Mirrorjade, Titaniklad)
• No side deck

Critical choke points

• Fallen of Albaz and Dogmatika Ecclesia are the only shared Dogmatika engine pieces; losing them to interaction removes most of the line
• Each boss needs a specific Fusion or Synchro partner from the same Extra Deck slot

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality: three cards over the TCG copy limit; main 55, extra 15, side 0; Card text and stats for all 55 main and 15 Extra Deck cards; Usage statistics: Dogmatika core present 12 of 25
• Inferred: Opening-hand consistency for starters and hand traps (hypergeometric, Main Deck only); Interaction density and resilience read from card text; Going-first and going-second plans
• Provisional: Meta Power (no dated metagame sample); Matchup fit and tournament reliability (no tournament link)
• Data gaps: Illegal copy counts make the list a structural-only read, not a normal score No combos supplied, so floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent No win-rate telemetry for this deck; brick, starter and interaction rates are Inferred No side deck registered Usage-stat in_this_deck flags disagree with the card list for several Extra Deck cards (Ecclesia and the Dark Dragon, Mirrorjade, Titaniklad, Rindbrumm, Granguignol, Dragon that Devours): they show in_this_deck false yet appear in cards[] with zone extra, so core-coverage figures may be unreliable Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied