Enneacraft Deck #773882 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 54/100 (±7 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Stun
• Secondary strategies: Control, Pendulum
• Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 0 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Pendulum-zone Enneacraft boss monsters (3000 ATK) and E.C. counter burn from Enneapolis; Direct damage from Enneapolis E.C. counters (900 per counter) once the field is controlled
• Turn 1 (going first): Set up Enneapolis and Pendulum Zone monsters while using negation and removal text to keep the opponent's first board from taking hold
• Turn 2 (going second): Use Maxx C as the single hand trap, then rely on the Pendulum removal effects and negations to answer the opponent's board and set up a 3000 ATK boss
• Recovery: Searchers (16 text hits) and GY-activated recursion (Enneacraft Reset, Reverth, Release) rebuild a line after an interruption
• After siding: None: the deck runs no Side Deck, so there is no post-side plan in the evidence

Why it scores here

The deck reliably opens its engine through search rather than through any single card: 16 searcher-text cards give roughly a 0.94 chance of at least one searcher in a 5-card opening hand, while each individual 3-copy starter such as Enneapolis is only about 0.34 (Inferred). Its strongest dimension is end-board interaction, with 12 negation-text and 25 removal-text cards plus Pendulum effects that destroy or reposition monsters, and it keeps a usable follow-up through Graveyard recursion from Enneacraft Reset, Reverth and Release. Offensive closing is real but depends on converting the board, with 3000 ATK bosses and burn from E.C. counters, while the lack of recorded boards keeps the combo ceiling and median provisional. The score is held down by an empty Extra Deck, which leaves two Enneacraft spells without their Extra Deck target, by the absence of a Side Deck, and by a fragile going-second hand with one hand trap. Popularity and meta share earned no points here, and card scores were not averaged into the deck result.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Stun primary, Control secondary; D13 excluded because it is Provisional. Structural ≈ 58, Going First ≈ 62, Going Second ≈ 60, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 52. Modifiers: engine compactness (2); no side deck (-3); empty Extra Deck with Extra-dependent spells (-2). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers (Meta provisional; Structural 58.5 renormalized over 86 weight points, rounded to 58; 0.80*58 + 0.20*52 = 56.8, then -3 modifiers)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.34 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Searcher density (16 text hits) makes at least one search in the opening hand very likely
• Dense interaction: 12 negation-text and 25 removal-text cards, with Pendulum effects that destroy or reposition monsters
• Graveyard recursion (Enneacraft Reset, Reverth, Release) gives a recovery route after disruption
• Compact main deck: 40 cards, 18 distinct, 85% exact-name archetype purity

Weaknesses

• Empty Extra Deck, so the Extra-Deck targets of Enneacraft Release and Reverth are unavailable
• No Side Deck, so no post-side adaptation
• Single hand trap (Maxx C) gives little going-second interaction
• 3-copy starters are individually unlikely in a 5-card hand (about 0.34 each)

Critical choke points

• Enneapolis: the Field Spell that carries the E.C. counter and burn engine; only 3 copies, so its absence in hand5 is about a 66% chance
• The Pendulum Zone: Pendulum monsters need the zone to be set up before the Pendulum effects can be used

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legal in Master Duel: 40 main, 0 extra, 0 side; Maxx C is Limited at 1 copy and is run at 1 copy; Composition: 25 Pendulum monsters, 13 spells, 2 effect monsters; 18 distinct cards; Card text: 16 searcher-text cards, 12 negation-text cards, 25 removal-text cards
• Observed: Usage statistics: 16 of 21 core archetype cards are present (76.2%)
• Inferred: Primary strategy Stun, from the negation and removal density plus the guide's lock-based description; Hypergeometric estimates: about 0.34 per 3-copy starter in hand5, 0.94 for at least one searcher; Recursion-based recovery from Graveyard activations in the card text
• Provisional: Meta Power is null: there is no dated metagame sample; Matchup fit (D13) is excluded from the structural score; Going-second power and post-side plan are not validated by any performance data
• Data gaps: No recorded combos: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta share and pilot match record are absent No win-rate telemetry for going-first, going-second, matchups, or brick and starter rates Pendulum scale is exported as 0 for every card, so the scale data cannot be used Only one Vietnamese guide, with a single snippet and no section structure Meta Power is Provisional without a dated metagame sample