Artmage Deck #773858 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel
60 Main, 15 Extra, incl. K9-04 Noroi x3, K9-17 Izuna x3, Mulcharmy Fuwalos x3. Created Oct 25, 2026 by YGO Mod.
Created by: YGO Mod (20517634)
Created On: 10/25/2026
Main Deck (60)
- Artmage Finmel x2
- Artmage Graflare x2
- Artmage Litera x2
- Artmage Power Patron x2
- K9-04 Noroi x3
- K9-17 Izuna x3
- K9-66a Jokul x2
- K9-66b Lantern x1
- K9-ØØ Lupis x1
- Maxx "C" x1
- Medius the Pure x2
- Mulcharmy Fuwalos x3
- Mulcharmy Purulia x3
- Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring x3
- "A Case for K9" x1
- Artmage Academic Arcane Arts Acropolis x3
- Artmage Vandalism -Assault- x2
- Artmage Varnish -Alteration- x3
- Crossout Designator x1
- Harpie's Feather Duster x1
- Illusion Gate x1
- K9-X Forced Release x1
- Pot of Sloth x3
- Reincarnation Unveiling Mail x1
- Triple Tactics Talent x3
- Triple Tactics Thrust x3
- Artmage Impasto -Recapture- x1
- Artmage Pact -Awakening- x1
- Evenly Matched x3
- Full-Armored Xyz x1
- The Black Goat Laughs x1
Extra Deck (15)
- Artmage Diactorus x1
- Artmage Non-Finito x2
- Nerva the Power Patron of Creation x1
- S:P Little Knight x1
- CXyz N.As.Ch. Knight x1
- Full Armored Dark Knight Lancer x1
- K9-17 "Ripper" x1
- K9-66X "Jacks" x1
- K9-X "Werewolf" x1
- N.As.H. Knight x1
- Number 104: Masquerade x1
- Number C104: Umbral Horror Masquerade x1
- Super Starslayer TY-PHON - Sky Crisis x1
- Xyz Armor Fortress x1
Couldn't load the deck
Deck — Deck Power Evaluation
Final Contextual Deck Power: 54/100 (±6 · Confidence: Medium)
| Overall score | Value |
|---|---|
| Structural Deck Power | 61 |
| Going First | 62 |
| Going Second | 63 |
| Meta Power | provisional |
| Tournament Reliability | 52 |
- Primary strategy: Midrange
- Secondary strategies: Toolbox, Fusion/Xyz
- Format: master-duel
Legality
Main 60 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.
Identity & game plan
- Win condition: Xyz and Fusion boards from Artmage starters (Artmage Non-Finito, Nerva, Diactorus) and K9 Xyz (K9-66X Jacks, K9-X Werewolf, K9-17 Ripper) that convert pressure after the first interaction exchange; Mulcharmy draw-and-attack pressure and K9 Normal Summons on a hand-advantage opponent, with Pot of Sloth as card advantage
- Turn 1 (going first): Artmage Varnish or Acropolis to reach Artmage Power Patron or Medius, then a Fusion or Xyz board, protected by Ash Blossom and Evenly Matched
- Turn 2 (going second): Hand traps (Ash Blossom, Evenly Matched, Maxx C) on the opponent's first summon or search, then a K9 Normal Summon if the opponent holds 2 or more cards
- Recovery: Artmage Litera and Finmel recursion from the GY, Mulcharmy draws, and Pot of Sloth to refill the hand; Artmage Graflare Sets an Artmage Spell from the Deck
- After siding: No side deck is registered, so there is no post-side plan; the deck cannot adapt between games in a best-of-3
Why it scores here
The deck opens a functional plan reasonably often: the 22-card archetype core has about a 0.91 chance of at least one copy in a 5-card opening hand (Inferred, hypergeometric), and 21 searcher-text cards give about 0.89. Conversion is credible but untested: Fusion and Xyz routes exist through Artmage Power Patron and K9 Xyz, but no recorded boards exist, so the ceiling and median are text-only inferences. Interaction is the deck's strongest feature: seven hand traps, several negation and removal cards, and a dense end-board of Xyz removal support its survival through the opponent's turn, and it is compact enough to keep recovering. The score does not come from popularity, since the 28% exact-name purity and the three-archetype mix are scored as a weakness, and it does not come from averaging card scores; it reflects the system: a three-archetype toolbox with reasonable consistency, real interaction, and no side deck or post-side plan.
Dimension scores
| # | Dimension | Score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Engine Accessibility & Consistency | 66 | P(>=1 core card in 5) ~0.91 over 22 core copies; Varnish and Acropolis each at 0.23 per 3-copy card; engine needs two Artmage cards to be live (Inferred) |
| D2 | Opening-Hand Quality & Brick Management | 66 | Brick proxy ~0.09 for hand-5 with no core card; 21 searchers give ~0.89 access; 7 hand traps at 0.54 going-second add dead-card risk in hand (Inferred) |
| D3 | Combo Conversion & Ceiling | 58 | No parseable recorded boards; best Fusion and Xyz routes inferred from text (Artmage Non-Finito, Nerva, K9-66X Jacks, K9-X Werewolf) (Inferred) |
| D4 | Combo Floor & Median Output | 50 | No combo data; the floor cannot be measured, and dilution across three archetypes at 28% exact-name purity is assumed to lower the median (Provisional) |
| D5 | Interruption Resilience & Route Redundancy | 64 | Ash, Evenly Matched, Maxx C, Varnish, Vandalism and Acropolis give several independent answers; a secondary K9 and Mulcharmy route survives one disruption (Inferred) |
| D6 | Resource Economy, Recovery & Grind | 66 | Pot of Sloth, Mulcharmy draws and Litera/Finmel GY recursion are real card-economy sources; no net card-advantage measurement exists (Inferred) |
| D7 | End-Board & Interaction Quality | 72 | Ash, Evenly Matched, Impasto, Crossout Designator, Feather Duster and Illusion Gate form layered interaction; no board-state measurement (Inferred semantic) |
| D8 | Going-Second & Board-Breaking Power | 68 | Going-second split is absent; hand traps and Feather Duster plus Crossout give board-breaking reach (Inferred) |
| D9 | Offensive Pressure & Closing Power | 70 | K9-X Werewolf (3300 ATK), Nerva (3300), Diactorus (2800) and K9-66X Jacks (2600) give strong end-board ATK; no closing data (Verified stats, Inferred closing) |
| D10 | Main Deck Efficiency & Flexibility | 58 | 60 main with 31 distinct cards and 3-copy staples on a 28%-pure archetype base; Pot of Sloth and Maxx C are generic dilution (Inferred) |
| D11 | Extra Deck Efficiency & Coverage | 60 | 15 extra with 14 distinct cards: 4 Fusion, 10 Xyz, 1 Link; a single Nerva and a single Diactorus do not form a dependable Extra Deck; mandatory Fusion enablers are unclear (Inferred) |
| D12 | Side Deck Adaptability | 25 | No side deck is registered (side count 0), so there is no measured post-side adaptability (Verified count, Provisional quality) |
| D13 | Matchup Coverage & Format Fit | 50 | No tournament link and no dated meta sample; archetype usage alone does not establish format fit (Provisional) |
| D14 | Pilotability & Error Tolerance | 40 | Many decision points across three archetypes, Fusion timing, Xyz material choice, and hand-trap choice; combo complexity unmeasured (Inferred) |
How the score was computed
Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 61, Going First ≈ 62, Going Second ≈ 63, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 52. Modifiers: No side deck (-2); Archetype dilution (-2); Engine conflicts (-1). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers (Meta provisional, no dated sample): 0.80*61.2 + 0.20*52 - 5 = 54.4
Couldn't load the combos
