Blue-Eyes Deck #773793 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 34/100 (±6 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Toolbox
• Secondary strategies: FTK/Alternate-Win
• Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 41 / Extra 0 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Blue-Eyes White Dragon beatdown: 3 copies at 3000 ATK, reached through Double Summon and draw spells. Original Bamboo Sword direct-attack destruction is a secondary closer.; Exodia five-piece hand (five single-copy Limited cards). An alternate win with a near-zero opening-hand probability.
• Turn 1 (going first): Turn 1: draw spells (Shard of Greed, Upstart Goblin, Trade-In, Chicken Game, Golden Bamboo Sword) dig for a Blue-Eyes White Dragon. Double Summon lets the player add a second Normal Summon.
• Turn 2 (going second): No hand traps and no floodgates. The deck contests the board only through draw density and a late Blue-Eyes Dragon. Force-interaction is weak.
• Recovery: Dark Factory of Mass Production returns 2 Normal Monsters (Exodia pieces or Blue-Eyes) from the GY. The White Stone of Legend adds a Blue-Eyes from the Deck when it is sent to the GY.
• After siding: No side deck (0 cards), so there is no post-side plan.

Why it scores here

The deck reliably opens draw spells: 20 draw-engine copies (Shard of Greed, Upstart Goblin, Trade-In, Chicken Game, Royal Magical Library, Golden Bamboo Sword, Cards of Consonance) give card flow whatever the opening hand contains. It does not reliably open a Blue-Eyes engine: P(at least one Blue-Eyes White Dragon in a 5-card opening) is about 0.33, and the deck has no Maiden of White, Sage with Eyes of Blue, or Extra Deck Blue-Eyes threat. Interaction is nearly absent (no hand traps, no floodgates, one negation-text card at 2 copies), so the deck scores low on going-second board breaking and end-board quality. The Exodia five-piece route is a real alternate win but it is single-copy and has a near-zero opening probability, so it does not raise the consistency score. Popularity and archetype naming earned no points, and card scores were not averaged.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Toolbox. Structural ≈ 39, Going First ≈ 43, Going Second ≈ 33, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 40. Modifiers: engine conflicts (-3); unrecoverable choke point (-2). Final formula: No reliable metagame: Final = 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers. Structural is meta-neutral: the Toolbox profile with D13 (weight 5) dropped and weights re-normalized over 95. 0.80*39.1 + 0.20*40 - 5 = 34.3 -> 34.

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.33 · key two-card combo ≈ 0 · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense card flow: 20 draw-engine copies give consistent draws regardless of the opening hand
• Compact list: 21 distinct cards, legal 41-card main with no over-limit copies
• Dark Factory and Magical Stone Excavation provide recursion for Exodia pieces and Spells
• Three 3000-ATK Blue-Eyes White Dragons provide a closing threat

Weaknesses

• No Blue-Eyes engine: no Maiden of White, Sage with Eyes of Blue, or Extra Deck Blue-Eyes; none of the top-25 usage-core cards are present
• Zero Extra Deck cards and zero side-deck cards
• Near-absent interaction: no hand traps, no floodgates, one negation-text card
• Exodia five-piece hand is single-copy and has a near-zero opening probability

Critical choke points

• Three Blue-Eyes White Dragons are the only Level 8 monsters, so Trade-In and tribute lines fail without them
• Exodia needs all five single-copy Limited pieces in hand, which is not recoverable on most boards
• Spell Power Attainment needs Spell Counters from Royal Magical Library

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legal in master-duel: 41 main cards within 40-60; all six restricted cards at 1 copy within Limited status; Composition: 21 distinct cards, 36 of 41 copies off the exact Blue-Eyes name, 0 Extra and 0 Side; 0 of 25 usage-core cards present in this deck
• Inferred: Opening probabilities for Blue-Eyes White Dragon and Exodia pieces (hypergeometric); Draw-engine density supports consistent card flow; Interaction is near-absent and going-second board breaking is weak
• Provisional: Meta Power and matchup fit: no dated metagame sample or tournament link
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median, and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent No win-rate telemetry: going-first/second, matchup, and brick rates are Inferred Meta Power is Provisional: no dated metagame sample supplied Exodia the Obliterator effect text is truncated in the excerpt; its full text was not used