Enneacraft Deck #773593 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 58/100 (±7 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Control
• Secondary strategies: Stun, Midrange
• Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 0 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Burn damage from Enneapolis E.C. Counters (900 per counter) backed by 3000-ATK Enneacraft Pendulum bosses that destroy lower-ATK monsters; Board control through Pendulum-zone destroy effects and negation, with the Enneacraft boss monsters as closers
• Turn 1 (going first): Set Enneapolis, place Enneacraft Pendulum monsters in the Pendulum Zones, search with the 100-ATK Pendulum searchers (900 LP each), then set up Pendulum-zone destruction on the first turn
• Turn 2 (going second): Use Maxx C draw and negation effects from hand and Graveyard to slow the opponent, then convert to a 3000-ATK boss while keeping Enneapolis for E.C. Counter burn
• Recovery: Enneacraft Reverth, Release and Reset recover from the Graveyard, along with Pendulum searchers that re-add cards after the first turn
• After siding: No side deck is registered, so there is no post-side plan to evaluate

Why it scores here

The score comes from how the 40-card system behaves as a whole, not from averaging individual cards. The deck is 85% exact Enneacraft by name, and its 16 searcher-text cards give roughly a 94% chance of at least one searcher in a 5-card opening hand, which gives it a reliable way to find its engine (Inferred). Its interaction is the strongest part: 12 negation-text and 25 removal-text cards, plus the Pendulum-zone destroy effects on five 3000-ATK bosses, cover the end board well (Inferred from text). The deck has no recorded boards, so its combo ceiling and median output are text-based estimates and are scored conservatively. Popularity and archetype usage confirm the list is real and accessible, but they earned no points toward power; the deck is penalized for having no Extra Deck, no side deck, and Extra-Deck-dependent text that cannot be used.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Control. Structural ≈ 60.65, Going First ≈ 68, Going Second ≈ 66, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 55. Modifiers: Engine compactness (2); Extra Deck text without Extra Deck cards (-2); No side deck (-2). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers (Meta provisional, no dated metagame sample)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.94 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Compact, single-archetype engine with 85% exact-name purity
• Dense interaction: 12 negation-text and 25 removal-text cards
• Multiple searchers (16) give a high chance of finding the engine
• Recovery through Graveyard effects (Reverth, Release, Reset)

Weaknesses

• No Extra Deck and no side deck, so no post-side plan and dead Extra-Deck text
• No recorded boards, so the combo ceiling and median cannot be measured
• Pendulum scale values are missing from the evidence, so Pendulum-zone math is unverified
• Heavy reliance on Pendulum-zone state, which raises pilot error risk

Critical choke points

• Enneapolis as the field engine enabler: if the opponent destroys or negates it early, E.C. Counter burn is lost
• Pendulum zone setup: without two Enneacraft Pendulum cards, the destroy effects do not turn on

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legal in Master Duel: 40 main cards, 0 Extra, 0 Side, no violations; Maxx C is Limited with 1 copy run, which is legal; Card text for the Enneacraft engine, Enneapolis E.C. Counter burn, and Pendulum searches; Usage stats: the Enneacraft core is at 100% inclusion for Proto, Ekto, Alazone, Atori and Maxx C
• Inferred: Opening-hand consistency from the hypergeometric estimates; Interaction quality from negation and removal text roles; Going-first and going-second plans from card text; Recovery plan from Graveyard text
• Provisional: Meta Power (null) and matchup fit (D13 = 50) without a dated metagame sample
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent No win-rate telemetry: going-first/second, matchup, brick and OTK rates are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied Pendulum scale values are 0 across all Pendulum monsters in the evidence, so Pendulum-zone math is unverified No side deck is registered, so post-side behavior cannot be assessed Guide is a single Vietnamese snippet with no sections