Azamina Deck #773268 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 28/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Toolbox
• Secondary strategies: Midrange, Combo
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 45 / Extra 18 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 1 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Unverified: a Regenesis or Fiendsmith board that reaches 2500-ATK monsters, with Azamina and Draglubion as Extra Deck closers. No recorded boards support it.; Red-Eyes Black Fullmetal Dragon (3400 ATK) or Metalzoa X (3000 ATK) through Max Metalmorph, if the Metalmorph line resolves.
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a Regenesis or Mulcharmy starter, search with Regenesis or Regenesis Archfiend, and keep Ash Blossom or Infinite Impermanence up. Only the first two steps are textually clear; the rest is Inferred.
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold Ash Blossom, Maxx C, and Infinite Impermanence to answer the opponent's first summon, then rebuild through Regenesis searchers. The hand-trap density is the main reason this plan exists.
• Recovery: Regenesis Archfiend and Regenesis Dragon recover from the GY or hand by revealing a 2500-ATK or DEF monster; Regenesis Code and Regenesis Birth replay them. This is Inferred from card text only.
• After siding: Not evaluable: the deck has no Side Deck, so no post-side plan exists.

Why it scores here

This deck is Illegal in OCG because its Extra Deck holds 18 cards against a maximum of 15, so it receives a capped theoretical score rather than a normal contextual one. Its engines (Regenesis, Fiendsmith, Mulcharmy, Metalmorph, Red-Eyes, Code Talker, Orcust) are mostly unrelated, and only 2 of 45 Main Deck cards and 3 of 10 usage-core cards carry the Azamina name, so the Azamina theme does not hold the list together. Starter access is moderate: the 0.64 archetype-core hand probability and 0.90 searcher-text group probability are hypergeometric estimates, and the Regenesis-only starter odds (about 0.30 per triple-copy card in a 5-card hand) are weaker. Interaction is the strongest area, with 5 hand traps, 10 negation-text cards and 15 removal-text cards, and the going-second hand-trap probability is 0.53. There are no recorded combos, no guides and no tournament link, so the floor and median are text-only inference. The score does not come from averaging card scores or from the archetype's popularity; the deck is structurally scored as a Toolbox-style system and then capped for legality.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Toolbox. Structural ≈ 44, Going First ≈ 40, Going Second ≈ 46, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 30. Modifiers: Illegal Extra Deck size (-10); Engine conflicts (-3). Final formula: Illegal cap: 0.80*Structural(44) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(30) = 41.2, then modifiers -10 and -3 = 28 (Meta provisional; theoretical structural only)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.64 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Broad interaction: 5 hand traps, 10 negation-text and 15 removal-text cards
• 16 searcher-text cards give several restart routes after disruption
• High-impact closers in the Extra Deck (Azamina, Draglubion, Red-Eyes Black Fullmetal)

Weaknesses

• Illegal: Extra Deck of 18 exceeds the OCG maximum of 15
• Mixed engines with low archetype purity (3.2%) and conflicting conditions
• No Side Deck
• Only 3 of 10 usage-core cards present

Critical choke points

• Regenesis Lord, Regenesis Sage and Regenesis Archfiend start most of the high-ATK lines; each is one or two copies
• Any single answer to Max Metalmorph or the Regenesis monsters shuts down several engines at once

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Extra Deck 18 exceeds OCG maximum 15 (Illegal); All restricted cards are within legal copy limits; Exact-name Azamina purity 3.2%; 3 of 10 usage-core cards present; Side Deck is empty; Printed ATK/DEF values of the closers
• Inferred: Hypergeometric starter, hand-trap and archetype-core probabilities; Interaction density from text hints; Going-first and going-second plans from card text; Brick risk from single-copy count
• Provisional: Meta and format fit (no dated sample or tournament link)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied; combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link; archetype meta-share and per-pilot records are absent No win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN for going-first, going-second, matchups or brick rates Meta Power is Provisional without a dated metagame sample No Side Deck, so post-side performance cannot be assessed No guides attached to the archetype Deck title is null