Enneacraft Deck #773191 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 59/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Control, Toolbox
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 0 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Pendulum-engine board of Level 9 3000-ATK Enneacraft monsters, backed by Enneapolis E.C. counters that deal damage at End Phase; Recursion-driven grind: Enneacraft Release and Enneacraft Reset return from the GY to rebuild the Pendulum Zones
• Turn 1 (going first): Open with a searcher-capable Pendulum monster, place an Enneacraft Pendulum in the Pendulum Zone, and chain the Pendulum effects into a Level 9 boss while holding Solemn Judgment or Droll & Lock Bird for the opponent's first answer
• Turn 2 (going second): Use the six-card hand's hand traps (Droll & Lock Bird, Solemn Scolding, Evenly Matched) and the Limited Solemn Judgment to slow the opponent's opening, then rebuild through the Pendulum searchers
• Recovery: Banish or recast Enneacraft Release and Enneacraft Reverth from the GY to redo the search and summon chain, and use Enneapolis to keep the E.C. Counter pressure running
• After siding: No side deck is registered, so the post-side plan is unverified; the deck relies on the main deck alone

Why it scores here

The deck's score comes from the system: a 35-copy Enneacraft core that is almost always live in the opening hand (about 99.5 percent at least one in 5 cards, Inferred), several searchers and recursion routes that keep the engine going after disruption, and a dense interaction suite of removal, negation and hand traps. The Level 9 Pendulum monsters give it a late-game closing threat, but the score is held down by the absence of any recorded boards, no side deck, and an empty Extra Deck that leaves the GY recursion effects of Enneacraft Release and Enneacraft Reset without a target. Popularity did not earn points: the Enneacraft core inclusion stats confirm the list is standard, not that it is strong. Card scores were not averaged, and no meta or win-rate data was available, so Meta Power is null.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange primary; Control used only as the secondary label, not as a weight blend. Structural ≈ 62, Going First ≈ 60, Going Second ≈ 58, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 58. Modifiers: Unverified Pendulum scale data (-2). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional) + ContextModifiers; 0.80*62.3 + 0.20*58 - 2 = 59.4, rounded to 59

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 1 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Core archetype cards (13 of 13 high-inclusion cards present) with near-certain opening access
• Searcher and recursion density gives repeat access to the engine after disruption
• Layered interaction: removal, negation, hand traps and Solemn-family traps
• Compact 55-card, 23-distinct-card build with no dead slots in the Main Deck list

Weaknesses

• No Extra Deck, so GY recursion targets for Enneacraft Release and Enneacraft Reset are absent
• No side deck, leaving best-of-3 adaptation unverified
• Pendulum scale and Extra Deck placement unverified (scale fields all 0)
• Limited to one copy each of Droll & Lock Bird and Solemn Judgment, so the strongest hand traps are single-copy

Critical choke points

• The single Limited Solemn Judgment and Droll & Lock Bird are one-of answers to the opponent's first play
• Enneapolis is the only persistent field presence; if it is removed the E.C. Counter damage stops

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality: Legal under OCG BanList; Droll & Lock Bird and Solemn Judgment are each 1 copy at Limited; Composition: 55 main, 0 extra, 0 side, Enneacraft exact-name purity 65.5 percent; Usage stats: all 13 high-inclusion core cards present
• Inferred: Opening access to the archetype core is about 99.5 percent in a 5-card hand; Interaction density is high based on text roles across 38 removal and 16 negation copies; Recursion and searcher density supports interruption resilience
• Provisional: Median output and ceiling, since no combos are recorded; Matchup and format fit, since no tournament or dated meta sample exists; Post-side adaptability, since no side deck is registered
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent No side deck registered: post-side adaptability cannot be scored Pendulum scale fields are 0 for every Pendulum monster, so Pendulum Summon access is unverified No win-rate telemetry exists; brick, starter and matchup signals are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied