Diabellstar Deck #772556 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Toolbox
• Secondary strategies: Stun, Midrange
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 58 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 8 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Fire King and Mulcharmy-driven boards converting into High Avatar / Garunix and Link beaters (Diabellstar core is absent apart from a single Diabellstar the Black Witch); Azamina and Sinful Spoils value and Link/Xyz beaters; the Forbidden Azamina Ilia Silvia cannot be run as built
• Turn 1 (going first): Open on a Mulcharmy or Fire King starter, use Droll and Ash Blossom to protect the first engine, then pivot into a Link or Xyz board. Starter access is weak, so this plan depends on a lucky opening (Inferred)
• Turn 2 (going second): Use the hand-trap suite (14 hand-trap-tagged cards, about 83% chance of at least one in a six-card hand, Inferred) to stop the opponent's first Summon, then follow up with a Link or Xyz board
• Recovery: Recursion through Fire King and Snake-Eye GY effects and Mulcharmy draw effects; the draw engines are conditional on having no cards in the field
• After siding: Not evaluable: the deck runs no side deck (0 of 15 slots), so no post-side plan exists

Why it scores here

The deck is not legal as built: it runs four Forbidden cards and six cards over their copy limits, so this is a theoretical, structural-only read. Its 58 main-deck cards spread across roughly 37 distinct names, and only 1.4% of its cards share the Diabellstar name, with the rest split across Fire King, Mulcharmy, Sinful Spoils, Snake-Eye and other sub-archetypes. That makes it a toolbox list whose engines are only loosely connected, and its 14 hand-trap and 17 searcher-text cards provide interaction and smoothing rather than a single coherent plan. The strongest signal is the going-second hand-trap density, which is an Inferred estimate from hypergeometric odds only, not observed results. Popularity was not a factor, since no archetype share or tournament link is present, and the score was not built by averaging card scores.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Toolbox. Structural ≈ 42, Going First ≈ 36, Going Second ≈ 40, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 40. Modifiers: Banlist exposure (-8); Engine conflicts (-4). Final formula: No reliable metagame: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers = 0.80*42 + 0.20*40 - 12 ≈ 30; Illegal deck, so this is a theoretical, structural-only score

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.73 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.27 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Hand-trap density (14 cards) gives strong going-second interaction
• Broad removal and negation text across the main deck
• Multiple Link and Xyz beaters in the Extra Deck

Weaknesses

• Illegal as built: 4 Forbidden cards and 6 copies over their limits
• Weak archetype coherence: 1.4% exact-name purity, with the engine spread over several sub-archetypes
• No side deck, so no post-side plan
• Bloated main deck with 24 single-copy cards and many off-archetype slots

Critical choke points

• Starter access depends on Mulcharmy or Fire King cards, with about 27% proxy brick risk
• Forbidden Azamina Ilia Silvia is the Extra Deck link into the Azamina line, so that line is not playable as built

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legal status Illegal: 4 Forbidden cards and 6 copies over limit; Main 58, Extra 15, Side 0 against the OCG size rules; Archetype purity 1.4% with a spread across Fire King, Mulcharmy, Sinful Spoils and others; 14 hand-trap tagged cards, 17 searcher-text cards, 24 removal-text cards
• Inferred: Starter access ≈ 0.73 and brick proxy ≈ 0.27 from hypergeometric estimates; Going-second hand-trap availability ≈ 0.83; Interaction quality and recovery plans from card text
• Provisional: Meta Power and format fit: no dated metagame sample or tournament link
• Data gaps: No combos supplied, so combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link, so archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record are absent No win-rate telemetry; going-first and going-second splits are Inferred Meta Power is Provisional because no dated metagame sample is supplied No side deck supplied, so post-side adaptability cannot be measured