Snake-Eyes Deck #772521 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG
43 Main, 14 Extra, incl. Silvy of the White Forest x3, Astellar of the White Forest x2, Diabellstar the Black Witch x2. Created Oct 21, 2026 by YGO Mod.
Created by: YGO Mod (20517634)
Created On: 10/21/2026
Main Deck (43)
- Astellar of the White Forest x2
- Diabellstar the Black Witch x2
- Diabellstar Vengeance x1
- Diabellze the Original Sinkeeper x1
- Elzette of the White Forest x2
- Elzette, Azamina of the White Forest x2
- Mulcharmy Purulia x1
- Queen Azamina x1
- Snake-Eye Ash x2
- Snake-Eye Oak x1
- Snake-Eyes Diabellstar x2
- Snake-Eyes Flamberge Dragon x1
- Snake-Eyes Poplar x1
- Vouiburial, the Dragon Undertaker x1
- Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring x2
- Rucia of the White Forest x1
- Silvy of the White Forest x3
- Bonfire x1
- Divine Temple of the Snake-Eye x1
- Dramatic Snake-Eye Chase x1
- One for One x1
- Scourge of the White Forest x1
- Sinful Spoils of Subversion - Snake-Eye x1
- Susurrus of the Sinful Spoils x1
- Tales of the White Forest x2
- The Hallowed Azamina x1
- WANTED: Seeker of Sinful Spoils x2
- Infinite Impermanence x2
- Sinful Spoils of Betrayal - Silvera x1
- Sinful Spoils Sanctification x1
- Woes of the White Forest x1
Extra Deck (14)
- Azamina x1
- Azamina Moa Regina x1
- Saint Azamina x1
- Snake-Eyes Doomed Dragon x2
- Hiita the Fire Charmer, Ablaze x1
- I:P Masquerena x1
- Relinquished Anima x1
- S:P Little Knight x1
- Chaos Angel x1
- Diabell, Queen of the White Forest x1
- Rciela, Sinister Soul of the White Forest x1
- Silvera, Wolf Tamer of the White Forest x1
- Heretical Phobos Covos x1
error
Couldn't load the deck
35± 10/ 100
Power Score
Structural
49
Reliability
40
Going First
45
Going Second
42
Deck — Deck Power Evaluation
Final Contextual Deck Power: 35/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)
| Overall score | Value |
|---|---|
| Structural Deck Power | 49 |
| Going First | 45 |
| Going Second | 42 |
| Meta Power | provisional |
| Tournament Reliability | 40 |
- Primary strategy: Midrange
- Secondary strategies: Combo, Toolbox
- Format: ocg
Legality
Main 43 / Extra 14 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 2 violation(s).
Identity & game plan
- Win condition: Snake-Eyes Flamberge Dragon, Azamina and Diabellstar boss monsters, converted from Snake-Eye and White Forest engine chains; Sinful Spoils and Azamina Fusion lines that recycle through the GY
- Turn 1 (going first): Snake-Eye Ash or Oak or Poplar Normal Summon, chain into a Snake-Eye monster, then pivot to a boss via Diabellstar or Flamberge (text-only read; no recorded boards)
- Turn 2 (going second): Hand traps (Ash Blossom, Infinite Impermanence) to slow the opponent, then rebuild the board with White Forest and Sinful Spoils searchers
- Recovery: Searchers (18 text-based) rebuild the hand; GY recursion via Snake-Eye and White Forest effects
- After siding: No side deck; post-side plan cannot be assessed
Why it scores here
The deck is evaluated as a connected system, not as an average of its card scores. Its searcher density (P(at least one searcher in an opening 5) ≈ 0.94) makes the starter reasonably accessible on paper, but the engine is split across Snake-Eye, White Forest, Azamina, Sinful Spoils and Diabell, with 57 of 62 archetype-tagged main-deck copies off the deck's named archetype, so the lines are only partly coherent. Interaction is credible but thin, with 4 hand traps and about 10 negation-text cards, and it is weaker on the going-second side because there is no side deck. The deck has no recorded boards, so its conversion ceiling and median output are text-only inference. Popularity and archetype usage stats confirm that a similar list is real, but they earned no points, and the score is capped low because two cards exceed their copy limits, so the list is illegal in OCG.
Dimension scores
| # | Dimension | Score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Engine Accessibility & Consistency | 60 | P(≥1 searcher in opening 5) ≈ 0.94; P(≥1 of a 2-copy engine starter) ≈ 0.22; engine is split across sub-archetypes (Inferred) |
| D2 | Opening-Hand Quality & Brick Management | 50 | 18 searcher-text cards and 17 Level 0 spells/traps give good hand function, but split engine pieces risk dead cards (Inferred) |
| D3 | Combo Conversion & Ceiling | 50 | No parseable boards; ceiling read from text only (Snake-Eye chains into Flamberge/Diabellstar and Azamina Fusion) (Inferred) |
| D4 | Combo Floor & Median Output | 40 | median power index unavailable; floor is unknown because there are no recorded boards (Inferred) |
| D5 | Interruption Resilience & Route Redundancy | 55 | Ash, Impermanence and Blossom give recovery after one interruption; the Snake-Eye GY recursion is text-based (Inferred) |
| D6 | Resource Economy, Recovery & Grind | 50 | Recursion via Snake-Eye and White Forest GY effects and searchers; no resource signature data (Inferred) |
| D7 | End-Board & Interaction Quality | 60 | Ash Blossom ×2, Infinite Impermanence ×2, Sinful Spoils of Betrayal and Azamina Moa Regina give layered negation text (Inferred semantic read) |
| D8 | Going-Second & Board-Breaking Power | 45 | Going-second split unavailable; hand traps P ≈ 0.46 on going second; Vouiburial and Chaos Angel help break boards (Inferred) |
| D9 | Offensive Pressure & Closing Power | 60 | Azamina 4000 ATK, Queen Azamina 2500, Diabellstar the Black Witch 2500, Flamberge 3000 give closing power (Verified stat / Inferred use) |
| D10 | Main Deck Efficiency & Flexibility | 45 | 43 main cards across 31 distinct names with 4 archetype families; limited coherence and compactness (Inferred) |
| D11 | Extra Deck Efficiency & Coverage | 60 | 14 Extra Deck cards (5 Fusion, 4 Synchro, 4 Link, 1 XYZ) cover many summon routes (Verified composition / Inferred use) |
| D12 | Side Deck Adaptability | 10 | No side deck, so post-side adaptability is effectively absent (Verified composition) |
| D13 | Matchup Coverage & Format Fit | 35 | No tournament link or dated meta sample; archetype share unknown (Provisional) |
| D14 | Pilotability & Error Tolerance | 35 | Multi-archetype engine with many decision points and several Fusion/Synchro steps; hard to pilot consistently (Inferred) |
How the score was computed
Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 49, Going First ≈ 45, Going Second ≈ 42, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 40. Modifiers: Illegal copy limit (-12). Final formula: 0.80*Structural(49.2) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(40) = 47.4, then illegal-list modifier −12 → 35 (Meta provisional)
Probability & combo summary
- Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.94 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
- Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
- Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines
Strengths
- Searcher density gives high P(≥1 searcher in opening 5)
- Layered negation: Ash Blossom ×2, Infinite Impermanence ×2, Sinful Spoils of Betrayal
- Several high-ATK closers (Azamina 4000, Flamberge 3000, Queen Azamina 2500, Diabellstar 2500)
Weaknesses
- Illegal list: two cards over their copy limit
- Engine split across Snake-Eye, White Forest, Azamina, Sinful Spoils and Diabell with low archetype purity
- No side deck
- No recorded boards, so conversion and median output are unverified
Critical choke points
- Snake-Eye Ash is the main Snake-Eye starter and is over the copy limit
- Extra Deck Fusion summons depend on Saint Azamina / Azamina Fusion lines
Recommended changes
| Priority | Remove | Add | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 Snake-Eye Ash and 1 WANTED: Seeker of Sinful Spoils | Replace with 1 copy each of an in-list searcher or a 1-of Snake-Eye support card that is legal at the copy limit | Makes the list legal so it can receive a normal final score; both cards are limited to 1 copy. |
| 2 | One White Forest or Azamina off-archetype support card | A consistent Snake-Eye or Diabell card | Raises archetype purity and engine coherence; 57 off-archetype copies dilute the engine. |
Evidence & confidence
- Verified: Legality: 43 main, 14 extra, 0 side; Snake-Eye Ash and WANTED each over the copy limit; Card text and stats from the resolved card list; Usage statistics: 3 of 7 core cards present (42.9%)
- Inferred: D1 consistency from hypergeometric draw odds; Interaction density from text roles (negation ×10, removal ×7); Going-first and going-second read from text and hand-trap odds
- Provisional: Meta Power (no dated metagame sample); Matchup and format fit (no tournament link)
- Data gaps: No combos supplied: floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent No win-rate telemetry for going-first/second, matchups or brick rates Meta Power is provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied No guides attached for the archetype
error
Couldn't load the combos
Menu
https://metaduelist.com/