Odd-Eyes Deck #772055 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 54/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Stun
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 57 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Pendulum-summoned Odd-Eyes and Extra Deck boards (Odd-Eyes Vortex Dragon, Clear Wing Synchro Dragon, Supreme King Dragon Dark Rebellion) protected by hand-trap interaction.; Mulcharmy draw-engine card advantage and Supreme King Gate Zero recovery over a longer game.
• Turn 1 (going first): Set Pendulum scales with Performapal Odd-Eyes Seer or Performapal Skullcrobat Joker, search the Odd-Eyes core, then extend through Link and Fusion monsters.
• Turn 2 (going second): Use hand traps (Effect Veiler, Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring, Ghost Ogre & Snow Rabbit, Ghost Belle & Haunted Mansion) to disrupt the opponent's first board, then push with the Extra Deck.
• Recovery: Searchers (Performapal Odd-Eyes Seer, Performapal Gentrude, Spiral Flame Strike) and Mulcharmy draws rebuild the hand after a clean-up.
• After siding: None. The deck has no Side Deck, so there is no best-of-3 post-side plan.

Why it scores here

The deck reliably opens its Pendulum and searcher lines: 27 searcher-text cards give about a 97 percent chance of at least one in a 5-card opening hand, although the six-copy Odd-Eyes core is live only about 44 percent of the time. Its interaction package (9 hand traps, 20 negation-text cards, 27 removal-text cards) keeps the engine alive through disruption and gives it a real going-second plan. Its ceiling comes from Extra Deck boards such as Odd-Eyes Vortex Dragon, Clear Wing and Supreme King Dark Rebellion, but there are no recorded boards, so median output and combo conversion are text-based inferences. Popularity did not earn points, and no card scores were averaged; the score comes from the system's consistency, interaction and resilience, reduced by the missing Side Deck and the multi-archetype engine conflicts.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange primary with Stun secondary, reflecting the hand-trap interaction package. Structural ≈ 60.8, Going First ≈ 58, Going Second ≈ 62, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 55. Modifiers: No Side Deck (-3); Engine conflicts across sub-archetypes (-2); Banlist exposure (-1). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers (Meta provisional) = 0.80*60.8 + 0.20*55 - 6 = 53.6, rounded to 54

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.44 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense searcher text (27 cards) keeps a 5-card hand live about 97 percent of the time
• Nine hand traps plus about 20 negation-text cards give layered interaction on the opponent's turn
• Extra Deck variety (Fusion, Link, Xyz, Synchro) gives multiple board-ending options
• Recursion through Mulcharmy draws and Spiral Flame Strike supports a grind game

Weaknesses

• No Side Deck, so there is no post-side plan
• Low exact-archetype purity (15.3%) and several sub-archetype engines that may conflict
• Odd-Eyes core of 6 copies is live in a 5-card hand only about 44 percent of the time
• Single-copy Limited cards (Bystial) and Semi-Limited Ash Blossom create banlist exposure

Critical choke points

• Pendulum zone setup: two valid scales are needed before the engine can run
• The Odd-Eyes core (6 copies) is the primary starter, so a hand without it leans on searchers
• Going first with no hand trap relies entirely on the Pendulum opening

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legal in OCG: Main 57 in range 40 to 60, Extra 15 in range 0 to 15, Side 0 in range 0 to 15; Limited cards run at legal limits (Bystial Druiswurm 1, Bystial Magnamhut 1); Ash Blossom at 2 (Semi-Limited); Exact archetype purity 15.3%; 27 searcher-text cards; 9 hand traps; 20 negation-text cards; Extra Deck breakdown: Fusion 4, Link 6, Xyz 2, Synchro 3
• Inferred: D1 engine consistency from hypergeometric starter odds; Interaction quality from card text (negation and removal hints); Ceiling and median reads from text, because no combos were recorded; Going-first and going-second estimates
• Provisional: Meta power (null; no dated metagame sample); Matchup and format fit (no tournament link or meta share)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied, so the combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link, so archetype meta share and per-pilot records are absent No win-rate telemetry, so going-first, going-second and matchup results are Unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied No Side Deck, so post-side adaptability cannot be measured