Voiceless Voice Deck #771227 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 35/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 1 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Ritual Summon LIGHT Ritual Monsters (Saffira, Skull Guardian, Sauravis) via Prayers/Blessing/Pre-Preparation, then convert with high-ATK ritual bodies and Link/Synchro/Fusion extra-deck pressure; Odd-Eyes Pendulumgraph Dragon and Skull Guardian ATK growth through Lo, the Prayers of the Voiceless Voice in the field or GY
• Turn 1 (going first): Pre-Preparation or Blessing for the Ritual Spell, Prayers to Ritual Summon a LIGHT Ritual Monster, Lo for ATK and recursion, Diviner or Trias Hierarchia for board presence; the plan is not formally sequenced because no combo boards were supplied
• Turn 2 (going second): Hand traps (Ash Blossom, Maxx C, Infinite Impermanence, Dominus Purge) to break the opponent's first chain, then the same Ritual route to rebuild the board
• Recovery: Radiance and Barrier of the Voiceless Voice to re-add Ritual Monsters or Ritual Spells, Lo and Skull Guardian recursion from the GY, and Dogmatika Maximus or Odd-Eyes Pendulumgraph Dragon to re-add Ritual Spells
• After siding: Not evaluable: the deck runs a zero-card Side Deck, so there is no post-side plan

Why it scores here

The deck is a Ritual-centred engine: the archetype core is almost always present in the opening hand (P at least one core card ≈ 0.9998) and 16 searcher-text cards add redundant access to the Ritual Spells and Ritual Monsters. Its interaction is layered across six hand traps, Ash Blossom, Maxx C, Infinite Impermanence and Dominus Purge, plus Sauravis and Radiance, which keeps the engine alive through a first disruption and gives it a real going-second plan. Conversion is strong on paper (Saffira at 2550 ATK, Skull Guardian gaining 2050 ATK from Lo, Odd-Eyes and Garura as closers), but no recorded boards exist, so the ceiling and median are text-only inferences. The score is not based on popularity: the archetype is widely used (core cards in 70–93% of stat rows), but that only confirms the list is real, and the score was not an average of card scores. The deck is Illegal (4 copies of Saffira against a 3-copy limit), so the structural score of about 64 is capped to 35 under the Illegal rule, and the zero-card Side Deck removes any post-side plan.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 64.4, Going First ≈ 66, Going Second ≈ 65, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 58. Modifiers: Illegal copy limit (cap) (-23); Banlist exposure (-3); No side deck (-2). Final formula: Illegal deck: pre-cap 0.80*64.4 + 0.20*58 + modifiers (-5) = 58.1, capped to 35 (theoretical/structural-only; no normal Final score). Meta provisional.

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 1 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Core engine is near-certain to appear in the opening hand
• Layered interaction: six hand traps plus Sauravis and Radiance
• Strong closing bodies including Saffira, Skull Guardian and Odd-Eyes
• Compact 40-card main with no off-plan singletons beyond tech

Weaknesses

• Illegal copy limit on Saffira (4 vs 3)
• No side deck, so no post-side plan
• Heavy dependence on a single Ritual Spell chain
• Restricted-card exposure to Limited/Semi-Limited status

Critical choke points

• Single-copy Blessing and Pre-Preparation are the key Ritual Spell access points
• Lo, the Prayers of the Voiceless Voice is the hub for ATK and recursion

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Illegal status: Saffira runs 4 copies against an OCG limit of 3; Main 40, Extra 15, Side 0 meet the OCG size rules; Seven restricted cards at legal copies; Usage stats: core cards in 70–93% of archetype rows
• Inferred: Engine accessibility from hypergeometric estimates (0.9998 core, 0.9354 searcher); Hand-trap going-second estimate 0.6496; Brick and conflict risk from composition; Interaction quality from card text; Closing power from ATK values and text
• Provisional: Meta power null; no dated metagame sample; Matchup and format fit; no tournament data
• Data gaps: No combos supplied; combo floor/median/ceiling is text-only inference No tournament link; archetype meta-share and pilot record absent No win-rate telemetry (going-first/second, matchup, brick/starter rates) Meta Power provisional