Mulcharmy Deck #770417 — Yu-Gi-Oh! TCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 35/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox
• Format: tcg

Legality

Main 56 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 8 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Extra Deck boss pressure (Vidolium 5000 ATK, Elfnote June Pride 3100 ATK, Galaxy-Eyes Photon Lord, Mediclius) once the Mulcharmy/Elfnote draw-and-summon engine has established a board; Synchro and Link beatsticks (Stardust, Elfnote Seraphim, Assault Blackwing) after Ars Magna and Power Patron recursion
• Turn 1 (going first): Open with Mulcharmy monsters and Elfnote/Power Patron starters; hold Ash Blossom and Droll for the opponent's first activations and build toward Extra Deck summons
• Turn 2 (going second): Use hand traps (Ash, Ghost Ogre, Effect Veiler, Nibiru, Droll) to disrupt the opponent's board, then convert the Mulcharmy draw engine into an Extra Deck boss
• Recovery: Recur Mulcharmy monsters and Ars Magna monsters from the GY and banishment, and redraw through the Mulcharmy 'no cards' draw effects
• After siding: Not evaluable: the export contains no side deck, so post-side adaptation cannot be scored

Why it scores here

The score is structural and theoretical only, because the list is illegal: it runs 8 copy-limit violations and 5 Forbidden cards in the TCG format. The deck reliably opens its core engine, with 13 Mulcharmy-named copies giving an estimated 74.8% chance of at least one in a five-card opening hand (Inferred). Its disruption suite (12 hand traps, about 78% at least one in a six-card going-second hand) and its Extra Deck bosses give it real end-board interaction and closing power. The deck is held back by a loose, multi-archetype build (exact Mulcharmy purity 11.3%), a 56-card main deck with 14 zero-level spells and traps, no side deck, and the absence of any recorded combos or tournament data. The score comes from consistency, interaction and closing power as a system; it does not come from averaging card scores or from the archetype's popularity.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange primary, Toolbox secondary, disclosed as a single Midrange profile for scoring. Structural ≈ 54, Going First ≈ 55, Going Second ≈ 58, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 45. Modifiers: banlist exposure (-8); unrecoverable_no_cards_condition (-2); no Side Deck (-2). Final formula: Illegal cap applied. 0.80*54 + 0.20*45 = 52.2; modifiers -12 gives 40; capped at 35 for an illegal list (theoretical/structural only). Meta provisional.

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.75 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.25 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Consistent core starter access (Mulcharmy draw engine, 13 copies)
• Heavy interaction suite: 12 hand traps and 10 negation-text cards
• Strong Extra Deck closers (Vidolium, June Pride, Mediclius, Galaxy-Eyes)

Weaknesses

• Illegal copy-limit and Forbidden-card violations
• Loose multi-archetype build with low exact archetype purity (11.3%)
• Bloated 56-card main deck with 14 zero-level spells and traps
• No side deck and no post-side plan

Critical choke points

• Mulcharmy 'control no cards' condition gates the draw and recursion engine
• Forbidden and Limited cards (Elfnote Tinia, F.A. Dawn Dragster, Triple Tactics Talent, Called by the Grave, Crystal Wing) must be removed before this list is legal

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality: 8 copy-limit violations and 5 Forbidden cards in TCG; Card stats and text for all 56 main and 15 Extra cards; Archetype usage: Mulcharmy Fuwalos 97.7%, Ash Blossom 90.9%, Droll 84.1%, Purulia 77.3%
• Inferred: Starter access 0.748 and brick proxy 0.252; Hand-trap density and going-second disruption; Closing power from boss ATK and Extra Deck access
• Provisional: Meta Power (no dated metagame sample); Matchup fit (no tournament data); Post-side plan (no side deck in export)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent No win-rate telemetry for going-first, matchups or brick rates Meta Power is provisional without a dated metagame sample No side deck in the export