Sacred Beast Deck #769452 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Midrange, Toolbox
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 59 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Illegal. 4 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Special Summon Level 10 Sacred Beast monsters (Hamon, Raviel, Uria, Chaotic Phantasmal Sacred Beasts route) and convert the board into a 4000+ ATK boss with negation and removal support (Inferred from card text; no recorded boards); Fiendsmith and Mulcharmy sub-engines providing extra draw and Link/Fusion pressure (Inferred)
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a Sacred Beast Spell (Thunderclap or Released) to search a Level 10 Sacred Beast, Special Summon it via a Sacred Beast effect, then protect the board with Ash Blossom and Ghost Ogre-type hand traps (Inferred)
• Turn 2 (going second): Use hand traps (11 in the list) to answer the opponent's first summon or Spell/Trap, then rebuild with Martyr and Summoner of the Sacred Beasts (Inferred)
• Recovery: Recycle Sacred Beasts Released from the GY and the Phantasm Special Summon-from-GY text, plus Mulcharmy draw effects (Inferred from card text)
• After siding: Not evaluable: the deck has 0 Side Deck cards, so there is no post-side plan (Verified from evidence)

Why it scores here

The deck's Level 10 Sacred Beast engine is reasonably accessible: the archetype core (27 copies) gives about 96% chance of at least one core card in a 5-card opening hand (Inferred hypergeometric estimate), and the Spell searchers are run at 3 copies each. Interaction is dense, with 11 hand traps and about 7 negation-text cards, which supports the end-board and resilience scores. Conversion and floor are not measurable: there are no parseable recorded boards, so the combo ceiling and median are Inferred from card text only and scored conservatively. The deck is illegal as built (two Forbidden cards and two over-limit Limited/Semi-Limited cards), so the score is capped at a theoretical, structural-only value. Popularity and archetype usage stats were not used to add points, and card scores were not averaged into the deck score.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 51, Going First ≈ 52, Going Second ≈ 44, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 40. Modifiers: banlist exposure (-6); hard-garnet / sub-archetype burden (-4); engine conflicts (-2). Final formula: No reliable metagame: 0.80*Structural(51.25) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(40) = 49.0; modifiers total -12 = 37.0; Illegal-deck cap applied -> 30 (theoretical, structural-only)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.24 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Archetype core is dense (27 copies) and reliably opens (Inferred)
• Heavy hand-trap and negation coverage (11 hand traps, 7 negation-text cards) (Verified tags, Inferred use)
• Compact Level 10 boss package with 4000+ ATK bosses (Verified stats)

Weaknesses

• Illegal as built: 2 Forbidden cards and 2 copy-limit violations (Verified)
• Empty Side Deck, so no post-side adaptability (Verified)
• Three sub-archetypes dilute engine coherence (Verified composition)

Critical choke points

• Level 10 Sacred Beast Special Summon enablers (Verified text dependence)
• Forbidden and Limited Fiendsmith cards in the Extra Deck (Verified legality)

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Main Deck 59 cards, Extra 15, Side 0 (within size rules); Forbidden: Triple Tactics Talent, Varudras (1 copy each); Copy-limit violations: Ash Blossom 3 vs 2, Fiendsmith Engraver 3 vs 1; Extra Deck: 5 Fusion, 5 Link, 4 Xyz, 1 Synchro; Archetype purity 0% exact name; 74 off-archetype copies
• Inferred: Starter access from hypergeometric odds (0.237 per 3-copy card; 0.96 archetype core); Engine line from Level 10 Sacred Beast Special Summon text; Hand-trap interaction density from role tags and card text
• Provisional: Meta power is null: no dated metagame sample; Tournament reliability and format fit: no tournament link
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent No win-rate telemetry for going-first/second, matchup or brick rates Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied Illegal list: score is a theoretical, structural-only cap