P.U.N.K. Deck #769126 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox, Tempo
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Illegal. 3 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Extra Deck boss summons from the P.U.N.K. and Fiendsmith pools (Ukiyoe-P.U.N.K. Amazing Dragon 3000 ATK, P.U.N.K. JAM Dragon Drive 2700 ATK, Fiendsmith's Lacrima 2400 ATK, Fiendsmith's Desirae 2800 ATK) (Inferred from card text); Recursion of P.U.N.K. and Fiendsmith monsters from GY via Noh-P.U.N.K. Deer Note, Fiendsmith Engraver and Lacrima the Crimson Tears (Inferred from card text)
• Turn 1 (going first): Open on the 22-card archetype core (P(≥1 core card in opening 5) ≈ 0.93) and use a P.U.N.K. Tuner or Noh-P.U.N.K. starter to reach a Synchro/Fusion boss; no recorded boards to confirm the sequence (Inferred)
• Turn 2 (going second): Use 9 hand traps (P(≥1 hand trap in opening 6) ≈ 0.68) to interrupt the opponent's first combo, then rebuild through P.U.N.K. recursion (Inferred)
• Recovery: Rebuild from GY through Noh-P.U.N.K. Deer Note, Lacrima the Crimson Tears and P.U.N.K. JAM Extreme Session recursion, with 15 Extra Deck slots as a second resource (Inferred)
• After siding: None: the deck runs zero Side Deck cards, so there is no defined post-side plan

Why it scores here

The deck's 22-card P.U.N.K. and Fiendsmith core is very likely to be present in the opening hand (P(≥1 core card in 5) ≈ 0.93, Inferred), which earns the engine-accessibility score. Nine hand traps and about 15 interruption cards give the deck real answers on both turns, so interaction and resilience score above average. Conversion and median output score low because the evidence has no recorded boards, no combos and no win-rate telemetry, so those scores are text-only inference. The deck is Illegal under OCG copy limits (Ash Blossom ×3 vs 2, Fiendsmith Engraver ×2 vs 1, Fiendsmith's Tract ×2 vs 1), so the score is capped at 30 and labelled theoretical/structural-only. Popularity was not rewarded: the archetype core stats only confirm the cards are real and accessible, and the deck's card scores were not averaged.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 54, Going First ≈ 52, Going Second ≈ 56, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 45. Modifiers: banlist exposure (-6); engine conflicts (-4). Final formula: No reliable metagame: 0.80*Structural(54) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(45) + ContextModifiers(-10) = 42; Illegal cap applied (3 copy-limit violations), score set to 30; theoretical/structural-only

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.25 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Archetype core is very likely to appear in the opening hand (P ≈ 0.93, Inferred)
• Nine hand traps plus layered removal and negation give real interaction on both turns
• Multiple Extra-Deck boss routes at 2400–3000 ATK
• Recursion from the GY gives a second resource loop

Weaknesses

• Illegal under OCG copy limits in three cards (Ash Blossom ×3, Engraver ×2, Tract ×2)
• No Side Deck: no post-side plan
• Three archetype engines compete for the same hand slots
• No recorded combos or win-rate data to confirm conversion

Critical choke points

• Limited-status Fiendsmith Engraver and Tract are the only route into the Fiendsmith engine; running them over the limit makes the list illegal
• Ash Blossom at three copies is over its Semi-Limited limit

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Main 55, Extra 15, Side 0 (within OCG size rules); Three copy-limit violations: Ash Blossom ×3 (legal 2), Fiendsmith Engraver ×2 (legal 1), Fiendsmith's Tract ×2 (legal 1); Seven Limited cards and one Semi-Limited card in the deck
• Observed: Usage stats: 70.6% of the archetype's core cards are present in this list
• Inferred: Opening-hand hypergeometric estimates (≈0.93 core, ≈0.25 per 3-copy starter, ≈0.68 hand trap on the draw); Going-first and going-second plans and the interaction density read; Recursion and boss routes from card text
• Provisional: Meta Power (no dated metagame sample); Matchup/format fit (D13)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent No win-rate telemetry (going-first/second, matchup, brick/starter/OTK rates) Meta Power is Provisional without a dated metagame sample Deck title is null in the export