DoomZ Deck #769048 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 35/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Midrange, Extra-Deck Xyz/Link engine
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 2 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Extra-Deck Xyz/Link boards (DoomZ XII End - Drastrius, DoomZ Break - Diactorus, Jupiter the Power Patron of Destruction, Vidolium) built off DoomZ/Power Patron/Medius summon chains; Recursive Power Patron pressure via Mulcharmy draw engine and Ars Magna buffs, with Varudras as an illegal, non-playable upside
• Turn 1 (going first): Starter from Jupredo, Power Patron DoomZ, DoomZ Raiders or DoomZ Change (archetype core present in 98.7 percent of 5-card openers), searcher into a DoomZ monster, then Xyz Summon from the Extra Deck
• Turn 2 (going second): Ash Blossom and the three hand traps to interrupt the opponent's first starter, then rebuild through Mulcharmy draws and DoomZ searchers into a single Extra-Deck board
• Recovery: Recursion through Medius and Theorealize Overdrive, Ars Magna GY/banish effects, and Mulcharmy draws to rebuild after a clean interruption
• After siding: Not applicable: the deck runs 0 side cards, so there is no post-side plan and no sideboarding evidence

Why it scores here

The deck's core DoomZ and Power Patron cards are present in 98.7 percent of five-card openers and the searcher text group in 97.6 percent, so the engine is reliably accessible on the system level (Inferred from hypergeometric draws). Its ceiling comes from Extra-Deck Xyz and Link boards such as DoomZ XII End, Jupiter and Vidolium, with interaction from Ash Blossom, Regulus and Drastrius, but no recorded board data exists, so conversion and median output are text-based estimates only. The deck has no side plan and a 43.6 percent exact-name archetype purity spread across Power Patron, Mulcharmy, Ars Magna, Medius and Theorealize, which lowers consistency and pilotability. The list is illegal (three copies of a Semi-Limited card and one Forbidden card), so the score is capped as a theoretical, structural-only read. Popularity and archetype usage were not used to raise the score, and card scores were not averaged.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo weights used; Midrange reading applied only to the secondary-strategy note. Structural ≈ 57, Going First ≈ 60, Going Second ≈ 52, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 45. Modifiers: banlist_exposure (-8); sideless_build (-4). Final formula: 0.80*Structural(57) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(45) = 54.8; modifiers -12 = 42.8; Illegal cap applied = 35 (theoretical/structural-only). Meta Power provisional/null.

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.98 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.01 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Archetype core is accessible in almost every opening hand (Inferred from hypergeometric draws)
• Strong end-board ATK from Vidolium, Jupiter and Nerva
• Layered interaction from Ash Blossom, Regulus, Artmage Diactorus and Drastrius
• Recursion and draw engines (Mulcharmy, Medius, Ars Magna) support rebuilding

Weaknesses

• Illegal list: over copy limit on Ash Blossom and a Forbidden Varudras slot
• No side deck, so no post-side adaptation
• Low exact-archetype purity (43.6 percent) across six related sub-archetypes
• No recorded boards, so the combo ceiling and median are unmeasured

Critical choke points

• Single DoomZ monster or Medius starter in hand: when it is removed or negated, the Extra-Deck chain can stall
• Reliance on Extra-Deck Xyz material from a small set of Level 4 and Level 8 monsters

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Main 40, Extra 15, Side 0 sizes within OCG size rules; Ash Blossom at 3 copies versus 2 legal; Varudras Forbidden with 1 copy; Archetype core present in 98.7 percent of 5-card openers (computed hypergeometric)
• Inferred: Opening-hand consistency and starter access estimates; Interaction density read from card text; Going-first and going-second strength reads
• Provisional: Meta and matchup fit (no dated meta sample); Tournament reliability
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent No win-rate telemetry for going-first, going-second, matchups or brick rates Meta Power is provisional without a dated metagame sample Deck title is null in the export Deck has zero side cards, so post-side evidence is absent