Invoked Deck #768763 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 31/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Midrange, Toolbox
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Illegal. 5 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Albaz Dragon Extra Deck fusions (Mirrorjade, The Dragon that Devours the Dogma, Lubellion, Titaniklad) built from Fallen of Albaz (Fallen of the White Dragon, 2 copies, is treated as Fallen of Albaz) plus a 2500+ ATK partner; Dogmatika board via Dogmatika Ecclesia, Dogmatika Maximus and Dogmatika Fleurdelis, with Dogmatika Punishment and the negation text for removal and interaction
• Turn 1 (going first): Open with Fallen of the White Dragon or Dogmatika Ecclesia, search through Terraforming, Magical Meltdown or Super Polymerization, and go to an Albaz fusion; Invoked lines are not live without Aleister the Invoker, which is not resolved in the list
• Turn 2 (going second): Use the 9 hand traps (Ash Blossom, Infinite Impermanence, Evenly Matched) to slow the opponent's first summon, then rebuild through Fallen of Albaz and Dogmatika monsters
• Recovery: Recover from GY through Dogmatika Maximus banish-Fusion revival and Fallen of the White Dragon GY-to-hand search; no recorded boards to confirm this
• After siding: No side deck is registered (0 of 15 slots), so there is no post-side plan

Why it scores here

The deck's reliable core is the Albaz/Dogmatika engine: Fallen of the White Dragon and Fallen of Albaz open into Albaz Dragon fusions, and Dogmatika Ecclesia and Maximus add board presence. The Invoked and Bystial pieces are weaker, because three Invoked Extra Deck fusions need Aleister the Invoker, which is not resolved in the list, and the two Limited Bystial dragons compete for the same slots. Hand traps (9 copies) and negation text (20 cards) give the deck real interaction, but the list runs 14 off-archetype cards and no side deck, which pulls down consistency and post-game adaptability. The deck is illegal: three copies of Semi-Limited cards and three Forbidden cards, so it is capped low and scored only structurally. Popularity did not earn points, and the card scores were not averaged.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 42.7, Going First ≈ 40, Going Second ≈ 45, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 35. Modifiers: banlist_exposure (-6); engine_conflicts (-4). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional); Illegal deck, so the result is capped low and labelled structural/theoretical only (unclamped blend about 41, then modifiers -10 and cap)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.81 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Albaz Dragon fusion route with 3000 ATK bosses and a clear Fallen of Albaz starter
• Dense interaction: 9 hand traps plus negation text across 20 cards
• Real Extra Deck access through 13 Fusion monsters

Weaknesses

• Illegal: copy limits and Forbidden cards must be fixed before any normal score applies
• Invoked fusions have no enabler in the resolved list
• Side deck is empty, so there is no post-side plan
• High off-archetype count (12.9% purity) weakens consistency

Critical choke points

• Fallen of Albaz / Fallen of the White Dragon as the single Albaz starter
• Aleister the Invoker (absent) for all Invoked fusions
• Magical Meltdown and Terraforming as the only searchers into the engine

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Illegal status with 5 violations (Forbidden and over-copy cards); Main 55, Extra 15, Side 0 against size rules 40-60 / 0-15 / 0-15; Archetype purity 12.9%, 61 off-archetype copies; One passcode (86120751) could not be resolved
• Observed: Usage stats: Mulcharmy Fuwalos, Magical Meltdown and Ash Blossom are common in the archetype, but the deck has no recorded boards
• Inferred: Starter access about 0.81 for the archetype-core group; Dead-hand and brick risk from hand traps and off-archetype tech; Interaction quality from negation text; Structural weighting with the Combo profile
• Provisional: Meta Power is null (no dated sample); Matchup and format fit (D13) with no tournament data
• Data gaps: No combos supplied, so floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link, so archetype meta-share and pilot match record are absent One passcode (86120751) could not be resolved to a card and is counted as main No win-rate, brick, or going-first/second telemetry in YGOVN Meta Power is provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied No side deck, so post-side performance cannot be assessed