Dragunity Deck #767477 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Toolbox
• Secondary strategies: Midrange, Stun
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 2 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Sacred Beast / Phantasm Level 10 boss monsters (Infinity of the Sacred Beasts - Raviel, Inferno of the Sacred Beasts - Uria, Calamity of the Sacred Beasts - Hamon) and the Chaotic Phantasmal Sacred Beasts fusion, supported by Dragunity Link/Synchro extra-deck pieces and Superdreadnought Rail Cannon Gustav Rocket (Inferred from card text); Gustav Max direct damage plus Dragunity Knight - Areadbhair board breaking (Inferred from card text)
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a Sacred Beast starter that searches a Level 10 Sacred Beast via Card of the Soul, Sacred Beasts Released or Thunderclap, then Special Summon a Phantasm boss while holding hand traps (Ash Blossom, Ghost Ogre, Nibiru) for the opponent's turn (Inferred)
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold Ash Blossom, Ghost Ogre, Droll & Lock Bird, Nibiru and Evenly Matched to interrupt the opponent's first board, then rebuild through Mulcharmy draw effects (Inferred)
• Recovery: Recover through Sacred Beast search effects in the GY (Sacred Beasts Released, Calamity and Infinity hand reveals) and Pot of Sloth card draw (Inferred)
• After siding: Not evaluable: the deck has no side deck, so no post-side plan can be built as submitted

Why it scores here

The deck's score comes from how its systems interact, not from averaging its cards. Its Sacred Beast search engine (Card of the Soul, Sacred Beasts Released, Thunderclap) gives a 0.92 searcher-text proxy, so a starter is usually reachable, but the Level 10 Phantasm bosses need a specific Sacred Beast in hand. Its interaction (Ash Blossom, Ghost Ogre, Nibiru, Droll, Solemn Judgment, Evenly Matched) is dense and gives reasonable going-second resilience. The deck is capped low because it is Illegal: three Ash Blossom copies exceed the Semi-Limited limit of two, and no combo, win-rate, or side-deck evidence exists. Its 66 off-archetype copies and 22 generic cards show a toolbox-like build rather than a focused engine, and popularity or archetype usage stats were not counted toward the score.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Balanced (default; strategy unclear, Toolbox-leaning). Structural ≈ 48, Going First ≈ 42, Going Second ≈ 48, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 42. Modifiers: Illegal copy-limit violation (-12); Empty side deck (0). Final formula: Illegal cap: min(0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + modifiers, 30) = min(0.80*48 + 0.20*42 - 12, 30); Meta provisional, theoretical/structural-only

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.92 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense hand-trap and negation suite (Ash Blossom, Ghost Ogre, Nibiru, Droll & Lock Bird, Solemn Judgment, Evenly Matched)
• Strong search density (21 searcher-text cards) for finding Sacred Beast starters
• High-ceiling Level 10 Phantasm bosses and 5000-ATK extra-deck finishers

Weaknesses

• Illegal as submitted: Ash Blossom run 3 copies against a limit of 2
• Unfocused build: only 4 exact-name Dragunity copies and 66 off-archetype copies
• No side deck, so no post-side adaptability
• No recorded combos or win-rate data to verify any line

Critical choke points

• Dependence on a Level 10 Sacred Beast in hand for every Phantasm boss summon
• Third Ash Blossom copy is illegal and must be cut before the list can be played

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 sizes are within OCG rules (40-60 / 0-15 / 0-15); Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring: 3 copies run against Semi-Limited limit 2 (illegal); Copy histogram, archetype purity (5.7% exact-name) and role-tag counts come from the evidence pack
• Inferred: Searcher density and Sacred Beast starter access support a consistent T1 opening (~0.92 searcher proxy); Hand-trap and negation density give going-second resilience; Brick risk is moderate given 25 distinct main names and multiple 3-of pieces
• Provisional: Meta Power (no dated metagame sample); Matchup fit (no tournament context)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor/median/ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and pilot match record absent No win-rate telemetry (going-first/second, matchup, brick/starter rates) Meta Power is provisional without a dated metagame sample No side deck, so post-side performance cannot be assessed Deck title is null