Charmer Deck #767306 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

55 Main, 15 Extra, incl. Mulcharmy Fuwalos x3, Nibiru, the Primal Being x3, Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring x3. Created Oct 20, 2026 by YGO Mod.

Deck Charmer OCG

Created by: YGO Mod (20517634)

Created On: 10/20/2026

 
 


Official AI Deck Power Analysis
MidrangeConfidence: LowEvaluated Oct 30, 2026
30± 8/ 100
Power Score
Structural 46
Reliability 35
Going First 42
Going Second 55

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

Overall score Value
Structural Deck Power 46
Going First 42
Going Second 55
Meta Power provisional
Tournament Reliability 35
  • Primary strategy: Midrange
  • Secondary strategies: Control, Toolbox
  • Format: ocg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 1 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

  • Win condition: Extra-Deck beatdown from Xyz/Link bodies (Divine Serpent Apophis, Anubis, Super Starslayer TY-PHON, Mediclius) once the Apophis/Temple of the Kings line is live; Generic beatsticks and Trap-line value (Apophis the Serpent, Apophis the Swamp Deity, Mulcharmy draw engine)
  • Turn 1 (going first): Open a starter from the Temple of the Kings / Apophis core (about 61% for at least one core card in a 5-card hand, Inferred) and use Treasures/Terraforming/Pot searchers to find the next piece
  • Turn 2 (going second): Use the 16 hand traps (about 89% to hold at least one in a 6-card hand, Inferred) to answer the opponent's first summon, then convert through the Extra Deck
  • Recovery: Mulcharmy draw effects plus the searcher text (about 72% for at least one searcher in 5 cards, Inferred) to rebuild after a hand-trap-for-hand-trap exchange
  • After siding: Not evaluable: side_count is 0 and no side deck is supplied, so there is no post-side plan to score

Why it scores here

The deck's engine is the Temple of the Kings / Apophis core (9 core copies, about 61% to open at least one in a 5-card hand, Inferred), but 70 of 'archetype-adjacent' copies are off-archetype (0% exact-name purity), so the engine is diluted and not reliably live on turn 1 or 2. Its real strength is interaction density: 16 hand traps, 17 negation-text cards and 21 removal-text cards give strong end-board and going-second answers (Inferred from text and role flags). Output is not measured: no combos were supplied, so median and ceiling are text-only estimates and are kept low. Popularity did not earn points: the Charmer archetype usage data confirms the list is real, but the score is not raised by it, and no card scores were averaged. The deck is Illegal (3 copies of Ash Blossom against an OCG Semi-Limited limit of 2), so the raw structural blend of about 44 is capped to 30 and labelled theoretical only.

Dimension scores

# Dimension Score Evidence
D1 Engine Accessibility & Consistency 45 P(at least one core card in 5-card hand) ~0.61 across 9 core copies; 70 off-archetype copies dilute the engine (Inferred)
D2 Opening-Hand Quality & Brick Management 42 Brick risk from 33 generic copies and 16 hand traps that need a board to act; no combo data to confirm (Inferred)
D3 Combo Conversion & Ceiling 40 Ceiling read from text only: Divine Serpent Apophis and Anubis lines exist, but there are 0 parseable boards (Inferred)
D4 Combo Floor & Median Output 35 Median output unknown: combos_evidence has 0 scored boards, so this is a low-confidence text estimate (Inferred)
D5 Interruption Resilience & Route Redundancy 52 Redundant hand-trap and negation density (16 hand traps, 17 negation texts) gives multiple answer routes after disruption (Inferred)
D6 Resource Economy, Recovery & Grind 45 Searcher text on 12 cards plus Mulcharmy draw effects; Extra Deck Xyz/Link costs are not resource-modelled because no combos exist (Inferred)
D7 End-Board & Interaction Quality 62 Layered interaction: Solemn Judgment, Apophis, Dominus Purge, Verdict of Anubis, Ash Blossom x3 (text-role flags, Inferred)
D8 Going-Second & Board-Breaking Power 58 Going-second split not measured; hand-trap coverage ~0.89 in a 6-card hand supports going-second answers (Inferred)
D9 Offensive Pressure & Closing Power 52 Closing ATK from 3000-ATK Anubis and Lord of the Heavenly Prison, 2800-ATK Divine Serpent Apophis; delivery depends on the Apophis line (Inferred)
D10 Main Deck Efficiency & Flexibility 38 55 main cards with 33 generic-name copies and 0% exact-name purity; compact archetype engine is not evident (Inferred)
D11 Extra Deck Efficiency & Coverage 55 15 Extra slots used across Xyz, Link and Fusion with a broad mix; usage data disagrees on S:P Little Knight (gap noted) (Observed/Inferred)
D12 Side Deck Adaptability 15 side_count 0: no side deck to evaluate, so the post-side plan is not scoreable (Verified)
D13 Matchup Coverage & Format Fit 40 No tournament link and no dated meta sample; excluded from structural via renormalisation (Provisional)
D14 Pilotability & Error Tolerance 45 Many timing-sensitive hand-trap and Trap-activation decisions plus a multi-deck Extra Deck line; error tolerance is moderate (Inferred)

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange, D13 dropped and weights renormalised over 95 (meta-neutral). Structural ≈ 46, Going First ≈ 42, Going Second ≈ 55, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 35. Modifiers: Illegal-deck cap (-14). Final formula: Raw: 0.80*Structural(46) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(35) = 44; Illegal cap applied (Step 2) -> 30, theoretical/structural only

Probability & combo summary

  • Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.61 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.39 (all Inferred)
  • Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
  • Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

  • Dense hand-trap and negation coverage (16 hand traps, 17 negation texts)
  • Layered end-board interaction (Solemn Judgment, Apophis, Dominus Purge, Verdict of Anubis)
  • High going-second answer probability (about 0.89 for a hand trap in 6 cards)
  • Strong Extra-Deck closing bodies (Anubis 3000 ATK, Divine Serpent Apophis 2800 ATK)

Weaknesses

  • Illegal list: Ash Blossom over copy limit
  • Engine diluted: 70 off-archetype copies, 0% exact-name purity
  • No combo evidence, so ceiling and median are unmeasured
  • No side deck, so no post-side adaptation

Critical choke points

  • Temple of the Kings / Apophis core: the 9 core copies must appear to open the engine (about 61% in 5 cards)
  • Hand-trap exchange on turn 1: if the first answer is stopped, the list has no clear fallback
Priority Remove Add Reason
1 1 copy of Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring a legal non-Ash playable card from the same role (hand trap or interaction) Restores legality; the deck is otherwise Illegal and cannot receive a normal score
2 Off-archetype generic copies with weakest role fit additional Temple of the Kings / Apophis-line cards Raises engine accessibility and exact-name purity (D1, D10)
3 none a side deck (up to 15 cards) Enables a post-side plan for best-of-3 play (D12)

Evidence & confidence

  • Verified: Illegal status: Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring at 3 copies vs OCG Semi-Limited limit 2; Main 55 and Extra 15 are within OCG size rules; side 0 is within [0,15]; Core archetype group of 9 copies and P(>=1 in hand5) = 0.606 from hypergeometric output; Usage stats: 5 of 6 core cards present (83.3%)
  • Observed: Charmer archetype is real and in use (usage_statistics available)
  • Inferred: Engine accessibility and brick estimates (D1, D2); Hand-trap going-second coverage (~0.89); Interaction quality from role tags and text (D7, D8); Ceiling and median read from text only (D3, D4)
  • Provisional: Meta Power and matchup fit: no dated meta sample or tournament link (D13 excluded)
  • Data gaps: Illegal copy count: Ash Blossom at 3 copies vs OCG Semi-Limited limit 2 (cap applied) No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent No win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN; going-first/second and matchup signals are Inferred Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied Deck title is null Usage statistics mark S:P Little Knight as not in this deck, but the card list shows 1 copy in the Extra Deck; the discrepancy is unresolved No side deck (side_count 0): no post-side evaluation possible

More OCG Info

Charmer

Charmer Breakdown

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 
https://metaduelist.com/
Top