Familiar-Possessed Deck #766997 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox, Tempo
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 59 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Illegal. 2 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Familiar-Possessed / Charmer / K9 boss monsters (Charmers of the Grand Circle, K9-X Werewolf, Number C104, Rciela) overwhelming the board once the engine is live (Inferred from text); Recursion-driven Xyz and Link extension from Spellbook, K9 and Mulcharmy card advantage (Inferred from text)
• Turn 1 (going first): Normal Summon a searcher (Mulcharmy Purulia, K9-66b Lantern, Spellbook Magician of Prophecy) to gather Spellbook/K9/Charmer pieces, keeping Ash Blossom or Droll up for the opponent's first interaction (Inferred)
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold Ash Blossom, Ghost Belle, Infinite Impermanence or Droll through the opponent's first activation, then convert with Charmer fusion or Xyz (Inferred)
• Recovery: Spellbook of Knowledge and Mulcharmy draw effects rebuild the hand from the GY; K9-X Forced Release and Lupis re-deploy boss monsters (Inferred)
• After siding: No side deck is registered, so there is no post-side plan; the list cannot adapt between games (Verified)

Why it scores here

The deck scores on the system, not by averaging its cards: 22 searcher-text cards make a live starter likely (P of at least one searcher in an opening 5 is about 0.91, Inferred), and nine hand traps plus about 15 negation effects give it layered interaction on both turns. Its real weakness is that the list is illegal as built: Ash Blossom and K9-17 Izuna are each run three times against a limit of two, which caps the score under the rubric. There are no recorded combo boards and no guides, so the ceiling and median are text-only inferences and are scored conservatively. Popularity was not credited: the archetype's usage statistics only confirm that the core pieces are accessible, and no tournament or win-rate data exists. The 0-card side deck removes any post-side adaptation, and the 40-card-to-60-card build with about 12 tech slots and a heavy archetype-spread mix lowers consistency and error tolerance.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: 0.8 Midrange + 0.2 Toolbox. Structural ≈ 54, Going First ≈ 52, Going Second ≈ 58, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 45. Modifiers: banlist_exposure (-12); engine_conflicts (-4); illegal_cap (-6). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers = 0.80*54 + 0.20*45 - 16 = 36.2, capped to 30 because the deck is Illegal (copy-limit violations); Meta provisional

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.91 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Searcher density: 22 searcher-text cards make a live starter likely in the opening hand (Inferred)
• Layered interaction: 9 hand traps and about 15 negation effects cover both turns (Inferred)
• Varied extra deck with Xyz, Link, Fusion and Synchro bosses (Verified composition)

Weaknesses

• Illegal as built: two cards run three copies against a limit of two (Verified)
• No side deck, so no post-side adaptation (Verified)
• No recorded combos or guides, so the ceiling and median are unsupported (Verified data gap)
• Heavy tech and four sub-archetypes reduce consistency (Inferred)

Critical choke points

• Ash Blossom and K9-17 Izuna copy count must be cut to 2 before the list is playable (Verified)
• Archetype core pieces are a 5-copy group with about 37% opening-hand access (Inferred)

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Deck is Illegal: Ash Blossom and K9-17 Izuna each run 3 copies against OCG Semi-Limited limit of 2; Main 59 and Extra 15 are within size rules; Side 0 is legal; Searcher text count 22; negation 15; removal 16; hand trap 9; Extra-deck boss ATK values as listed in the cards array
• Inferred: Opening-hand starter reliability about 0.91 for searcher-text group (hypergeometric); Going-second hand-trap coverage about 0.65 (hypergeometric); Engine conflicts from multiple archetype sub-engines; Interaction quality from negation and removal text
• Provisional: Meta fit and matchup coverage (no dated meta sample); Tournament reliability (no tournament data)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied; combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link; archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent No win-rate telemetry; going-first/second, matchup and brick rates are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power provisional: no dated metagame sample No side deck and no guides attached