Book Of Deck #765698 — Yu-Gi-Oh! TCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 31/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Toolbox
• Secondary strategies: Midrange
• Format: tcg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Illegal. 4 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Dragon beatdown: Blue-Eyes White Dragon x3, Tyrant Dragon x3 and Tri-Horned Dragon x3 pressure the board; Tyrant Dragon can attack twice.; Blue-Eyes Ultimate Dragon from the Extra Deck, but the evidence shows no Fusion enabler in the Main Deck to reach it.
• Turn 1 (going first): Lord of D. (3 copies) enables The Flute of Summoning Dragon (3 copies) to Special Summon up to 2 Dragons from hand; Book of Moon and Solemn Judgment (1 legal copy) provide early interaction.
• Turn 2 (going second): Remove or stall the opponent's board with Smashing Ground, Shield Crush, Nobleman of Crossout and Mirror Force, then rebuild Dragon pressure through the Flute line.
• Recovery: Mystic Tomato and Morphing Jar recycle the board; Premature Burial (1 legal copy) can revive a Graveyard monster at an 800 LP cost.
• After siding: None. The list runs 0 Side Deck cards, so there is no post-side plan in the evidence.

Why it scores here

This deck is Illegal in TCG as submitted: Solemn Judgment is run 3 times against a limit of 1, and Heavy Storm, Pot of Greed and Graceful Charity are Forbidden, so the result is structural-only and capped low. Its Dragon core (Lord of D., The Flute of Summoning Dragon, Blue-Eyes White Dragon, Tyrant Dragon, Tri-Horned Dragon) gives a real beatdown plan, but the Flute line depends on Lord of D. being on the field, which the Main Deck reaches with about a 25% chance in an opening 5-card hand. The 15-card Fusion Extra Deck has no Fusion enabler in the Main Deck, so most of it is unreachable as built. Interaction is reasonable (Mirror Force, Sakuretsu Armor, Shield Crush, Smashing Ground, Nobleman of Crossout, Royal Decree), but the Side Deck is empty and there are no combos or tournament results, so no win-rate read is possible. The score comes from the system: consistency, interaction, and the Dragon pressure line, not from averaging the individual card scores or from the archetype's usage statistics.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Toolbox. Structural ≈ 40, Going First ≈ 36, Going Second ≈ 42, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 33. Modifiers: banlist exposure (-6); unrecoverable choke point (-2). Final formula: No reliable metagame: 0.80*Structural(40) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(33) = 38.6, then ContextModifiers -8 = 30.6 -> 31; Illegal deck, so theoretical/structural-only and capped low

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.25 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dragon beaters (BEWD x3, Tyrant Dragon, Tri-Horned Dragon) give real closing pressure
• Broad legal interaction across removal, negation and spell/trap control
• Flute of Summoning Dragon plus Lord of D. gives a live Special Summon line

Weaknesses

• Illegal as built: four copy-limit and banlist violations
• No Fusion enabler, so 15 Extra Deck Fusion monsters are largely unreachable
• No Side Deck
• Archetype identity weak: 4.3% exact Book Of purity

Critical choke points

• Lord of D. must be on the field before The Flute of Summoning Dragon works
• Fusion Extra Deck access depends on a Fusion enabler not present in the Main Deck

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality: Illegal (Solemn Judgment 3/1 copies; Heavy Storm, Pot of Greed, Graceful Charity Forbidden); Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 against TCG size rules; Card text and stats for all listed cards; Archetype stat: 9 of 18 core cards present (50%)
• Inferred: Engine access via Lord of D. and Flute (~25% opening-hand starter); No Fusion enabler in the Main Deck, so the Extra Deck is largely unreachable; Interaction quality and going-second board breaking from card text; Consistency and brick estimates from hypergeometric draws
• Provisional: Meta Power and matchup fit (no dated metagame sample or tournament link)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent No win-rate telemetry for going-first, going-second, matchups or brick rates Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied Title is null on the deck record