Odion Deck #765438 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 55/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Control
• Secondary strategies: Stun, Toolbox
• Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Extra Deck pressure from Divine Serpent Apophis, Baronne de Fleur and Chengying, converted after the Temple of the Kings / Apophis trap engine has stripped the opponent's interaction; Link and Synchro beatsticks (Silhouhatte Rabbit, S:P Little Knight, Link Spider) once the board is stable
• Turn 1 (going first): Normal Summon The Man with the Mark or Primite Dragon Ether Beryl, search Temple of the Kings / Apophis traps, hold up Solemn and Dominus negation while building toward a Link or Synchro Extra Deck summon
• Turn 2 (going second): Use hand traps (Ash Blossom, Infinite Impermanence, Maxx C) and Solemn/Dominus traps to answer the opponent's first board, then rebuild through Apophis the Serpent and Treasures of the Kings
• Recovery: Recycle Traps from the GY through Treasures of the Kings, Dominus Impulse/Purge and Apophis the Serpent's Set effect; Dimensional Fissure works against this recovery route
• After siding: Not defined: the deck runs an empty Side Deck, so there is no recorded post-side adjustment

Why it scores here

The deck reliably opens its engine: the archetype core is present in 38 copies, the searcher text group reaches roughly 90% in a five-card hand, and Treasures of the Kings with Apophis traps gives a repeatable search route (Inferred from the hypergeometric estimates). Its strongest quality is interaction density: 23 negation-text cards, 5 hand traps and 3 Solemn cards let the deck answer a large share of the opponent's summons and activations, which lifts the endboard and resilience dimensions. Conversion is weaker. No recorded boards, combos or guides exist, so the ceiling and median are text-only inferences, and the Extra Deck threats are strong on paper but depend on a trap-heavy hand surviving. The score does not come from Odion's popularity or from averaging card scores; it reflects the system's interaction, Extra Deck coverage and engine access, reduced by the empty Side Deck, the lack of a dated meta sample and the unverified median output.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Control. Structural ≈ 59, Going First ≈ 58, Going Second ≈ 52, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 52. Modifiers: no side deck (-2); banlist exposure (-1). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional) + ContextModifiers = 0.80*59.3 + 0.20*52 - 3 ≈ 55

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.9 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Interaction density: 23 negation-text cards, 5 hand traps and 3 Solemn cards cover summons, activations and Trap sets
• Engine access: archetype core in 38 copies and roughly 90% searcher presence in a five-card hand
• Extra Deck coverage across all four summon types with mandatory-light Link access

Weaknesses

• No Side Deck, so the deck cannot adapt in a best-of-3 format
• Off-archetype spread (55 of 40 cards outside the exact Odion name) weakens engine coherence
• Dimensional Fissure conflicts with the GY recursion that Apophis and Treasures depend on
• No recorded boards, combos or guides, so the output ceiling and median are unmeasured

Critical choke points

• Temple of the Kings and Apophis trap access depends on Treasures of the Kings (2 copies, Semi-Limited)
• The Extra Deck pressure relies on a small number of Link and Synchro enablers, so losing one searcher or Link material slows the closing turn

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legal status: 40 Main, 15 Extra, 0 Side; all restricted cards within legal copy limits (Verified legality); Archetype core present in 38 copies; usage stats show Odion core cards at 100% inclusion (Verified usage stat); Card text read from resolved card list: 23 negation, 17 removal, 14 searcher hits (Verified text scaffold)
• Inferred: Engine access P ≈ 0.90 from hypergeometric searcher estimate; Interaction quality from negation and hand-trap text; Structural score built from the Control weight profile; Going-first and going-second power estimates; Extra Deck coverage read from the summon-type breakdown
• Provisional: Meta Power (null; no dated metagame sample); Format fit and matchup coverage (D13 set at neutral value)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied; combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link; archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent No Side Deck entries; post-side performance cannot be evaluated No win-rate telemetry; going-first, going-second and matchup rates unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied