Endymion Deck #764006 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 25/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Stun, Toolbox
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Illegal. 4 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Witchcrafter Madame Rilliona (3800 ATK Fusion) and Witchcrafter Vice-Madame, reached through Witchcrafter/Magistus searches and Fusion Summons (Inferred from card text); Endymion / Magistus Link and Fusion boards with equip and negation support (Inferred)
• Turn 1 (going first): Search a Witchcrafter enabler (Walpurgis, Creation, Marka) and convert it into a Fusion or Link Summon while holding Ash Blossom / Effect Veiler for the opponent's response (Inferred)
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold Ash Blossom, Effect Veiler, Droll & Lock Bird, or Maxx C to answer the opponent's board, then rebuild through the Witchcrafter search chain (Inferred)
• Recovery: Witchcrafter GY-revival effects (Genni, Pittore, Schmietta, Terracottan) and Witchcrafter Creation's GY recursion (Inferred from text)
• After siding: Not assessable: side_count is 0, so no post-side plan exists in the evidence

Why it scores here

This list is illegal in OCG: four Forbidden cards (Charmer Quartet in Bloom, Borreload Savage Dragon, Red-Eyes Dark Dragoon, Cross-Sheep) are run at 1 copy each, so it receives a capped theoretical score rather than a normal Final Contextual score. Its structural strength comes from the system: the 9 core Endymion/Witchcrafter/Magistus copies give roughly a 74% chance of at least one core card in the opening five (Inferred), and the 19 searcher-text cards and 8 negation-text cards let the engine find and protect its starter. Interaction is the strongest area (Ash Blossom x2, Effect Veiler x3, Maxx C, Droll & Lock Bird, Witchcrafter Haine, Witchcrafter Distortion) at 70 on D7 (Inferred from text). Floor and median output could not be measured because no boards were supplied, and the deck has no side deck, so post-side adaptability scores 10. Popularity was not used: the archetype is widely played, but this does not raise the score, and card scores were not averaged.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 53, Going First ≈ 55, Going Second ≈ 50, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 40. Modifiers: banlist_exposure (-12). Final formula: Illegal cap: 0.80*Structural(53) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(40) = 50.4, less banlist_exposure -12 = 38.4, capped at 25 for an illegal list. Theoretical / structural-only. Meta provisional.

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.74 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.26 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Strong interaction suite: Ash Blossom x2, Effect Veiler x3, Maxx C, Droll & Lock Bird, Witchcrafter Haine and Witchcrafter Distortion
• High searcher density (19 cards) for a 40-card main deck
• Coherent Witchcrafter / Magistus sub-archetype core with recursion through the GY

Weaknesses

• Illegal as built: four Forbidden cards, including two in the Extra Deck
• No side deck, so there is no post-side plan
• Only 9.1% exact-name archetype purity: 50 off-archetype copies could dilute the engine
• No recorded boards, so floor and median output are unmeasured

Critical choke points

• Witchcrafter Madame Verre and the Witchcrafter Fusion chain depend on Spellcaster fodder and Spell discards
• Forbidden Extra Deck cards (Borreload, Charmer Quartet, Red-Eyes Dragoon, Cross-Sheep) would leave Extra slots empty if removed without replacements

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Four Forbidden OCG cards are in the deck (legality); Main 40 and Extra 15 meet the OCG size rules; Ash Blossom x2 is within its Semi-Limited limit; Droll & Lock Bird and Maxx C are each run at 1 copy, within their Limited limit; Archetype spread and copy histogram; Archetype-core group: 9 copies, 74% at least one in hand 5
• Observed: Usage stats: 6 of 20 core cards present (30%)
• Inferred: Interaction density is high from role-text reads; Going-first and going-second plans; Searcher-driven consistency; Pilotability is hard from the multi-step Fusion and Witchcrafter chains
• Provisional: Meta Power is null because no dated metagame sample exists; Matchup fit (D13) with no tournament link
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot record are absent No win-rate telemetry for going-first, going-second, matchup or brick rates Meta Power is provisional without a dated metagame sample No side deck (side_count 0)