Voiceless Voice Deck #763531 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 20/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Illegal. 2 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Ritual Summon LIGHT Ritual Dragons/Warriors (Saffira, Skull Guardian, Sauravis) to establish large ATK boards, supported by Voiceless Voice spells and monsters; Odd-Eyes Pendulumgraph Dragon and Link/Synchro end-boards from the Extra Deck
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a Voiceless Voice starter (Lo, Prayers, Blessing, Barrier) and reach a Ritual Summon with Diviner/Mulcharmy draw support; hold hand traps and Herald/Ghost stops for the opponent's first answer
• Turn 2 (going second): Use hand traps (Ash Blossom, Ghost Belle, Infinite Impermanence, Droll) to break the opponent's first board, then extend through Ritual or Link Summon
• Recovery: Searchers (Blessing, Radiance, Pre-Preparation of Rites, Odd-Eyes Pendulumgraph) and Ritual Spell recursion to rebuild the Ritual line after a removal or floodgate-style answer
• After siding: Not evaluable: the deck has no side deck, so there is no post-side plan

Why it scores here

This list is illegal as submitted (4 Saffira against a limit of 3, and 2 Triple Tactics Talent although that card is Forbidden in OCG), so the score is a theoretical, structural-only read capped at 20. The structural read (57) comes from the system: 32 archetype-core copies give near-certain access to a starter in the opening hand (Inferred, about 0.99 for at least one core card in 5), and 16 hand traps plus 16 negation-text cards give a strong interaction layer. Median output is not measured because no combos were supplied, so the floor and ceiling are text-only inferences and are scored conservatively. The score does not reflect archetype popularity (the core has high usage), and it is not an average of the individual card scores. A 14-card side deck is absent, which caps post-side adaptability and reduces the going-second plan.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange profile only (secondary Toolbox noted, not blended). Structural ≈ 57, Going First ≈ 62, Going Second ≈ 52, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 48. Modifiers: banlist_exposure (-10); no_side_deck (-2). Final formula: Illegal cap: uncapped = 0.80*Structural(57) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(48) + modifiers(-12) = 43; capped to 20 as theoretical-only (Meta provisional)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.99 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Near-certain archetype-core access in the opening hand (0.99 for at least one core card)
• Layered interaction: 16 hand traps and multiple negation and removal spells
• Strong ATK on the ritual and link end-boards
• Recursion and searchers (Blessing, Radiance, Pre-Preparation) support a Ritual recovery route

Weaknesses

• Illegal list: 4 Saffira against a limit of 3, and 2 Forbidden Triple Tactics Talent
• No combo evidence, so the ceiling and median are unmeasured
• No side deck, so there is no post-side plan
• 25 tech cards and 16 hand traps raise brick risk and lower Ritual consistency
• Low exact-name archetype purity (21.4%)

Critical choke points

• Ritual Summon requirement: the Ritual Spell plus a LIGHT Warrior or Dragon must both be present, so missing either stalls the line
• Ritual Spell count is small relative to the Ritual monsters and needs search support
• Single Ritual/Link end-boards depend on the opponent's first answer not hitting them

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality: Saffira 4 copies vs 3 legal; Triple Tactics Talent 2 copies vs Forbidden; Main 55, Extra 15, Side 0 counts; Card stats and text for listed cards; Archetype core usage: 32 copies of core cards
• Observed: Usage stats: Lo, Skull Guardian, Radiance, Blessing are core cards in 87-96% of archetype lists
• Inferred: Starter access about 0.99 for at least one core card in 5; Interaction density (16 hand traps, 16 negation-text cards); Structural 57 from system-level weights; Going-second board-breaking via hand traps
• Provisional: Meta power and matchup fit (no dated metagame sample); Median output (no combos)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied, so floor, median and ceiling are text-only inferences No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent No win-rate telemetry (going-first/second, matchup, brick, starter rates) Meta Power provisional without a dated metagame sample No side deck supplied