DoomZ Deck #763385 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 25/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 42 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 3 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Xyz/Link boards from DoomZ and Power Patron engines (Jupiter 3500 ATK, Vidolium 5000 ATK, Drastea 2400 ATK) once a DoomZ starter is live.; Ars Magna and Medius recursion into Power Patron Link and Xyz pressure, plus Varudras as a one-card interaction finisher (illegal in this list).
• Turn 1 (going first): Search a DoomZ starter with DoomZ Raiders, DoomZ Change, Jupredo or Power Patron DoomZ, then Xyz or Link into a Power Patron board.
• Turn 2 (going second): Use Ash Blossom and Droll to disrupt the opponent's first engine, then rebuild through DoomZ VII/XII and Medius searches.
• Recovery: Recycle the GY through Medius, Theorealize Past Lull and Ars Magna cards to re-find DoomZ and Power Patron monsters.
• After siding: No side deck is registered, so there is no post-side plan in the evidence.

Why it scores here

The deck is scored as a connected DoomZ and Power Patron system, not as an average of its card scores. Its 29 archetype-core copies and 21 searcher-text cards give a high chance of a live starter in the opening hand, but exact-name purity is only 40.4% (34 off-archetype copies across Ars Magna, Power Patron, Medius, Mulcharmy and generic cards), which lowers consistency and engine coherence. Its ceiling comes from Power Patron Xyz and Link boards, but there are no parseable recorded boards, so conversion and median output are text-only Inferred reads. The deck has 5 hand traps and about 26 removal-text cards, which supports interaction, but it runs no side deck, so post-side adaptability scores low. The list is Illegal (Ash Blossom 3 vs 2, Droll 2 vs 1, Varudras 1 vs 0 in OCG), so the published score is capped at 25 as a theoretical, structural-only read. Popularity of the archetype did not earn points.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 57, Going First ≈ 55, Going Second ≈ 52, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 42. Modifiers: Banlist exposure (-8); Off-archetype dilution (-3). Final formula: No reliable metagame: Final = 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers = 0.80*57.1 + 0.20*42 - 11 = 43.1 uncapped; Illegal list, so the published score is capped at 25 (theoretical/structural-only, no normal Final Contextual score).

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 1 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense searcher text (21 cards) gives high odds of finding a DoomZ starter
• High-ATK Power Patron Xyz and Link finishers (Jupiter 3500, Vidolium 5000)
• Layered interaction: 5 hand traps, 5 negation-text cards and 26 removal-text cards
• 42-card main deck is inside the OCG size range

Weaknesses

• Illegal list: copy-limit violations on Ash Blossom, Droll & Lock Bird and Varudras
• Low exact-name archetype purity (40.4%) with 34 off-archetype copies
• No side deck, so no post-side plan
• No recorded boards, so ceiling and median are text-only

Critical choke points

• Legality: the list cannot be played in OCG until Ash Blossom, Droll and Varudras are corrected
• Starter access depends on a few DoomZ and Power Patron monsters with 1-3 copies each

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: OCG legality: Ash Blossom 3/2, Droll 2/1, Varudras 1/0 (Forbidden); Main 42 and Extra 15 counts are within size rules; Card text and stats for all listed cards; Archetype purity 40.4% and archetype spread
• Observed: Usage statistics show the archetype core is broadly run (core_present 16/23)
• Inferred: Opening-hand starter probabilities from hypergeometric draw tables; Engine coherence, brick risk and interaction quality from text; Going-first and going-second estimates; Hand-trap draw odds
• Provisional: Meta and format fit (no dated sample, no tournament link); Tournament reliability
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot record are absent No win-rate telemetry: going-first, going-second, matchup and brick rates are Inferred or Unknown No side deck registered: post-side adaptability is unmeasured Usage statistics disagree with the card list: six Extra Deck cards (DoomZ XIII Over, Gigantic Champion Sargas, Springans Merrymaker, DoomZ Break, Jupiter, DoomZ XII End) are marked in_this_deck=false in usage_statistics but appear in cards[] with copies>0, so missing_core is unreliable Meta Power is Provisional: no dated metagame sample supplied deck title is null