ZEXAL Deck #762710 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 44/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Toolbox
• Secondary strategies: Midrange, Fusion/Link
• Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 60 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Extra-Deck link and fusion beaters (Firewall Dragon Singularity 3500 ATK, Idaten 3000 ATK, Saryuja Skull Dread 2800 ATK), reached through searcher-driven Link and Fusion Summons (Inferred from card text); Warrior and Phantom Knights attackers with Bamboo Sword direct-attack support (Inferred)
• Turn 1 (going first): Search a Zexal, Warrior or Temple piece with Zexal Construction, Ascended Sage, The Man with the Mark or Phantom Knights, then Link or Fusion Summon (Inferred; no recorded boards)
• Turn 2 (going second): Use hand-trap-free interaction and Extra-Deck beaters after the opponent commits; the deck has no hand traps, so this relies on removal text and Rescue Ferret/Triple Burst Dragon negation (Inferred)
• Recovery: GY-banish searchers (Phantom Knights of Silent Boots, Phantom Knights of Ancient Cloak, Kaitoptera) re-fetch pieces across turns (Inferred)
• After siding: Not applicable: Master Duel list has 0 side cards, so no post-side adjustment exists in this build (Verified)

Why it scores here

The deck is scored as a system: 14 searcher-text copies give roughly a 75% chance of at least one searcher in an opening 5 (Inferred), and the 15 Extra-Deck slots are fully used with high-ATK Link and Fusion closers. Those strengths are offset by a loose build: 31 singleton main cards, 70 off-archetype copies, and an exact ZEXAL name purity of only 6.7%, which raises the risk of dead draws. There is no recorded board evidence, so the combo floor, median and ceiling rest on text reading and carry low weight. Interaction is limited to removal text and one negation effect with no hand traps, and there is no side deck. Archetype popularity and card-level strength were not added; the score comes from consistency, closing power and interaction on the list as built.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Toolbox primary; D13 dropped and weights renormalized over 95 (no metagame sample). Structural ≈ 49.6, Going First ≈ 51, Going Second ≈ 50, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 47. Modifiers: Diffuse engine / archetype conflict (-4); Limited-status cards (-1). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers (Meta provisional); 0.80*49.6 + 0.20*47 = 49.0, then -5 modifiers = 44

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.75 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• 14 searcher-text copies give ~75% chance of a searcher in an opening 5 (Inferred)
• Full Extra Deck (15 slots) with high-ATK Link and Fusion closers (Verified composition)
• Removal-text density of 12 cards and recovery via GY-banish searchers (Inferred)

Weaknesses

• Exact-name archetype purity of 6.7%; 70 off-archetype copies (Verified)
• 31 singleton main cards raise dead-card risk in openings (Inferred)
• No hand traps and no side deck (Verified)
• Fusion enablers limited to Fusion Gate and 3 Chain Material (Verified)
• Kaitoptera and Amazoness text reference Polymerization, which is not in the Main Deck (Verified)

Critical choke points

• Fusion Gate or Chain Material as the sole fusion enabler for most of the Extra Deck
• Zexal Construction (3 copies) as the main Zexal-branded searcher

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legal status; 60 main / 15 extra / 0 side within Master Duel size rules; Mudora the Sword Oracle and Reinforcement of the Army each run 1 copy of Limited cards; Exact-name archetype purity 6.7%; 70 off-archetype copies; Extra Deck is 9 Link, 5 Fusion, 1 Xyz
• Inferred: P(≥1 searcher in opening 5) ≈ 0.75 from hypergeometric estimate; Fusion and Link route feasibility from card text; Dead-card risk from singleton count and off-archetype copies; Interaction quality from removal and negation text
• Provisional: Meta Power (null, no dated metagame sample); D13 matchup and format fit; D12 side deck adaptability (0 side cards)
• Data gaps: no combos supplied: combo floor/median/ceiling is text-only inference no tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent usage_statistics in_this_deck appears to count only Main Deck copies (e.g. Proxy F Magician and Horned Saurus are in the Extra Deck but marked absent), so core_present_pct 40 likely understates coverage no win-rate telemetry (going-first/second, matchup, brick/starter rates) Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied no guides attached