Frog Deck #760052 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 20/100 (±5 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Stun, Xyz
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 30 / Side 0 — status: Illegal. 4 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Xyz monsters from the Extra Deck (Shark/Number/Galaxy-Eyes lines) overwhelming the board, with Armored Xyz and Full-Armored Xyz as Xyz-material support; Going-second disruption using hand traps (Ash Blossom, Effect Veiler, Infinite Impermanence, Forbidden Droplet) followed by Xyz pressure
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a WATER Fish starter (Buzzsaw Shark, Surfacing Big Jaws, Abyss Shark, Right-Hand Shark) to reach a Level 4 Xyz base, then Xyz Summon a Number or Stealth Kragen monster; cannot be confirmed without combo data
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold 2-3 hand traps to answer the opponent's first summon or activation, then rebuild a Xyz board from the remaining hand (Mulcharmy Fuwalos, Surfacing Big Jaws)
• Recovery: Xyz materials and graveyard Fish (Lifeless Leaffish, Armored Shark, LeVirtue Dragon) provide a limited re-summon route; the 14 tech and negation slots are dead cards once the board is cleared
• After siding: No Side Deck is registered, so there is no post-side plan; the deck cannot adapt between games of a best-of-3

Why it scores here

This deck is illegal in OCG as submitted: the Extra Deck holds 30 cards against a 15-card cap, Seventh Tachyon and Ash Blossom are over their copy limits, and Called by the Grave is a Forbidden card, so the normal Final Contextual score is capped and the numbers below are theoretical and structural only. The list is not Frog in substance: none of the 70 off-archetype copies are Frog cards, and the usage-stat core (Swap Frog, Freezing Chains, Mirror of the Ice Barrier) is entirely absent, so the Frog label has no basis in the deck. Its real system is a WATER Fish/Shark starter base feeding a large Xyz Extra Deck, supported by 9 hand traps and 14 negation or tech cards, which gives reasonable interaction density (D7) but a thin, unverified path from starter to board. No combo boards are recorded, so floor, median and ceiling cannot be separated from evidence and D3 and D4 rest on text inference. The score is not an average of card scores and does not reflect any popularity or meta share.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange primary, Stun secondary (disclosed; structural score only, not a Final score). Structural ≈ 40, Going First ≈ 38, Going Second ≈ 42, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 30. Modifiers: Banlist exposure (-8); Extra Deck size overflow (-4); Illegal cap (-6). Final formula: Illegal deck: 0.80*Structural(40) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(30) = 38, minus 12 modifiers = 26, then capped to 20 under the Illegal rule (theoretical/structural only; Meta provisional)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ — · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense hand-trap and negation suite (9 hand traps, 14 negation texts) for going second
• Broad Fish starter set (Buzzsaw Shark, Surfacing Big Jaws, Abyss Shark, Right-Hand Shark) gives several Level 4 bases
• High-ceiling Extra Deck threats (Number C107, Number C101, Number 107) if the list were legal

Weaknesses

• Illegal as submitted: Extra Deck 30 vs 15 cap, two over-limit cards, one Forbidden card
• No Side Deck, so no post-side plan in a best-of-3
• Frog label does not match the list; the archetype core is absent

Critical choke points

• Fish starter in hand: the Xyz base depends on a Level 4 WATER monster, and the 3-copy starters are about 34% each to appear in a 5-card opening hand
• Forbidden and over-limit cards must be removed before this list can be played at all

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Extra Deck size 30 exceeds OCG cap of 15; Seventh Tachyon 3 copies vs 1 legal; Ash Blossom 3 vs 2 legal; Called by the Grave Forbidden; Main Deck 40 cards within 40–60 range; Side Deck 0; Archetype purity 0% for the Frog name; 70 off-archetype copies
• Inferred: Starter probabilities from hypergeometric draw odds; Interaction density is high from text role hints; Functional roles and going-first/second plans from card text
• Provisional: Meta Power and format fit (no dated metagame sample)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied; combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link; archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent No Side Deck registered; post-side adaptability cannot be assessed No win-rate telemetry; going-first/second and matchup rates unknown Meta Power provisional without a dated metagame sample