Enneacraft Deck #759322 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 37/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Control
• Secondary strategies: Stun, Toolbox
• Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 60 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 2 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Pendulum and Synchro/Xyz boss monsters (Enneacraft - Asta.PIXEA, Atori.MAR, Atil.SPIA, Archa.TAIL, Aiza.LEON at 3000 ATK) that destroy or negate opposing monsters and spells, then convert the board into a finish; Burn via Enneapolis E.C. Counters (900 damage per counter at End Phase) and floodgate/lock pressure
• Turn 1 (going first): Open with Enneacraft Release or the Pendulum searchers (Ekto/Trito/Enato/Proto/Deftero tromarIA-family) to place Enneacraft Pendulum monsters, set up Enneapolis, and hold Ash Blossom / Maxx C as hand interaction
• Turn 2 (going second): Use Ash Blossom, Maxx C and Fydraulis Harmonia as hand traps against the opponent's starter, then rebuild Pendulum zones and extend into Synchro bosses
• Recovery: Enneacraft Reset and Enneacraft Reverth recur the Pendulum/E.C. pieces from the GY; Enneapolis re-places Enneacraft Pendulum monsters
• After siding: No side deck is registered, so no post-side plan can be evaluated

Why it scores here

This list is Illegal in master-duel: The Fallen & The Virtuous is run at 3 copies against a Semi-Limited limit of 2, and Dimension Shifter (Forbidden) is run at 1 copy. Under the rubric these violations cap the result, so the 37 is a theoretical, structural-only read and not a normal Final Contextual score. The deck's reliable plan is to open Enneacraft Pendulum pieces (archetype core present in about 98.5% of 5-card hands, Inferred) and convert them into negation and removal, then close with 3000-ATK Pendulum and Synchro bosses. Its strongest dimension is interaction density (D7), since the text shows multiple negate and destroy effects. Its ceiling and median are both unmeasured because no combos were supplied, so D3 and D4 are text-only and low-confidence. Popularity and archetype usage stats confirm the list is real, but they did not earn points, and card scores were not averaged into the deck score.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Control primary, Stun secondary (structural reference). Structural ≈ 51, Going First ≈ 50, Going Second ≈ 50, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 40. Modifiers: banlist exposure (-12). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional); Illegal list, theoretical/structural-only

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.99 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.01 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense negate and removal text (16 negation, 41 removal-text hits) for a control shell
• Strong Extra Deck bosses at 3000 ATK with destroy and negate effects
• Recursion through Enneacraft Reset and Reverth
• Archetype core is present in almost every opening hand (Inferred)

Weaknesses

• Illegal list: over-limit Fallen & Virtuous and Forbidden Dimension Shifter
• Exact-name purity 46.7%; many off-archetype copies weaken the engine
• No side deck
• No recorded boards, so ceiling and median cannot be verified
• Heavy Pendulum-zone and E.C. counter sequencing

Critical choke points

• Pendulum zone availability for the Enneacraft engine
• Enneapolis field presence for E.C. counter burn and recursion
• Forbidden Dimension Shifter and over-limit Fallen & Virtuous would have to be removed before any legal evaluation

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality: 60 main, 15 extra, 0 side; Dimension Shifter Forbidden, Fallen & Virtuous Semi-Limited with 3 copies run; Card text and stats from the evidence pack; Archetype purity 46.7% and copy histogram
• Observed: Usage stats show the Enneacraft core is run at 100% inclusion across the sample
• Inferred: Opening-hand consistency from hypergeometric estimates (about 0.985 for the core group); Interaction density and resilience from card text; Going-first and going-second estimates
• Provisional: Meta power (no dated sample); Matchup and format fit (no tournament data)
• Data gaps: no combos supplied; combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference no tournament link; archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent no win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN (going-first/second, matchup, brick/starter rates) Meta Power is provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied no side deck registered