Sinful Spoils Deck #754290 — Yu-Gi-Oh! TCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 25/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox, Combo
• Format: tcg

Legality

Main 57 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 12 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Sinful Spoils / Azamina Fusion boards with Sinful Spoils recursion, if the Forbidden and over-limit cards are removed (Theoretical only; the list as built is illegal); Link pressure from Firewall-free Link monsters and the Light and Darkness Ritual package (Theoretical only)
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a Sinful Spoils starter (Deception, Hallowed Azamina, WANTED) and search a Diabellstar or Azamina extender. Legal-copy ceilings make this line unreliable.
• Turn 2 (going second): Six-card hand with Ash Blossom, Droll, Solemn Warning, and Nibiru as the interaction layer, then re-engage through Light and Darkness Ritual or Sinful Spoils recursion.
• Recovery: Recursion from the GY through WANTED, Deception, and Light and Darkness Ritual searchers. Several recovery pieces are the illegal cards, so recovery depends on the removal of those cards.
• After siding: Not evaluable: the deck has no side deck (0 cards), so there is no post-side plan.

Why it scores here

This is an illegal list, so its score is a structural read capped low and is not a normal contextual score. It runs 57 Main and 15 Extra cards with no Side deck, and it breaks copy limits on four cards (Ash Blossom, Dominus Impulse, WANTED, Droll) and includes eight Forbidden cards in the Main and Extra decks. Its engine is real: the archetype core group gives about a 71% chance of at least one Sinful Spoils or Azamina starter in a 5-card opening, and it has 19 searcher-text cards and 8 hand traps. However, only 4 of 72 Main/Extra cards are exact Sinful Spoils names (5.6% purity), so the engine is spread across Light and Darkness Ritual, Magicians, Mulcharmy, and Link cards rather than a coherent core. No combo boards were recorded, so the ceiling and median scores are text-only inferences and stay low. The score does not reflect archetype popularity and does not average card scores.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: 0.8 Midrange + 0.2 Toolbox (Inferred from composition). Structural ≈ 38, Going First ≈ 36, Going Second ≈ 34, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 35. Modifiers: Banlist exposure (-8); Illegal copy overage (-4). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional), then Illegal modifiers (-12). Score capped low because the list is illegal.

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.71 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.29 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Real Sinful Spoils and Azamina engine with about 71% chance of an archetype-core card in an opening hand (Inferred)
• Dense interaction: 8 hand traps, 11 negation-text cards, and 19 removal-text cards (Verified flags, Inferred semantics)
• Heavy searcher and recursion text supports consistency and grind (Inferred)

Weaknesses

• Illegal as built: 8 Forbidden cards and 4 over-limit cards (Verified)
• Low archetype purity at 5.6% exact-name copies; the engine is spread across several sub-archetypes (Verified)
• No Side deck (Verified)
• No recorded combos, so the floor, median, and ceiling are unmeasured (Verified gap)

Critical choke points

• Forbidden Extra Deck cards (Azamina Ilia Silvia, Red-Eyes Dark Dragoon, Cross-Sheep, Protectcode Talker, Charmer Quartet) would need replacement before any play (Verified)
• Limited and Semi-Limited copies (WANTED at 3 copies vs 1 legal) make the Sinful Spoils loop unreliable as built (Verified)

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality status Illegal: 8 Forbidden cards and 4 over-limit cards in the Main and Extra decks; Main 57, Extra 15, Side 0 (size rules pass for Main and Extra; no Side deck); Exact-name archetype purity 5.6% (4 of 72); Usage stats available, but this deck has 7 of 25 core cards present (28%)
• Observed: No observed combo boards (combos_evidence total_combos 0)
• Inferred: Archetype-core opening probability about 0.71 (hypergeometric proxy); Interaction density is high from text and role flags; Midrange profile weights and the structural dimension scores; Going-first and going-second estimates
• Provisional: Meta Power is null: no dated metagame sample; Tournament reliability and matchup fit are estimates with no tournament link
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median, and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent No win-rate telemetry in YGOVN for going-first, going-second, matchup, or brick rates Meta Power is provisional without a dated metagame sample No guides attached (0) No Side deck, so post-side plans cannot be evaluated