Azamina Deck #751615 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Created by: YGO Mod (20517634)

Created On: 09/15/2026

 
 


Official AI Deck Power Analysis
ComboConfidence: Medium
56± 6/ 100
Power Score
Structural 59
Reliability 50
Going First 62
Going Second 50

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 56/100 (±6 · Confidence: Medium)

Overall score Value
Structural Deck Power 59.4
Going First 62
Going Second 50
Meta Power provisional
Tournament Reliability 50
  • Primary strategy: Combo
  • Secondary strategies: Midrange, Toolbox
  • Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 41 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

  • Win condition: Fusion Summon Azamina (4000 ATK) or Dark Magician of Destruction / Queen Azamina boards, enabled by Sinful Spoils and Diabell searchers and Azamina Fusion-Summon spells; Diabellstar and Diabellze boards with Diabell ATK gain and recursion from the GY, plus Azamina Mu Rcielago/Sol Erysichthon ATK pressure
  • Turn 1 (going first): Search a Diabell or Sinful Spoils card (Filia Diabell, WANTED, Sinful Spoils Subdual) and use Azamina Determination or The Hallowed Azamina to Fusion Summon Azamina or Saint Azamina, then extend through Azamina Debtors and Deception of the Sinful Spoils
  • Turn 2 (going second): Without hand traps, rely on Sinful Spoils of Betrayal/Slumber/Subversion removal and Snake-Eye to answer the opponent's first board, then Fusion Summon Azamina or Saint Azamina through the same searchers
  • Recovery: Recycle Sinful Spoils and Diabell spells from the GY with WANTED, Trap Holic and Traptantalizing Tune, and rebuild a Fusion line through Azamina Determination or Debtors
  • After siding: No side deck is registered; there is no post-side plan to evaluate

Why it scores here

The deck reliably opens an Azamina engine: 19 exact-name Azamina copies and 11 searcher-text cards give a P(at least one core card in an opening 5) of about 0.96, so the engine is almost always reachable on turn 1 (Inferred). Its ceiling is a Fusion-chained board with 4000-ATK Azamina and Saint Azamina plus Diabell and Dark Magician of Destruction pressure, but no recorded combo boards exist, so the ceiling and median are text-based estimates. Interaction is the strongest part: 22 removal-text and 3 negation-text cards, Sinful Spoils removal, and Azamina's on-field ATK reduction give layered end-board control, while the lack of hand traps keeps going-second answers weaker. The score comes from consistency, median output and interaction on the system, not from Azamina's popularity and not from averaging individual card scores. Only 8 main-deck monsters, 34% exact-name purity, zero side cards and a complex multi-step line pull the score down.

Dimension scores

# Dimension Score Evidence
D1 Engine Accessibility & Consistency 72 P(≥1 archetype core in opening 5) ≈ 0.96; P(≥1 searcher in 5) ≈ 0.81; 2-card bootstrap through Sinful Spoils and Diabell searchers (Inferred)
D2 Opening-Hand Quality & Brick Management 55 Only 8 main-deck monsters among 41 cards; roughly a third of opening hands by hypergeometric estimate have no monster; many Spell/Trap garnets (Inferred)
D3 Combo Conversion & Ceiling 62 Fusion-chain ceiling via Azamina, Saint Azamina and Queen Azamina boards; no parseable combos to confirm (Inferred semantic read)
D4 Combo Floor & Median Output 48 No recorded boards, so the typical output is uncertain; deck relies on a broad set of Fusion starters with unverified floor (Provisional)
D5 Interruption Resilience & Route Redundancy 55 Two or more independent starter routes (Azamina Determination, Debtors, Hallowed Azamina, Diabell searchers); no hand traps; recursion via WANTED and Trap Holic (Inferred)
D6 Resource Economy, Recovery & Grind 65 Searchers and GY recursion (WANTED, Deception, Gaze of Timaeus, Sinful Spoils banish-to-recur) make resources regenerate; no net-advantage data (Inferred)
D7 End-Board & Interaction Quality 70 22 removal-text and 3 negation-text cards plus Saint Azamina targeting protection and Azamina ATK reduction; layered interaction on the end board (Inferred semantic)
D8 Going-Second & Board-Breaking Power 58 No hand traps; going-second answers rest on Sinful Spoils removal and Snake-Eye, and boards must be rebuilt through Fusion (Inferred)
D9 Offensive Pressure & Closing Power 62 Azamina at 4000 ATK, Dark Magician of Destruction 2800 ATK, Diabellstar Vengeance 2500 ATK; piercing and direct text on Silvera-type effects (Verified stat / Inferred text)
D10 Main Deck Efficiency & Flexibility 58 41 main cards with 21 distinct names; 34% exact archetype purity with Diabell, Sinful Spoils and Timaeus crossover; compact enough but not tight (Verified count / Inferred)
D11 Extra Deck Efficiency & Coverage 66 15 Extra slots: 12 Fusion and 3 Synchro; Azamina core and Saint Azamina are 2 copies each, Azamina Fusion access is a strength (Verified composition)
D12 Side Deck Adaptability 10 Zero side-deck cards; no post-side plan possible (Verified count, no performance data)
D13 Matchup Coverage & Format Fit 50 No tournament link or dated meta sample; archetype usage is context only (Provisional)
D14 Pilotability & Error Tolerance 35 Multi-step Fusion chains with GY banish and shuffle costs and several once-per-turn gates; high decision load (Inferred)

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 59.4, Going First ≈ 62, Going Second ≈ 50, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 50. Modifiers: Extra-Deck dependence (-2). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional) + ContextModifiers = 0.80*59.4 + 0.20*50 - 2 = 55.5, rounded to 56

Probability & combo summary

  • Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.96 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
  • Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
  • Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

  • Core archetype access is very high (≈0.96 for at least one core card in an opening 5)
  • Layered removal and negation text across Sinful Spoils and Azamina effects
  • Fusion Summon routes to 4000-ATK and 2800-ATK bosses with Extra-Deck flexibility
  • Searchers and GY recursion keep the deck from running out of resources

Weaknesses

  • Only 8 main-deck monsters; Fusion requires Spell/Trap enablers that can clog the opening hand
  • No hand traps and no side deck, so going-second and matchup adaptation are weak
  • 34% exact archetype purity means the engine depends on Diabell and Sinful Spoils crossover
  • Multi-step line with many once-per-turn gates raises pilot error risk

Critical choke points

  • Sinful Spoils and Diabell searchers: if neither is drawn, the Azamina Fusion starter has no enabler
  • The single Extra-Deck Azamina access path is the main point of failure if a Fusion Summon is negated
  • Going second with no hand trap leaves the first board unanswered until Sinful Spoils removal resolves
Priority Remove Add Reason
1 1 Trap Holic 1 Sinful Spoils or Azamina enabler monster from the Main Deck Adds a main-deck monster to reduce monster-less openers and improve Fusion material access
2 1 Reasoning 1 hand trap or negate card for going second Creates a going-second answer to a first board; the deck has none today
3 none A 3–6 card side deck A side deck is required for post-side adaptation (D12 is 10 because it is empty)

Evidence & confidence

  • Verified: Main deck 41 cards, Extra 15, side 0; legal under master-duel size rules; WANTED: Seeker of Sinful Spoils is Limited at 1 copy and is run at 1; Card counts and copy histogram (3/2/1), Fusion/Synchro composition, 34% exact-name archetype purity; Usage statistics show 11 of 25 core cards present (44%)
  • Inferred: P(≥1 archetype core card in opening 5) ≈ 0.96 from hypergeometric draw; Azamina engine accessibility and roughly a third of opening hands lacking a main-deck monster; Interaction density from removal and negation text (semantic read); Going-second weakness from zero hand traps and zero side cards; Recovery through WANTED, Trap Holic and Traptantalizing Tune
  • Provisional: Meta Power (null: no dated metagame sample); Matchup and format fit (D13), since no tournament link or meta share exists; Median output (D4), since no recorded boards exist
  • Data gaps: no combos supplied — combo floor/median/ceiling is text-only inference no tournament link — archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent no win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN (going-first/second, matchup, game-level, brick/starter/OTK rates) — those signals are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied no side deck registered, so D12 post-side cannot be verified

More Master Duel Info

Azamina

Azamina Breakdown

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 
https://metaduelist.com/
Top