Red-Eyes Deck #736705 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 52/100 (±5 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: none
• Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Fusion summons via Red-Eyes Fusion supported by Ash Blossom, Dragon Ravine, and searchers to set up Big Blue for OTK
• Turn 1 (going first): Turn 1 Ash Blossom or Dragon Ravine; Turn 2 Red-Eyes Fusion into Red-Eyes Black Dragon or Big Blue for burst damage
• Recovery: Use hand traps and continuous searchers to find key pieces; recycle with Return of the Dragon Lords or similar if available; pivot to board control if combo stalls

Why it scores here

The deck runs a Red-Eyes Fusion engine with key searchers and hand traps, giving it a credible OTK ceiling, but it suffers from low consistency (many 1-ofs and a brick-prone hand), middling floor, fragile combo lines, limited interaction, and a weak post-side plan, producing a moderate overall score driven by its high ceiling and going-second potential.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Balanced (default). Structural ≈ 52, Going First ≈ 55, Going Second ≈ 65, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 45. Modifiers: none. Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.51 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.49 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Strong OTK ceiling with Red-Eyes Black Dragon + Big Blue recursion
• Solid hand-trap toolbox (Ash Blossom, Ghost Belle, Maxx "C")
• Good going-second disruption and access to six-card hands
• Includes multiple searchers and draw supports

Weaknesses

• Low engine consistency and high brick rate (~49% estimated)
• Fragile combo lines vulnerable to single disruption
• Limited explicit board control and removal
• Empty side deck prevents adaptation
• Mediocre floor and reliance on precise setup

Critical choke points

• Missing Red-Eyes Fusion in deck
• No reliable disruption versus backrow-heavy meta
• Dependence on drawing multiple engine pieces in one turn
• Vulnerable to hand trap suppression and meta shifts

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Inferred: d1_engine_accessibility_consistency; d2_opening_hand_brick_management; d3_combo_conversion_ceiling; d4_combo_floor_median_output; d5_interruption_resilience; d6_resource_economy_grind; d7_endboard_interaction_quality; d8_going_second_board_breaking; d9_offensive_closing_power; d10_main_deck_efficiency; d11_extra_deck_efficiency; d12_side_deck_adaptability; d13_matchup_format_fit; d14_pilotability_error_tolerance
• Data gaps: no combos supplied — combo floor/median/ceiling is text-only inference no tournament link — archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent no win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN (going-first/second, matchup, game-level, brick/starter/OTK rates) — those signals are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied