Odion Deck #700661 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel
Created by: YGO Mod (20517634)
Created On: 05/11/2026
Main Deck (40)
- Anubis the Last Judge x1
- Dimension Shifter x1
- Maxx "C" x1
- Primite Dragon Ether Beryl x2
- The Man with the Mark x3
- Labradorite Dragon x1
- Dimensional Fissure x3
- Primite Drillbeam x1
- Primite Lordly Lode x3
- Super Polymerization x3
- Treasures of the Kings x2
- Apophis the Serpent x2
- Apophis the Swamp Deity x2
- Dominus Impulse x2
- Dominus Purge x3
- Infinite Impermanence x3
- Solemn Judgment x1
- Solemn Strike x1
- Solemn Warning x1
- Songs of the Dominators x3
- Verdict of Anubis x1
Extra Deck (15)
- Divine Serpent Apophis x2
- Garura, Wings of Resonant Life x1
- Mudragon of the Swamp x1
- Predaplant Triphyoverutum x1
- Sea Monster of Theseus x1
- Secreterion Dragon x1
- Starving Venom Fusion Dragon x1
- Link Spider x1
- S:P Little Knight x1
- Silhouhatte Rabbit x1
- Baronne de Fleur x1
- Swordsoul Supreme Sovereign - Chengying x1
- Evilswarm Exciton Knight x1
- Super Starslayer TY-PHON - Sky Crisis x1
Couldn't load the deck
Deck — Deck Power Evaluation
Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)
| Overall score | Value |
|---|---|
| Structural Deck Power | 46 |
| Going First | 45 |
| Going Second | 50 |
| Meta Power | provisional |
| Tournament Reliability | 35 |
- Primary strategy: Toolbox
- Secondary strategies: Control
- Format: master-duel
Legality
Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Illegal. 2 violation(s).
Identity & game plan
- Win condition: Fusion/Link/Xyz boards from Extra Deck (Divine Serpent Apophis, Secreterion Dragon, Baronne de Fleur) after the trap-heavy setup, with Super Polymerization as the main Fusion enabler; Trap-based negation and removal (Dominus Purge/Impulse, Solemn trio, Apophis) grinding the opponent out before a late Extra Deck push
- Turn 1 (going first): Search or set Apophis / Treasures of the Kings / Primite Lordly Lode, then use the Extra Deck threats with interaction held in hand or Set
- Turn 2 (going second): Hand traps (Infinite Impermanence, Songs of the Dominators, Maxx C, Dimension Shifter if legal) on the opponent's summon, then rebuild via Man with the Mark and Primite searches
- Recovery: Recycle Trap cards from the Graveyard (Dominus and Apophis conditions) and search again with Treasures of the Kings and Man with the Mark
- After siding: Not evaluable: side deck is empty (0 cards), so no post-side plan can be established
Why it scores here
The deck's power comes from its system rather than from averaging card scores. Its main deck has strong interaction (three Solemns, Dominus Purge and Impulse, Infinite Impermanence, Songs of the Dominators, Apophis) and a searcher suite that makes at least one searcher likely in an opening hand. Its engines are split across sub-archetypes (Apophis, Dominus, Primite, Temple of the Kings, Solemn) with little shared route, which keeps D1, D3 and D4 moderate. The deck is illegal as submitted (three Super Polymerization against a limit of two, and a Forbidden Dimension Shifter), so its final score is capped at 30 and treated as theoretical only. Popularity or meta-share did not earn any points, since no tournament or usage evidence supports the list.
Dimension scores
| # | Dimension | Score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Engine Accessibility & Consistency | 45 | P(>=1 searcher-text card in 5-card hand) ~0.94; starter-type cards are 2-3 copies each, and no combo routes were supplied (Inferred) |
| D2 | Opening-Hand Quality & Brick Management | 38 | 19 traps and several conditional Set/GY-dependent cards (Dominus, Apophis, Solemn) create dead-hand risk; no brick rate measured (Inferred) |
| D3 | Combo Conversion & Ceiling | 40 | No recorded boards; ceiling is a text-only read of Fusion/Xyz/Link routes through Super Polymerization and Man with the Mark (Inferred) |
| D4 | Combo Floor & Median Output | 35 | No combo median or power distribution supplied; floor is unknown and set conservatively (Inferred) |
| D5 | Interruption Resilience & Route Redundancy | 45 | Recursion from Trap cards in the GY and multiple negation routes give some resilience, but no independent second line is confirmed (Inferred) |
| D6 | Resource Economy, Recovery & Grind | 50 | Searchers (16 text matches) and Primite Lordly Lode / Treasures support resource regeneration; no netCardAdvantage data (Inferred) |
| D7 | End-Board & Interaction Quality | 62 | 18 negation-text and 11 removal-text cards, three Solemns at LP cost, and layered Set traps give strong end-board interaction (Inferred semantic) |
| D8 | Going-Second & Board-Breaking Power | 58 | Solemn trio, Dominus Purge/Impulse and Apophis negate can challenge a going-second board; no going-second split data (Inferred) |
| D9 | Offensive Pressure & Closing Power | 45 | Extra Deck threats reach 2800-3000 ATK (Divine Serpent Apophis, Secreterion, Baronne, Chengying, Ty-Phon), but no closing-line data supports conversion (Verified stats / Inferred) |
| D10 | Main Deck Efficiency & Flexibility | 45 | 40 main with 21 distinct cards, nine singletons and 19 traps; reasonably compact but with mixed sub-archetype cards (Inferred) |
| D11 | Extra Deck Efficiency & Coverage | 55 | 14 distinct Extra Deck cards across 15 slots, with fusion-heavy access and a mix of Synchro/Xyz/Link routes (Verified composition) |
| D12 | Side Deck Adaptability | 30 | Side deck is empty (0 cards), so no adaptability can be credited (Verified) |
| D13 | Matchup Coverage & Format Fit | 40 | No tournament or metagame sample supplied; format fit is provisional only (Provisional) |
| D14 | Pilotability & Error Tolerance | 35 | Multiple timing-sensitive Set-trap plays and sub-archetype conditions raise pilot demands (Inferred) |
How the score was computed
Strategy profile: Toolbox. Structural ≈ 46, Going First ≈ 45, Going Second ≈ 50, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 35. Modifiers: banlist exposure (-10); engine conflicts (-2). Final formula: Illegal list: theoretical cap at 30. Uncapped would be 0.80*Structural(46) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(35) - 12 modifiers = ~32, capped to 30. Meta provisional (null).
Probability & combo summary
- Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.94 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
- Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
- Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines
Strengths
- Dense negation and removal suite (three Solemns, Dominus Purge, Dominus Impulse, Infinite Impermanence, Songs of the Dominators)
- Searcher density (16 text matches) makes at least one searcher likely in an opening hand
- Extra Deck has strong 3000-ATK options and full 15-slot usage
Weaknesses
- Illegal as submitted: Super Polymerization over limit and Dimension Shifter Forbidden
- Engines spread across Apophis, Dominus, Primite, Temple of the Kings and Solemn with weak shared routes
- Empty side deck gives no post-side plan
- No recorded combo or win-rate data to confirm any line
Critical choke points
- Super Polymerization is the single Fusion enabler, and it is over the copy limit
- Treasures of the Kings and Man with the Mark are the main searchers for the Apophis/Temple engine
Recommended changes
| Priority | Remove | Add | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 Super Polymerization and 1 Dimension Shifter | 2 legal cards (for example a second Fusion enabler or a Trap/Spell that fits the Apophis line), because the main deck would drop to 38 and fall below the 40-card minimum | Makes the list legal so it can receive a normal Final Contextual score; the current main deck is illegal in both copy count and banlist |
| 2 | Solemn Judgment (1 copy) to make room | A Main Deck searcher or a side-compatible replacement | Lowers LP-cost interaction and improves consistency |
| 3 | none | A side deck of 15 cards | A zero-card side deck leaves D12 at 30 and removes all post-side planning |
Evidence & confidence
- Verified: Legality status Illegal: Super Polymerization 3 copies vs limit 2; Dimension Shifter Forbidden; Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 counts and copy histogram {1:9, 2:5, 3:7}; Extra Deck breakdown: fusion 8, link 3, xyz 2, synchro 2
- Inferred: P(>=1 searcher in 5) ~0.94 from hypergeometric estimate; Interaction density and negation/removal scoring from card text; Dead-hand and brick risk from trap-heavy composition
- Provisional: Meta Power (null, no dated metagame sample); Matchup and format fit (D13)
- Data gaps: Deck title is null and the archetype label Odion matches no card in the list (0% exact-name purity); archetype assignment is unverified Usage statistics mark Super Starslayer TY-PHON, S:P Little Knight and Link Spider as not in the deck, but the cards array lists all three in the Extra Deck (extra_count 15); this evidence conflict was resolved in favour of the cards array No combos supplied (total_combos 0), so ceiling, median and floor are text-only inference No tournament link, no win-rate telemetry, no metagame sample; Meta Power is provisional Side deck is empty, so post-side adaptability cannot be measured
Couldn't load the combos





